Wealthville Score
Verdict AVOID · 59% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 19/100 with Enter 10/100, Hold 30/100, and Exit 60/100 supports the live verdict AVOID, not a strong new-entry signal. The ai_engine=hold driver is consistent with a pool ranked #767 of 24532 raydium-amm pools: it is not among the weakest venues by the ranking, but its low 0.02x activity and fee-dependent return limit the case for adding capital. The assessment would worsen if TVL drained, trading volume fell further, or fee yield collapsed; sustained volume growth and deeper liquidity would improve it.
Computed 2026-10-27 00:18 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$27.09K
Total value locked
$437.43
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up1.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 0.7%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a defined price range and monitor it at least daily; rebalance or exit when the SOL/$GREMLY price leaves that range or when TVL begins to drain materially, since the reported fee yield is tied to limited trading activity.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 1.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 1.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $437.43 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $1.09 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 7 SOL-$GREMLY pools
by AI Farmer Score
#12768 of 93745 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 13% of all Solana pools
overall rank #18311 of 150817
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-$GREMLY liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and $GREMLY into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but a large price move in either token can leave you with a different and potentially less valuable mix than you deposited.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The total APR of 1.0% consists of 1.0% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 99% of the reported yield comes from fees, while reward dependency is not established. With <<VOL_TVL>> volume relative to TVL, fee generation depends on limited observed trading activity rather than emissions.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-in-range readings are not reported, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified from the available data. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-$GREMLY also carries token-specific price and liquidity risk, with emission decay and incentive changes potentially reducing the reason to remain in the position. Exit timing matters because a sharp move in $GREMLY can leave the LP holding a larger share of the weaker-performing asset.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established asset in this pair and has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana markets than $GREMLY. For this LP, SOL price movements against $GREMLY drive the balance between the two deposited assets and can create impermanent loss even when fee income is positive.
toll$GREMLY Context
$GREMLY is the memecoin side of the pair, so its liquidity and price discovery are likely more dependent on this pool and other comparatively shallow venues. A rapid $GREMLY repricing can increase inventory imbalance, widen execution risk, and make exit timing more important for LPs.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and $GREMLY into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but a large price move in either token can leave you with a different and potentially less valuable mix than you deposited.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 41j756SDtaSZtDGFC8tGCdzhyuchGmQCZzkmW5sdQnbX
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- $GREMLY (X69GKB2f…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
13%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
6%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The pool currently reports 0.0% in reward APR, so there is no reported reward contribution to decay at present. Its 1.0% return is therefore primarily represented by 1.0%, and any future emissions would need to be evaluated separately from fee income.
The pool currently reports 0.0% in reward APR, so there is no reported reward contribution to decay at present. Its 1.0% return is therefore primarily represented by 1.0%, and any future emissions would need to be evaluated separately from fee income.
Because the reported reward APR is 0.0% and 99% of yield comes from fees, expiration would not remove the reported reward contribution but could reduce any future incentive support. LP economics would then depend mainly on trading volume, which is 0.02x relative to TVL.
Because the reported reward APR is 0.0% and 99% of yield comes from fees, expiration would not remove the reported reward contribution but could reduce any future incentive support. LP economics would then depend mainly on trading volume, which is 0.02x relative to TVL.
Risk is high relative to a SOL pair with a more established second asset because $GREMLY can reprice sharply and may have thinner exit liquidity. The pool reports $27K in TVL, $437 in daily volume, and 1.0% APR, so fee income does not by itself offset token and liquidity risk.
Risk is high relative to a SOL pair with a more established second asset because $GREMLY can reprice sharply and may have thinner exit liquidity. The pool reports $27K in TVL, $437 in daily volume, and 1.0% APR, so fee income does not by itself offset token and liquidity risk.
For SOL-$GREMLY, consider exiting when the price leaves your active range, TVL drains materially, or trading activity no longer supports the fee return. A worsening Wealthville verdict from AVOID or a deterioration in 0.02x would also weaken the holding case.
For SOL-$GREMLY, consider exiting when the price leaves your active range, TVL drains materially, or trading activity no longer supports the fee return. A worsening Wealthville verdict from AVOID or a deterioration in 0.02x would also weaken the holding case.
A precise break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss data is not reported. With 1.0% in fee APR, the simple no-price-change estimate is roughly the inverse of that annual rate, but actual recovery depends on future volume, price divergence, and whether the position remains in range.
A precise break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss data is not reported. With 1.0% in fee APR, the simple no-price-change estimate is roughly the inverse of that annual rate, but actual recovery depends on future volume, price divergence, and whether the position remains in range.
