new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 40/100 places this pool in a middle assessment rather than a strong entry setup: Enter is 34/100, Hold is 46/100, and Exit is 34/100, with the live verdict HOLD. The listed verdict driver is ai_engine=hold, and the pool ranks #364 of 8541 raydium-amm pools, which indicates a relatively favorable position within the tracked set but does not remove its small-liquidity and memecoin risks. A sustained TVL drain, collapse in fee APR, weaker volume, or worsening execution conditions would change the assessment; durable volume and liquidity improvement could support a higher one.
Computed 2026-09-06 08:43 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$29.82K
Total value locked
$2.78K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up7.7%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -0.4%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a monitored, relatively narrow tick range and rebalance when price leaves that range; remove liquidity if 0.09x deteriorates persistently or fee income no longer compensates for the pool's memecoin exposure.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 7.7% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 7.4% | — | — |
| Volume | $2.78K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $6.95 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 7 SOL-$GREMLY pools
by AI Farmer Score
#2164 of 61707 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 5% of all Solana pools
overall rank #4749 of 107256
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-$GREMLY liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and $GREMLY into a shared trading pool and receiving a share of swap fees. Your holdings can shift toward the token that performs worse, and the value of the position can fall even when fees are earned.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated yield decomposes into 7.4% fee APR and 0.3% reward APR, so 96% of yield comes from trading fees. Reward dependency is not established; because the reward component is currently zero, emission changes do not presently account for the pool's quoted APR. Fee income will instead vary with swap volume, liquidity, and fee capture.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss and tick-range observations are not available, so the position cannot be assessed from a measured N/A history or N/A range statistic. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-$GREMLY carries substantial token-price and liquidity risk, and emission decay or incentive changes could reduce the reason to remain in the position even when fees continue. Exit timing matters because a sharp GREMLY repricing can change the asset mix before fees offset the divergence.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established base asset in this pair and has materially deeper liquidity across Solana markets than a typical memecoin. In this pool, a SOL price move relative to GREMLY changes the inventory held by the LP; stronger SOL performance can leave the LP with proportionally more GREMLY after arbitrage.
toll$GREMLY Context
$GREMLY is the pool's memecoin leg, so its liquidity is likely more concentrated and more sensitive to sentiment than SOL's. A sharp GREMLY price move can increase inventory imbalance and execution risk, while thin external liquidity can make rebalancing or exiting more costly.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and $GREMLY into a shared trading pool and receiving a share of swap fees. Your holdings can shift toward the token that performs worse, and the value of the position can fall even when fees are earned.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 41j756SDtaSZtDGFC8tGCdzhyuchGmQCZzkmW5sdQnbX
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- $GREMLY (X69GKB2f…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
8%
APR
50%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only APR is 0.3%, while fee-only APR is 7.4% and total APR is 7.7%. Emission decay therefore does not currently reduce the quoted reward component, but any future incentives would need separate verification.
The current reward-only APR is 0.3%, while fee-only APR is 7.4% and total APR is 7.7%. Emission decay therefore does not currently reduce the quoted reward component, but any future incentives would need separate verification.
The current reward component is 0.3%, so there is no modeled reward cliff in the present APR. After incentives expire or change, the remaining return would depend primarily on trading fees, represented by 7.4%.
The current reward component is 0.3%, so there is no modeled reward cliff in the present APR. After incentives expire or change, the remaining return would depend primarily on trading fees, represented by 7.4%.
Risk is high relative to a major-asset pair because $GREMLY can reprice sharply and its liquidity may be thinner than SOL's. The pool's fee-based return is 7.4%, but that does not guarantee compensation for price divergence, inventory imbalance, or exit slippage.
Risk is high relative to a major-asset pair because $GREMLY can reprice sharply and its liquidity may be thinner than SOL's. The pool's fee-based return is 7.4%, but that does not guarantee compensation for price divergence, inventory imbalance, or exit slippage.
Consider exiting when the pool's fee generation weakens, liquidity drains, price leaves your selected range, or the memecoin thesis no longer justifies the exposure. For this pool, monitor 0.09x, $30K, and 7.4% rather than relying on the headline APR alone.
Consider exiting when the pool's fee generation weakens, liquidity drains, price leaves your selected range, or the memecoin thesis no longer justifies the exposure. For this pool, monitor 0.09x, $30K, and 7.4% rather than relying on the headline APR alone.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss observations are unavailable and future volume is uncertain. Fees accrue at 7.4%, but break-even depends on SOL-GREMLY price divergence, time in range, liquidity changes, and realized trading volume.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss observations are unavailable and future volume is uncertain. Fees accrue at 7.4%, but break-even depends on SOL-GREMLY price divergence, time in range, liquidity changes, and realized trading volume.
