new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 45/100 places this pool in a middle assessment rather than a strong entry setup: Enter is 39/100, Hold is 53/100, and Exit is 28/100. The live verdict is HOLD, with ai_engine=hold as the stated verdict driver, and the pool ranks #621 of 8541 raydium-amm pools. This implies the model currently favors monitoring an existing position over adding aggressively, consistent with fee-funded yield but limited trading activity and memecoin risk. A sustained TVL drain, further volume contraction, collapse in fee APR, or evidence of worsening exit liquidity would weaken the assessment; durable volume and TVL growth could improve it.
Computed 2026-09-17 17:28 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$57.76K
Total value locked
$2.65K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up1.8%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -26.9%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Set a monitoring rule to reassess or exit if daily volume remains below $3K for three consecutive days; low activity would weaken fee generation and make a narrow active range harder to manage.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 1.8% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 1.8% | — | — |
| Volume | $2.65K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $6.63 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 SOL-OPTIMUS pools
by AI Farmer Score
#13423 of 67260 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 17% of all Solana pools
overall rank #19011 of 116409
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-OPTIMUS liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and OPTIMUS into a shared pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a portion of trading fees, but the value of your deposit can differ from simply holding the two tokens, especially if OPTIMUS moves sharply against SOL.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The displayed yield decomposes into 1.8% fee-only APR and 0.0% reward-only APR. 99% of yield comes from trading fees, so emission decay is not currently the source of the quoted return. Reward duration cannot be assessed from the available pool data.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history and the seven-day share of liquidity remaining within the active tick range are not reported, so recent price divergence and range efficiency cannot be quantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-OPTIMUS carries token-specific price and liquidity risk in addition to SOL exposure; emission schedules can reduce future incentives, although no reward component is currently displayed. Exit timing matters because a thin pool can make unwinding more costly when attention or liquidity leaves.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established large-cap asset in this pair and generally has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana venues than OPTIMUS. SOL price moves relative to OPTIMUS determine the pool's inventory shift and can create impermanent loss when the two assets diverge, even if SOL itself remains liquid elsewhere.
tollOPTIMUS Context
OPTIMUS is the memecoin side of the pair, so its price discovery and exit liquidity are more dependent on concentrated market attention than SOL's. A sharp OPTIMUS move can increase inventory imbalance and impermanent loss, while a decline in OPTIMUS liquidity can make rebalancing or exiting this LP more difficult.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and OPTIMUS into a shared pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a portion of trading fees, but the value of your deposit can differ from simply holding the two tokens, especially if OPTIMUS moves sharply against SOL.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 33hmxy64sjEqUNfCAHbUu2Gi6w9AVP7L6uZgY2Rmbuwy
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- OPTIMUS (9fURVh8Y…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
81%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
8%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, while fee-only APR is 1.8% and total APR is 1.8%. Because the displayed yield is entirely fee-funded at 99%, reward emission decay does not currently reduce the quoted reward component, but future incentives cannot be assumed.
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, while fee-only APR is 1.8% and total APR is 1.8%. Because the displayed yield is entirely fee-funded at 99%, reward emission decay does not currently reduce the quoted reward component, but future incentives cannot be assumed.
No reward APR is currently displayed, so there is no present incentive component to remove from 1.8%. If incentives are added and later expire, returns would rely on trading fees, currently represented by 1.8%, and would vary with volume.
No reward APR is currently displayed, so there is no present incentive component to remove from 1.8%. If incentives are added and later expire, returns would rely on trading fees, currently represented by 1.8%, and would vary with volume.
Risk is elevated because OPTIMUS can experience sharp price changes and thinner exit liquidity than SOL. The pool has TVL of $58K, volume of $3K, and fee sustainability of 99%; recent impermanent-loss and in-range history is unavailable, so the realized price-divergence risk cannot be measured from the supplied data.
Risk is elevated because OPTIMUS can experience sharp price changes and thinner exit liquidity than SOL. The pool has TVL of $58K, volume of $3K, and fee sustainability of 99%; recent impermanent-loss and in-range history is unavailable, so the realized price-divergence risk cannot be measured from the supplied data.
A concrete signal for this pool is daily volume staying below $3K for three consecutive days, because fee generation would weaken from an already limited activity base. Also reassess if OPTIMUS liquidity deteriorates, the active price range is no longer maintained, or the pool's live verdict changes from HOLD.
A concrete signal for this pool is daily volume staying below $3K for three consecutive days, because fee generation would weaken from an already limited activity base. Also reassess if OPTIMUS liquidity deteriorates, the active price range is no longer maintained, or the pool's live verdict changes from HOLD.
There is no defensible fixed break-even time because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future volume is uncertain. An LP would need realized fees near 1.8% to offset the actual loss from SOL and OPTIMUS price divergence; the nominal total return is 1.8%, not a guaranteed recovery rate.
There is no defensible fixed break-even time because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future volume is uncertain. An LP would need realized fees near 1.8% to offset the actual loss from SOL and OPTIMUS price divergence; the nominal total return is 1.8%, not a guaranteed recovery rate.
