Wealthville Score
Verdict AVOID · 59% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 19/100 assigns Enter 10/100, Hold 30/100, and Exit 60/100, producing a live verdict of AVOID from ai_engine=hold. The pool ranks #1436 of 24532 raydium-amm pools, which places it well below the strongest alternatives but does not by itself indicate an immediate exit. The hold assessment is consistent with fee-funded yield and existing liquidity, tempered by low turnover and memecoin-specific risk. A TVL drain, collapse in trading fees, or sustained reduction in volume would weaken the case; stronger and persistent volume with stable liquidity could improve it.
Computed 2026-10-26 16:31 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$204.53K
Total value locked
$23.01K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up12.6%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -83.3%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a full-range position while tick data is unavailable, and reassess or exit if pool TVL falls materially or Vol/TVL deteriorates from 0.11x; do not rely on unconfirmed rewards to justify staying in the position.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 12.6% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 11.9% | — | — |
| Volume | $23.01K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $57.53 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 4 SOL-Chud pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1747 of 91854 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 3% of all Solana pools
overall rank #4097 of 148664
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-Chud liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and CHUD into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the amounts of SOL and CHUD you own can change, and the value of the pair can fall if CHUD loses liquidity or price.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The return decomposes into 11.9% from trading fees and 0.7% from rewards, with 94%. Reward dependency is not established, so the fee component is the only reliable basis for evaluating current yield; any future emissions or their decay should be treated as uncertain rather than assumed persistent.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-in-range readings are unavailable, so recent price divergence and concentrated-liquidity utilization cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-CHUD carries elevated token-specific volatility and liquidity-exit risk; emissions may decay or cease, while exit timing matters because a volume decline can make fee income and position unwinding less favorable.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established base asset in this pair and has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana markets than CHUD. SOL price movements relative to CHUD determine the pool's inventory shift and can create impermanent loss even when SOL itself remains liquid elsewhere. A sharp SOL move can therefore change the LP's asset mix faster than fee income offsets that divergence.
tollChud Context
CHUD is the memecoin side of the pair, so its liquidity, price discovery, and holder activity are more dependent on this pool and comparable venues. A CHUD rally or drawdown against SOL changes the LP's exposure through rebalancing and may increase impermanent loss. Thin CHUD liquidity outside the pool can also make exits more price-sensitive.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and CHUD into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the amounts of SOL and CHUD you own can change, and the value of the pair can fall if CHUD loses liquidity or price.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 3Cv7Z8KN21M6Ur6nTeKiKEPcjTuEAg87Ciu6cC3gRnw6
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- Chud (6yjNqPzT…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
9%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
5%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current return is split between 11.9% in fees and 0.7% in rewards, with 94%. Because reward dependency is not established, any emission decay would mainly remove an uncertain component rather than change the fee-funded basis of the pool.
The current return is split between 11.9% in fees and 0.7% in rewards, with 94%. Because reward dependency is not established, any emission decay would mainly remove an uncertain component rather than change the fee-funded basis of the pool.
The reward component would fall toward zero, while trading-fee income would remain tied to volume. Since the current reward contribution is 0.7% and fee sustainability is 94%, the pool should be evaluated primarily on whether $23K and 0.11x can support fees without incentives.
The reward component would fall toward zero, while trading-fee income would remain tied to volume. Since the current reward contribution is 0.7% and fee sustainability is 94%, the pool should be evaluated primarily on whether $23K and 0.11x can support fees without incentives.
The main risks are CHUD price volatility, shallow exit liquidity, and impermanent loss from SOL and CHUD moving differently. Recent seven-day loss and tick-range readings are unavailable, so those risks cannot be calibrated from the supplied history; the MEMECOIN classification warrants conservative sizing.
The main risks are CHUD price volatility, shallow exit liquidity, and impermanent loss from SOL and CHUD moving differently. Recent seven-day loss and tick-range readings are unavailable, so those risks cannot be calibrated from the supplied history; the MEMECOIN classification warrants conservative sizing.
For SOL-CHUD, consider exiting when TVL drains, trading volume weakens enough to reduce fee income, or CHUD liquidity becomes difficult to unwind. A deterioration from 0.11x, a collapse in 11.9%, or the end of any unconfirmed rewards would be concrete reassessment signals.
For SOL-CHUD, consider exiting when TVL drains, trading volume weakens enough to reduce fee income, or CHUD liquidity becomes difficult to unwind. A deterioration from 0.11x, a collapse in 11.9%, or the end of any unconfirmed rewards would be concrete reassessment signals.
A precise break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss data is unavailable. The relevant comparison is cumulative fees of 11.9% against the unmeasured loss from SOL-CHUD price divergence; with 0.11x turnover, recovery depends on sustained trading rather than assumed rewards.
A precise break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss data is unavailable. The relevant comparison is cumulative fees of 11.9% against the unmeasured loss from SOL-CHUD price divergence; with 0.11x turnover, recovery depends on sustained trading rather than assumed rewards.
