WealthVille
WF
W
WFAI
W

WF-WFAIon Raydium AMM

Chain
Solana
TVL
TVL $108.29K
APR
0.1% APR
24h Volume
$172.98 24h vol
Pool address
32fYszjXE45k · observed 2026-09-06
17F · Poor

Wealthville Score

Verdict EXIT · 70% confidence

ai_engine=holdscanner=CRITICAL
How this score works →
Enter15

new capital

Hold20

keep position

Exit80

urgency to leave

A Wealthville Score of 17/100 places this pool below its Enter score of 15/100 and Hold score of 20/100, while the Exit score is 80/100. The live verdict is EXIT: the AI engine says hold, but the scanner is CRITICAL and the strong EXIT signal is unopposed. Its rank of #699 of 2403 raydium-amm pools indicates a middling-to-lower position in the tracked set, not evidence that the pool is safer than other memecoin alternatives. The assessment would improve only if sustained volume increased fee production, liquidity deepened, and the critical scanner signal cleared; a TVL drain, further yield collapse, or worsening execution conditions would reinforce the exit assessment.

Computed 2026-09-06 14:49 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.

Liquidityhelp

lock

$108.29K

Total value locked

$172.98

24h volume

×0.0 turnover

Yieldhelp

trending_up

0.1%

advertised APR

Fee yield, annualized

-5.0%

adjusted · net of IL (est.)

My Position

account_balance_wallet
Live DataUpdated 89m agoTVL 13.8%
block

AI Verdict

Avoid

WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.

check_circleFee-driven yield: 100% of APR from trading fees
warningElevated risk score: 98/100
tips_and_updates

If entering, use a narrow range only after confirming executable depth, and set a hard exit if the scanner remains CRITICAL at the next review or TVL falls below $108K; do not widen the range to compensate for weak fee generation.

syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background

table_chart

Performance Breakdown

Metric24h / Day7d / Week30d / Month
Total APR0.1%
Fee APR0.1%
Volume$172.98
Fees Earned$0.43

Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.

analytics

Efficiency Metrics

Computed

Deterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.

Sustainable Gross APY
0.2%(trailing 7d fees)
Impermanent-Loss Drag
−5.3%(realized, 30d annualized)
Adjusted Net APY (est.)
-5.0%(drags exceed yield)
Volume / TVL Ratio (24h)
0.00x(protocol avg 2.9x)
Fee Yield per $1 TVL / Day
$0.0000
Fee APR Sustainability
100% from trading fees(sustainable)
leaderboard

Pool Rankings

compare_arrows

#1 of 2 WF-WFAI pools

by AI Farmer Score

hub

#13837 of 61707 on raydium-amm

by AI Farmer Score

leaderboard

Top 18% of all Solana pools

overall rank #18965 of 107256

lightbulb

How This Pool Works

Beginner Friendly

This page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the WF-WFAI liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.

Providing liquidity here means depositing WF and WFAI into the same pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your token amounts can change as prices move, and the current return is mainly tied to swap activity rather than rewards.

description

Pool Analysis

trending_upYield Source Breakdown

Total APR of 0.1% decomposes into fee-only APR of 0.1% and reward-only APR of 0.0%. 100% of yield comes from trading fees, so the displayed return depends on swap activity rather than current farm emissions. Reward dependency is unknown, and no time-bound reward estimate is available.

shieldRisk Assessment

Seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable, and seven-day tick-in-range exposure is not reported, so recent price divergence and range efficiency cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, WF-WFAI is exposed to abrupt repricing, thin liquidity, and exit slippage in either token. Any future emissions would also be subject to decay, while the current low activity makes fee generation sensitive to changes in routing and liquidity.

tollWF Context

WF is one side of the pair, so providing liquidity creates exposure to WF price movement against WFAI rather than a neutral cash position. Liquidity depth for WF elsewhere is not established by the supplied pool data; sharp WF moves can therefore change the pool's inventory mix and increase the cost of exiting.

tollWFAI Context

WFAI is the other side of the pair and determines how WF exposure is balanced inside the pool. Its external liquidity depth is not established here, so a large WFAI move or weak market depth can produce inventory imbalance, wider execution costs, and greater loss relative to simply holding the tokens.

lightbulbSimple Explanation

Providing liquidity here means depositing WF and WFAI into the same pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your token amounts can change as prices move, and the current return is mainly tied to swap activity rather than rewards.

token

Token Details

WF
WFSolana
Explorer

WF is one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

WFAI
WFAISolana
Explorer

WFAI is one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

info

Pool Details

Pool Address
32fYszjX988VbTJ66hf32uubmJy75a1icd6f4gDSE45k
Protocol
Raydium AMM
Chain
solana
Fee Tier
Pool Type
AMM
Token A
WF (7nKLkvKs…)
Token B
WFAI (8DwFCrXG…)
Created
4/22/2026
lock

Non-Custodial

Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.

source

Verified Data Sources

Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield

psychology

AI-Powered Analysis

Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data

⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.

quiz

Frequently Asked Questions

The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, so the stated APR is not currently supported by farm emissions. If rewards are introduced later, emission decay would reduce that component unless trading fees replace it.

The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, so the stated APR is not currently supported by farm emissions. If rewards are introduced later, emission decay would reduce that component unless trading fees replace it.

The pool would retain its fee-only APR of 0.1% if trading continues, because 100% of current yield comes from fees. With no reward component shown, incentive expiry would not remove a currently stated reward return, but lower activity could reduce fees.

The pool would retain its fee-only APR of 0.1% if trading continues, because 100% of current yield comes from fees. With no reward component shown, incentive expiry would not remove a currently stated reward return, but lower activity could reduce fees.

Risk is high because WF and WFAI can reprice abruptly, external liquidity depth is not established, and the scanner is CRITICAL. Limited activity, reflected by Vol/TVL of 0.00x, can also make exits more sensitive to slippage.

Risk is high because WF and WFAI can reprice abruptly, external liquidity depth is not established, and the scanner is CRITICAL. Limited activity, reflected by Vol/TVL of 0.00x, can also make exits more sensitive to slippage.

For this pool, the live verdict is EXIT and the scanner signal is CRITICAL, so an LP should set an exit rule before entering and act if the critical signal persists, TVL declines from $108K, or volume no longer supports fee generation.

For this pool, the live verdict is EXIT and the scanner signal is CRITICAL, so an LP should set an exit rule before entering and act if the critical signal persists, TVL declines from $108K, or volume no longer supports fee generation.

There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and memecoin price divergence can dominate fees. Ignoring price effects, recovery would depend on the fee-only APR of 0.1%, but that rate is not guaranteed.

There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and memecoin price divergence can dominate fees. Ignoring price effects, recovery would depend on the fee-only APR of 0.1%, but that rate is not guaranteed.

Latest insights

Research, Recaps & Solana Alpha

Data-driven yield analysis and weekly market wraps — written for active LPs.

All insights