Wealthville Score
Verdict AVOID · 59% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 19/100 places SOL-OOBE in a middling position, while Enter at 10/100, Hold at 30/100, and Exit at 60/100 produce a live AVOID assessment. The stated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold, and the pool ranks #718 of 24532 raydium-amm pools, which indicates a relatively stronger position than most listed pools but does not remove its small-liquidity and memecoin risks. The assessment would change if TVL drained, trading-fee income collapsed, OOBE liquidity deteriorated, or a sustained reward program materially altered the return profile.
Computed 2026-10-26 12:16 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$33.75K
Total value locked
$588.91
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up18.4%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 64.7%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Review the position after each fee cycle and exit if 16.9% falls below your required return or if pool liquidity begins draining materially; do not wait for a reward schedule when the stated yield is fee-only.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 18.4% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 16.9% | — | — |
| Volume | $588.91 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $8.83 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SOL-OOBE pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1532 of 91854 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 3% of all Solana pools
overall rank #3207 of 148664
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-OOBE liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and OOBE into the pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your holdings can end up weighted toward whichever token performs worse, and the small pool size can make withdrawals harder during stress.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The total APR of 18.4% decomposes into 16.9% from trading fees and 1.5% from rewards. 92% of yield comes from trading fees, so the current return does not rely on active token emissions. Reward dependency and the pool's incentive lifecycle are not established; any future emissions would be subject to the usual decay and abrupt changes associated with memecoin farming.
shieldRisk Assessment
A reliable seven-day impermanent-loss reading is not available, and recent tick-in-range history is also unavailable, so fee income cannot be assessed against observed price divergence or range utilization. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-OOBE carries elevated token-specific failure, volatility, and liquidity risks in addition to SOL exposure. If incentives appear later, emission decay can reduce the return quickly; exit timing should prioritize deteriorating liquidity or fee flow rather than waiting for a stated reward schedule.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established network asset in this pair and generally has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana venues than OOBE. SOL price movement against OOBE changes the pool's asset mix and can create impermanent loss even when the pool continues generating fees.
tollOOBE Context
OOBE is the memecoin side of the pair, so its liquidity outside SOL-OOBE should be treated as uncertain unless independently verified. A sharp OOBE repricing can make the LP position accumulate the weakening asset while arbitrage keeps the pool aligned with external prices.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and OOBE into the pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your holdings can end up weighted toward whichever token performs worse, and the small pool size can make withdrawals harder during stress.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 6EbfXCfcwJhfpCazVXmFLMg11waR1BygBBP4pRh6gXkJ
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- OOBE (EikyJKSV…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
9%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
5%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current return is represented by 18.4%, with 16.9% from fees and 1.5% from rewards, so present APR is not dependent on active emissions. If rewards are introduced later, emission decay could lower the reward component without changing fee income.
The current return is represented by 18.4%, with 16.9% from fees and 1.5% from rewards, so present APR is not dependent on active emissions. If rewards are introduced later, emission decay could lower the reward component without changing fee income.
Because the stated reward component is 1.5% and 92% of yield comes from fees, expiration would primarily remove any additional incentive layer rather than the current fee source. The remaining return would depend on trading volume, liquidity, and 16.9%.
Because the stated reward component is 1.5% and 92% of yield comes from fees, expiration would primarily remove any additional incentive layer rather than the current fee source. The remaining return would depend on trading volume, liquidity, and 16.9%.
Risk is high because OOBE can reprice sharply, creating impermanent loss and concentrating the position in the weaker asset. SOL-OOBE also has $34K of liquidity and $589 of recent volume, so execution and withdrawal conditions may worsen during a sell-off.
Risk is high because OOBE can reprice sharply, creating impermanent loss and concentrating the position in the weaker asset. SOL-OOBE also has $34K of liquidity and $589 of recent volume, so execution and withdrawal conditions may worsen during a sell-off.
Consider exiting when 16.9% no longer compensates for token volatility, when pool liquidity drains, or when OOBE's external liquidity and price discovery deteriorate. Waiting for incentives is not a useful exit rule when the stated reward component is 1.5%.
Consider exiting when 16.9% no longer compensates for token volatility, when pool liquidity drains, or when OOBE's external liquidity and price discovery deteriorate. Waiting for incentives is not a useful exit rule when the stated reward component is 1.5%.
There is no defensible fixed break-even period because recent impermanent-loss history and range behavior are unavailable. Break-even depends on future fee income, represented by 16.9%, relative to OOBE-SOL price divergence and the pool's 0.02x turnover.
There is no defensible fixed break-even period because recent impermanent-loss history and range behavior are unavailable. Break-even depends on future fee income, represented by 16.9%, relative to OOBE-SOL price divergence and the pool's 0.02x turnover.
