new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
A Wealthville Score of 17/100 with Enter 15/100 / Hold 20/100 / Exit 80/100 means the system treats SOL-G as an exit candidate rather than a new LP allocation. The live verdict EXIT reflects conflicting signals—ai_engine=hold, but scanner=CRITICAL with a strong unopposed EXIT signal—and the pool ranks #1436 of 8541 raydium-amm pools. A sustained increase in real trading volume, deeper TVL, and removal of the critical scanner condition could improve the assessment; a TVL drain, further volume deterioration, or collapse of fee generation would worsen it.
Computed 2026-09-21 18:49 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$88.03K
Total value locked
$118.20
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.3%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -5.3%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
If entering, use a narrow, actively monitored range and set an automated exit if the scanner remains CRITICAL on two consecutive checks or if trading activity falls materially below $118; do not leave the position unattended through a sustained G price move.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.3% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.3% | — | — |
| Volume | $118.20 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.30 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SOL-G pools
by AI Farmer Score
#3659 of 71780 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 7% of all Solana pools
overall rank #7673 of 122041
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-G liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and G into a shared pool so other people can trade between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the pool can end up holding more of the weaker asset, and the current fee income is small relative to the risks.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The reported yield consists of 0.3% in trading-fee APR and 0.0% in reward APR, with fee sustainability at 100%. Because the reward schedule and duration are not established, the fee component is the only dependable basis for evaluating ongoing returns. With this level of APR and activity, the pool is primarily routed for swaps rather than LP yield.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range history are not reported, so realized loss and range efficiency cannot be validated from the available record. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-G carries sharp price divergence risk: a rapid move in G relative to SOL can leave the LP holding more of the declining asset. Emission decay is an additional risk if incentives are introduced later, while exit timing matters because thin volume can make repositioning or withdrawal more dependent on available counterparties.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established, more liquid side of this pair and generally has deeper liquidity elsewhere on Solana than this pool provides. If SOL rises or falls sharply relative to G, the AMM rebalances the position toward the asset that has underperformed, changing the LP's inventory and potentially increasing impermanent loss.
tollG Context
G is the memecoin side of SOL-G, so its liquidity depth outside this pair should not be assumed to match SOL's broader market depth. A sharp move in G can dominate the LP's outcome: strong appreciation can reduce the G held by the pool, while a decline can leave the LP with greater exposure to G as traders sell it.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and G into a shared pool so other people can trade between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the pool can end up holding more of the weaker asset, and the current fee income is small relative to the risks.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 5mrtchWvDS9pTcfnVwu1JM7mR9UAba7oSVpLsg87pUk8
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- G (AXNgt2ty…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
224%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
23%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only component is 0.0%, while fee-only APR is 0.3%. If emissions are added and then decline, the total APR would fall unless trading fees increase; fee sustainability is 100%, so emissions should not be treated as established income.
The current reward-only component is 0.0%, while fee-only APR is 0.3%. If emissions are added and then decline, the total APR would fall unless trading fees increase; fee sustainability is 100%, so emissions should not be treated as established income.
Any temporary reward component would disappear, leaving trading-fee income as the remaining return source. For SOL-G, that means the dependable baseline would be 0.3%, with total APR potentially moving down from 0.3%.
Any temporary reward component would disappear, leaving trading-fee income as the remaining return source. For SOL-G, that means the dependable baseline would be 0.3%, with total APR potentially moving down from 0.3%.
Risk is high because G can move sharply or become difficult to trade while SOL remains liquid elsewhere. SOL-G also has $88K of liquidity and $118 of 24-hour volume, so fee income is limited and exiting may be harder during a fast move.
Risk is high because G can move sharply or become difficult to trade while SOL remains liquid elsewhere. SOL-G also has $88K of liquidity and $118 of 24-hour volume, so fee income is limited and exiting may be harder during a fast move.
For SOL-G, an exit is warranted when the scanner remains CRITICAL, volume weakens, or G diverges sharply from SOL. The current live verdict is EXIT, with Exit scored at 80/100, so waiting for a recovery in emissions is not a sufficient exit plan.
For SOL-G, an exit is warranted when the scanner remains CRITICAL, volume weakens, or G diverges sharply from SOL. The current live verdict is EXIT, with Exit scored at 80/100, so waiting for a recovery in emissions is not a sufficient exit plan.
There is no defensible break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported and the pool's fee income is only 0.3%. Any recovery would depend on future trading fees, relative SOL-G price movement, and how long the position remains in an effective range.
There is no defensible break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported and the pool's fee income is only 0.3%. Any recovery would depend on future trading fees, relative SOL-G price movement, and how long the position remains in an effective range.
