new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
A Wealthville Score of 17/100 places this pool above its Enter threshold of 15/100 but below its Hold threshold of 20/100, while the Exit threshold is 80/100. The live verdict is EXIT: the AI engine says hold, but the scanner is CRITICAL and the strong EXIT signal is unopposed. At rank #699 of 2403 raydium-amm pools, this is not among the weakest-ranked pools overall, but the score still indicates insufficient conditions for a new position under the stated framework. A sustained increase in trading volume relative to TVL, deeper liquidity, and removal of the critical scanner condition could improve the assessment; further TVL drain, fee-yield collapse, or worsening execution conditions would reinforce it.
Computed 2026-07-23 21:17 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$67.55K
Total value locked
$366.64
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.7%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 2.2%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a defined exit rule: remove liquidity if the scanner's critical signal persists while volume fails to improve, or if the pool's 0.01x ratio deteriorates further. Use a narrow, actively monitored tick range rather than leaving capital passively exposed, and rebalance when SWAG's price move pushes the position materially toward one token.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.7% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.7% | — | — |
| Volume | $366.64 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.92 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SWAG-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#15827 of 34958 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 30% of all Solana pools
overall rank #19734 of 66494
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SWAG-SOL liquidity pool on raydium-amm. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SWAG and SOL into the pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your final holdings can shift toward the token that falls in price, and the current activity level provides only limited fee income.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield consists of 0.7% fee-only APR and 0.0% reward-only APR, with 100%. Because current rewards contribute nothing, returns depend on trading activity rather than emissions; the pool's low volume relative to liquidity limits the practical fee opportunity. Reward dependency is not established, so no reliable incentive runway can be assigned.
shieldRisk Assessment
The available seven-day impermanent-loss reading is N/A, and tick-in-range coverage is N/A, so recent loss and range behavior cannot be used to validate the position. As a MEMECOIN pool, SWAG-SOL is exposed to sharp SWAG price moves, shallow liquidity, and adverse inventory shifts against SOL. Emission decay and incentive removal are additional exit-timing risks even though current reward APR is zero; a fast exit may also face price impact if liquidity contracts.
tollSWAG Context
SWAG is the memecoin side of this pair, so an LP accumulates more SWAG when its price falls relative to SOL and gives up some SWAG upside when its price rises. Liquidity depth for SWAG outside this pool is not established by these metrics, making large price moves and execution costs relevant to the LP. SWAG price action therefore affects the position independently of the fee income.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base asset and the more established reference asset in this pair, with substantially deeper liquidity across Solana markets than a typical memecoin. If SWAG falls against SOL, the pool rebalances toward SWAG; if SWAG rises, it rebalances toward SOL. SOL volatility still changes the dollar value of both inventories and can amplify the LP's total exposure.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SWAG and SOL into the pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your final holdings can shift toward the token that falls in price, and the current activity level provides only limited fee income.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 4pdwJSSg28c4aZs6EsaXP7MSyAQN8CfgDSY4gNrDTvmr
- Protocol
- raydium-amm
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SWAG (FaxYQ3LV…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
open_in_newView all raydium-amm pools →By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Current reward-only APR is 0.0%, so emission decay does not currently reduce the displayed reward component below its present level. The pool's total APR of 0.7% is instead driven by 0.7%, and any future incentives would need separate monitoring.
Current reward-only APR is 0.0%, so emission decay does not currently reduce the displayed reward component below its present level. The pool's total APR of 0.7% is instead driven by 0.7%, and any future incentives would need separate monitoring.
Because reward-only APR is already 0.0%, expiration of incentives would not remove a current reward stream from the displayed return. The remaining income would be 0.7% from swaps, subject to the pool's low 0.01x activity-to-liquidity ratio.
Because reward-only APR is already 0.0%, expiration of incentives would not remove a current reward stream from the displayed return. The remaining income would be 0.7% from swaps, subject to the pool's low 0.01x activity-to-liquidity ratio.
Risk is elevated because SWAG can move sharply against SOL, liquidity can be thin, and the pool is flagged CRITICAL by the scanner. Recent impermanent loss is reported as N/A, while range coverage is N/A, so recent behavior cannot establish a reliable loss or range profile.
Risk is elevated because SWAG can move sharply against SOL, liquidity can be thin, and the pool is flagged CRITICAL by the scanner. Recent impermanent loss is reported as N/A, while range coverage is N/A, so recent behavior cannot establish a reliable loss or range profile.
For this pool, an exit is most defensible if the critical scanner condition persists, volume weakens relative to $68K, or SWAG's price move leaves the position concentrated in the depreciating token. The current live verdict is EXIT, so an LP should use a predefined rebalance or removal trigger rather than wait for incentives.
For this pool, an exit is most defensible if the critical scanner condition persists, volume weakens relative to $68K, or SWAG's price move leaves the position concentrated in the depreciating token. The current live verdict is EXIT, so an LP should use a predefined rebalance or removal trigger rather than wait for incentives.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because the seven-day impermanent-loss reading is N/A and fee income depends on limited trading activity. At 0.7% fee-only APR, recovery would require sustained fees and stable enough relative prices for those fees to offset the position's actual loss.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because the seven-day impermanent-loss reading is N/A and fee income depends on limited trading activity. At 0.7% fee-only APR, recovery would require sustained fees and stable enough relative prices for those fees to offset the position's actual loss.
