new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 53/100, with Enter at 48/100, Hold at 59/100, and Exit at 23/100. The live verdict is HOLD, driven by ai_engine=hold, and the pool ranks #283 of 2403 raydium-amm pools. This indicates a middle-of-the-set assessment rather than a strong entry signal: fee-funded returns are present, but small-pool liquidity and memecoin exposure limit conviction. A TVL drain, sustained volume contraction, or yield collapse would weaken the assessment; durable volume growth and deeper liquidity would improve it.
Computed 2026-07-23 21:17 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$71.11K
Total value locked
$2.54K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up1.7%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -16.5%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use 0.04x as the current activity baseline, and set a rule to reduce or exit the position if volume-to-liquidity falls materially below that level for several days or if SUPPOMAN moves outside the selected tick range.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 1.7% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 1.7% | — | — |
| Volume | $2.54K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $6.35 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SUPPOMAN-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#3983 of 34958 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 11% of all Solana pools
overall rank #6882 of 66494
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SUPPOMAN-SOL liquidity pool on raydium-amm. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SUPPOMAN and SOL into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but your final holdings can become more concentrated in the token that falls in relative value, and the memecoin may be difficult to sell during a sharp move.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Total APR is 1.7%, comprising fee-only APR of 1.7% and reward-only APR of 0.0%. 99% of yield comes from trading fees, so returns depend on sustained volume rather than farm emissions. Reward dependency is not established, and there is no current basis for assuming time-bound rewards or a remaining reward period.
shieldRisk Assessment
A quantified seven-day impermanent-loss reading is unavailable, and seven-day tick-in-range history is also unavailable, so recent price divergence and range efficiency cannot be assessed from those metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, SUPPOMAN-SOL carries substantial token-price and liquidity risk; emission decay or incentive withdrawal can reduce exit liquidity and make timing important even when fee income remains available. LPs should treat sharp SUPPOMAN moves, declining volume, and a shrinking pool as potential exit signals.
tollSUPPOMAN Context
SUPPOMAN is the memecoin side of this pair and its price behavior is the main idiosyncratic risk for the LP. Liquidity depth outside this pool is not established here, so a sharp SUPPOMAN repricing can create adverse inventory, wider execution slippage, and impermanent loss that fee income may not offset.
tollSOL Context
SOL provides the pair's more established asset and is the settlement asset for many Solana trades. SOL price changes still affect the relative price between the two assets; a move in SOL against SUPPOMAN can shift the LP toward one token and alter the position's value even if SUPPOMAN is unchanged in dollar terms.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SUPPOMAN and SOL into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but your final holdings can become more concentrated in the token that falls in relative value, and the memecoin may be difficult to sell during a sharp move.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 2ZRMpEat65m8p3hzy4EPmXVwDUvUpQ1qLR9oq6epinS3
- Protocol
- raydium-amm
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SUPPOMAN (8XkvLLFH…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
open_in_newView all raydium-amm pools →By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The pool currently reports reward-only APR of 0.0% and fee-only APR of 1.7%, so the stated 1.7% is driven by trading fees rather than active emissions. If incentives are introduced and later decay, the reward component would fall while fee income would still depend on volume.
The pool currently reports reward-only APR of 0.0% and fee-only APR of 1.7%, so the stated 1.7% is driven by trading fees rather than active emissions. If incentives are introduced and later decay, the reward component would fall while fee income would still depend on volume.
Because reward-only APR is 0.0% and fee sustainability is 99%, incentive expiry would not remove the currently reported source of yield, but it could reduce demand for the LP position and weaken liquidity. The remaining return would depend on trading fees at the then-current volume.
Because reward-only APR is 0.0% and fee sustainability is 99%, incentive expiry would not remove the currently reported source of yield, but it could reduce demand for the LP position and weaken liquidity. The remaining return would depend on trading fees at the then-current volume.
Risk is elevated because SUPPOMAN can move sharply and the pool has TVL of $71K with volume-to-liquidity of 0.04x. Price divergence, shallow liquidity, and declining memecoin interest can produce impermanent loss and make exits more costly than the fee income suggests.
Risk is elevated because SUPPOMAN can move sharply and the pool has TVL of $71K with volume-to-liquidity of 0.04x. Price divergence, shallow liquidity, and declining memecoin interest can produce impermanent loss and make exits more costly than the fee income suggests.
For this pool, predefined triggers should include a sustained fall below the current 0.04x, a material TVL drain from $71K, a sharp SUPPOMAN move outside your range, or a drop in fee-only APR below 1.7%. These conditions indicate that liquidity and fee compensation may no longer justify the token and range risk.
For this pool, predefined triggers should include a sustained fall below the current 0.04x, a material TVL drain from $71K, a sharp SUPPOMAN move outside your range, or a drop in fee-only APR below 1.7%. These conditions indicate that liquidity and fee compensation may no longer justify the token and range risk.
There is no defensible fixed break-even period because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and SUPPOMAN price divergence can dominate fee income. At fee-only APR of 1.7%, recovery is slow if the token pair moves substantially; compare realized fees with the position's actual value loss rather than assuming the headline 1.7% will cover it.
There is no defensible fixed break-even period because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and SUPPOMAN price divergence can dominate fee income. At fee-only APR of 1.7%, recovery is slow if the token pair moves substantially; compare realized fees with the position's actual value loss rather than assuming the headline 1.7% will cover it.
