new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The 17/100 Wealthville Score, with Enter 15/100, Hold 20/100, and Exit 80/100, supports a neutral HOLD rather than a clear entry or exit. The live verdict is EXIT, driven by ai_engine=hold, and the pool ranks #621 of 8541 raydium-amm pools, placing it in a broad middle tier rather than among the strongest candidates. The assessment would change if TVL drained, trading volume weakened enough to reduce fee income, WOLF liquidity deteriorated, or the displayed APR collapsed; sustained volume and stable liquidity would provide the opposite evidence.
Computed 2026-09-18 00:01 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$286.44K
Total value locked
$2.79K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.9%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 1.1%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
If entering, set a price-out-of-range alert and a volume check: rebalance or exit when the position leaves its chosen range and 0.01x weakens materially from its entry reading, rather than waiting for fee income to offset a worsening WOLF move.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.9% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.9% | — | — |
| Volume | $2.79K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $6.96 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 SOL-WOLF pools
by AI Farmer Score
#3166 of 67260 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 7% of all Solana pools
overall rank #7174 of 116409
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-WOLF liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and WOLF into the pool so other people can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your holdings change as prices move, so you can end up with more of the weaker token and a lower result than simply holding both assets.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The pool's yield consists of 0.9% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 100% means the displayed APR is currently fee-funded rather than supported by emissions. Reward dependency is not established, so prospective LPs should not assume that any future incentive program will persist; fee income will remain the relevant source if rewards are absent.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading is unavailable, so recent price divergence cannot be quantified from the supplied history; seven-day in-range behavior is also unavailable. As a MEMECOIN pool, WOLF can experience abrupt demand and price changes, increasing the chance that an LP becomes exposed to the weaker asset after rebalancing. Emission decay is an additional family-specific risk if incentives are introduced, and exit timing matters because waiting for rewards can leave an LP exposed after trading activity or WOLF demand has deteriorated.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established base asset in this pair and generally has substantially deeper liquidity elsewhere on Solana than this pool provides. A large SOL move against WOLF changes the pool's inventory mix and can create impermanent loss relative to simply holding SOL and WOLF, even if SOL itself remains liquid outside this pool.
tollWOLF Context
WOLF is the pool's memecoin leg, so its liquidity and price formation are more dependent on this pair and other limited venues than SOL's. A sharp WOLF rally can leave the LP with less WOLF and more SOL, while a sharp decline can leave the LP holding a larger share of the weaker asset.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and WOLF into the pool so other people can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your holdings change as prices move, so you can end up with more of the weaker token and a lower result than simply holding both assets.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 5Pce2B55ms8b2uFyptCnVNkPrtzpyKLe5HtMc8UymWxB
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- WOLF (BTr5SwWS…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
93%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
15%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 0.0%, while fee income is 0.9% and 100%. If emissions are added and then decay, the total APR would fall unless trading fees increase enough to replace them; the current figures do not establish a durable reward schedule.
The current reward component is 0.0%, while fee income is 0.9% and 100%. If emissions are added and then decay, the total APR would fall unless trading fees increase enough to replace them; the current figures do not establish a durable reward schedule.
If incentives expire, the reward portion would disappear and the pool's return would rely on 0.9% in trading fees. Because 100% already identifies fees as the current yield source, the main effect would be lower total APR only if the displayed reward component changes from 0.0%.
If incentives expire, the reward portion would disappear and the pool's return would rely on 0.9% in trading fees. Because 100% already identifies fees as the current yield source, the main effect would be lower total APR only if the displayed reward component changes from 0.0%.
The risk is high relative to a SOL-stablecoin pool because WOLF can move sharply, liquidity can thin, and SOL-WOLF LP holdings can diverge from simply holding the tokens. Recent seven-day impermanent-loss and range-history readings are unavailable, so the recent magnitude of that risk cannot be measured here.
The risk is high relative to a SOL-stablecoin pool because WOLF can move sharply, liquidity can thin, and SOL-WOLF LP holdings can diverge from simply holding the tokens. Recent seven-day impermanent-loss and range-history readings are unavailable, so the recent magnitude of that risk cannot be measured here.
Consider exiting when WOLF demand weakens, pool liquidity drains, or trading activity no longer supports the fee income represented by 0.9%. A price move outside your chosen range combined with a deterioration in 0.01x is a concrete signal to reassess rather than wait for uncertain emissions.
Consider exiting when WOLF demand weakens, pool liquidity drains, or trading activity no longer supports the fee income represented by 0.9%. A price move outside your chosen range combined with a deterioration in 0.01x is a concrete signal to reassess rather than wait for uncertain emissions.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent loss is not reported and future volume is uncertain. Compare realized fees represented by 0.9% with the actual change in the position's value relative to holding SOL and WOLF; 0.9% alone does not guarantee recovery from price divergence.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent loss is not reported and future volume is uncertain. Compare realized fees represented by 0.9% with the actual change in the position's value relative to holding SOL and WOLF; 0.9% alone does not guarantee recovery from price divergence.
