neet-USDCon Raydium CLMMCLMMActive
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $424.09K
- APR
- 13.1% APR
- 24h Volume
- $157.38K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.10% fee
- Pool address
- 4AnR1SU1…TVw7 · observed 2026-10-23
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 52/100 gives this pool a Hold verdict of HOLD, with Enter at 46/100, Hold at 59/100, and Exit at 21/100. The ai_engine=hold driver indicates that the system does not treat current conditions as a clear new-entry or forced-exit signal. Its rank of #1258 of 9963 raydium-clmm pools places it above many listed pools but does not offset the specific risks of a MEMECOIN pair, uncertain lifecycle, and unavailable recent range and IL history. The assessment would change if TVL drained, volume weakened enough to reduce 12.3%, fee yield collapsed toward 0.8%, or sustained activity and range data provided stronger evidence that the current fee rate was durable.
Computed 2026-10-23 08:38 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$424.09K
Total value locked
$157.38K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up13.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 9.4%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a deliberately bounded range centered on the current NEET-USDC price, and review the position whenever price reaches either boundary; if price remains outside the range or pool TVL falls materially from $424K, withdraw rather than leaving inactive liquidity deployed.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 13.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 12.3% | — | — |
| Volume | $157.38K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $157.38 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#3 of 9 neet-USDC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#770 of 19264 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 3% of all Solana pools
overall rank #3817 of 147092
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the neet-USDC liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing NEET and USDC into a trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but a large NEET price move can leave you with a different mix of the two assets and less value than simply holding them separately.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Total APR of 13.1% decomposes into 12.3% from trading fees and 0.8% from rewards. 94% of the yield is fee-derived, so the return depends on continued swap activity rather than a stated reward schedule. Reward dependency is not established for this pool, and no reliable reward-duration figure is available.
shieldRisk Assessment
A reliable seven-day impermanent-loss reading is unavailable, and recent tick-in-range coverage is also unavailable, so current range efficiency cannot be verified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, NEET-USDC is exposed to sharp NEET price moves, which can create inventory imbalance and impermanent loss while concentrated liquidity becomes inactive outside its range. Emission decay and exit timing are also uncertain because the pool's lifecycle and reward structure are not established; LPs should not assume fee yield will persist after trading activity or incentives change.
tollneet Context
NEET is the memecoin side of this pair and supplies the primary directional risk for an LP. Its liquidity depth outside this pool is not established by the supplied metrics, so a sharp NEET move may be harder to hedge or exit than a move in a larger Solana asset. If NEET rises or falls rapidly against USDC, the LP can end up holding more of the depreciating side and may incur impermanent loss relative to holding the tokens separately.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is the quote and stable-value side of the pair, providing the reference unit for NEET's price and the pool's fee accounting. USDC generally has broader utility across Solana markets, but that does not remove the need to assess NEET-USDC's own liquidity depth or range placement. When NEET sells off, the position tends to accumulate NEET; when NEET rallies, it tends to sell NEET into USDC.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing NEET and USDC into a trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but a large NEET price move can leave you with a different mix of the two assets and less value than simply holding them separately.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 4AnR1SU1eF2YMadkdkXoQqdf5Hc368nforDGbCiDTVw7
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- neet (Ce2gx9KG…)
- Token B
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Created
- 4/20/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The pool's stated APR is 13.1%, made up of 12.3% in fees and 0.8% in rewards. Because the reward schedule is not established, emission decay cannot be timed precisely; any reduction in incentives would mainly matter through the 0.8% component, while fee income depends on continued volume.
The pool's stated APR is 13.1%, made up of 12.3% in fees and 0.8% in rewards. Because the reward schedule is not established, emission decay cannot be timed precisely; any reduction in incentives would mainly matter through the 0.8% component, while fee income depends on continued volume.
The reward component would fall away, leaving the fee component of 12.3% as the relevant yield source. Since the pool's reward dependency and lifecycle are not established, an expiry could also reduce liquidity and trading volume, which would lower realized fees.
The reward component would fall away, leaving the fee component of 12.3% as the relevant yield source. Since the pool's reward dependency and lifecycle are not established, an expiry could also reduce liquidity and trading volume, which would lower realized fees.
Risk is material because NEET can move sharply and concentrated liquidity can become inactive outside its range. The pool has $424K and a 0.37x volume-to-TVL ratio, but recent impermanent-loss and tick-range history is unavailable, so the realized risk cannot be quantified from those measures.
Risk is material because NEET can move sharply and concentrated liquidity can become inactive outside its range. The pool has $424K and a 0.37x volume-to-TVL ratio, but recent impermanent-loss and tick-range history is unavailable, so the realized risk cannot be quantified from those measures.
For NEET-USDC, consider exiting when price leaves your selected range, when TVL declines materially from $424K, or when trading activity no longer supports 12.3%. A sustained collapse in fee income or a sharp NEET move is a stronger exit signal than the displayed 13.1% alone.
For NEET-USDC, consider exiting when price leaves your selected range, when TVL declines materially from $424K, or when trading activity no longer supports 12.3%. A sustained collapse in fee income or a sharp NEET move is a stronger exit signal than the displayed 13.1% alone.
There is no defensible fixed break-even period because recent impermanent-loss data and the future NEET price path are unavailable. In principle, fees of 12.3% can offset impermanent loss over time, but that only occurs if volume, range placement, and fee rates remain sufficiently stable.
There is no defensible fixed break-even period because recent impermanent-loss data and the future NEET price path are unavailable. In principle, fees of 12.3% can offset impermanent loss over time, but that only occurs if volume, range placement, and fee rates remain sufficiently stable.
