VNXAU-USDCon Raydium CLMMCLMM
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $206.04K
- APR
- 1.5% APR
- 24h Volume
- $5.71K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.15% fee
- Pool address
- 2heEe7Sn…ed3V · observed 2026-07-24
Wealthville Score
Verdict REDUCE · 40% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
A Wealthville Score of 53/100 with Enter 40/100, Hold 70/100, and Exit 50/100 produces a live verdict of REDUCE, not a clear accumulation signal. The pool ranks #395 of 1157 raydium-clmm pools, while the verdict drivers are mixed: the AI engine is positive, the scanner is CRITICAL, and one source signals EXIT against at least one positive source, resulting in REDUCE rather than the prior hard-EXIT treatment. The assessment would improve with sustained volume, stable or rising TVL, and resolution of the critical scanner finding; it would worsen with a TVL drain, fee-yield collapse, or evidence that VNXAU liquidity is becoming harder to exit.
Computed 2026-07-23 21:17 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$206.04K
Total value locked
$5.71K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up1.5%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 1.4%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Proceed with Caution
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a deliberately narrow range around the current VNXAU-USDC price only if you can monitor it, and rebalance when price leaves that range; exit rather than widening indefinitely if pool TVL falls by a quarter from $206K or the scanner remains CRITICAL while fee activity weakens.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 1.5% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 1.5% | — | — |
| Volume | $5.71K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $8.57 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 VNXAU-USDC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#795 of 7506 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 29% of all Solana pools
overall rank #18902 of 66494
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the VNXAU-USDC liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing VNXAU and USDC into a trading range so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but a large VNXAU price move can leave you with an unfavorable mix of the two assets, and the memecoin may be difficult to sell quickly.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 1.5% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 99% of the displayed yield is fee-funded, while reward dependency remains unconfirmed; the current reward component provides no meaningful emission-based contribution. For this MEMECOIN pool, fee income is therefore tied to continued swap activity rather than an emissions schedule.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading is unavailable, and seven-day tick-in-range history is also unavailable, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified from these metrics. VNXAU's memecoin classification adds token-price, liquidity, and exit-timing risk; any future emissions would be subject to decay, and the absence of rewards means there is no current emission cushion if trading fees weaken. Concentrated liquidity can also become inactive when VNXAU moves outside the selected range.
tollVNXAU Context
VNXAU is the volatile side of this pair and supplies most of the directional and liquidity risk for the LP. Its liquidity depth outside this pool is not established here, so a sharp VNXAU move or thin exit liquidity can increase slippage and impermanent loss. A VNXAU price rise or fall changes the inventory mix and can leave the LP holding more of the weaker-performing asset after rebalancing.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is the dollar-denominated reference asset and the comparatively stable side of the pair. Its broader Solana liquidity generally supports conversion and hedging, but that does not remove VNXAU-specific price or pool-range risk. When VNXAU moves materially against USDC, the LP position becomes increasingly exposed to the resulting inventory imbalance.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing VNXAU and USDC into a trading range so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but a large VNXAU price move can leave you with an unfavorable mix of the two assets, and the memecoin may be difficult to sell quickly.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 2heEe7SnmSap5CvYaEPLLws8kaYJtzA5k2Chwnm5ed3V
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- VNXAU (9TPL8dro…)
- Token B
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Created
- 4/20/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
open_in_newView all raydium-clmm pools →By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 0.0%, so the displayed 1.5% APR is not presently reliant on emissions. If incentives are introduced later, emission decay could reduce that portion, while 1.5% would remain dependent on trading volume.
The current reward component is 0.0%, so the displayed 1.5% APR is not presently reliant on emissions. If incentives are introduced later, emission decay could reduce that portion, while 1.5% would remain dependent on trading volume.
There is currently no meaningful reward contribution, so expiration would not remove a material part of the displayed yield. The remaining return would be 1.5%, and it would continue only if swaps generate fees; 99% is already fee-funded.
There is currently no meaningful reward contribution, so expiration would not remove a material part of the displayed yield. The remaining return would be 1.5%, and it would continue only if swaps generate fees; 99% is already fee-funded.
Risk is elevated because VNXAU can move sharply, liquidity may be limited, and the position can become inactive outside its price range. The pool has $206K, $6K in 24-hour volume, and 0.03x volume-to-TVL turnover, so exits may be more sensitive to market conditions than in deeper, more actively traded pools.
Risk is elevated because VNXAU can move sharply, liquidity may be limited, and the position can become inactive outside its price range. The pool has $206K, $6K in 24-hour volume, and 0.03x volume-to-TVL turnover, so exits may be more sensitive to market conditions than in deeper, more actively traded pools.
For this pool, an exit is warranted when VNXAU leaves your range and you cannot actively rebalance, or when TVL falls materially below $206K while fee activity deteriorates. A persistent CRITICAL scanner result, worsening exit liquidity, or a move toward the 50/100 assessment would also support reducing exposure.
For this pool, an exit is warranted when VNXAU leaves your range and you cannot actively rebalance, or when TVL falls materially below $206K while fee activity deteriorates. A persistent CRITICAL scanner result, worsening exit liquidity, or a move toward the 50/100 assessment would also support reducing exposure.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range-utilization history are unavailable. At 1.5% in annualized fee income, fees would need to offset both the price-divergence loss and any rebalancing or exit costs; the time could be much longer if volume remains near 0.03x turnover.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range-utilization history are unavailable. At 1.5% in annualized fee income, fees would need to offset both the price-divergence loss and any rebalancing or exit costs; the time could be much longer if volume remains near 0.03x turnover.
