SOL-RENDERon Raydium CLMMCLMM
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $24.54K
- APR
- 2.4% APR
- 24h Volume
- $1.14K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.20% fee
- Pool address
- 82RPEfyp…xHyX · observed 2026-10-26
Liquidityhelp
lock$24.54K
Total value locked
$1.14K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up2.4%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 2.9%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Proceed with Caution
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter with a concentrated range based on current SOL-RENDER prices, then rebalance when the position leaves that range or when fee volume no longer justifies the pool's exposure; use a sustained TVL drain or collapse in fee APR as an exit signal.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 2.4% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 2.4% | — | — |
| Volume | $1.14K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $2.28 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 24 SOL-RENDER pools
by AI Farmer Score
#804 of 19497 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 5% of all Solana pools
overall rank #6686 of 148664
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-RENDER liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and RENDER into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but your holdings can shift toward one token and be worth less than simply holding both if their prices move apart.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The pool's yield decomposes into 2.4% fee APR and 0.0% reward APR, with 99%. The current return therefore depends on continued swap volume rather than farm emissions. The reward dependency and emission schedule are not established, so prospective LPs should not assume that any future incentive component will persist; memecoin-pool emissions can decay quickly, changing the balance between fee income and rewards.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading and tick-in-range reading are unavailable, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-RENDER carries token-specific volatility, liquidity-contraction, and adverse-selection risk in addition to ordinary concentrated-liquidity risk. Emission decay is not characterized for this pool, making exit timing more dependent on fee volume, TVL stability, and whether the position remains in range.
tollSOL Context
SOL is one side of the SOL-RENDER pair and generally has deeper liquidity across Solana venues than the memecoin leg. SOL price movement changes the pool's inventory mix and can create impermanent loss when SOL and RENDER move apart; concentrated LPs also face the possibility of becoming one-sided outside their selected range.
tollRENDER Context
RENDER is the memecoin-side asset in this pool and has less broad liquidity than SOL across the Solana market. Sharp RENDER moves can increase fee opportunity while also increasing inventory imbalance, price impact, and the chance that a concentrated position exits its active range.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and RENDER into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but your holdings can shift toward one token and be worth less than simply holding both if their prices move apart.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 82RPEfyp6Xa7bBwUDC4HEQsDDt5777m6uPGLExiQxHyX
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- RENDER (rndrizKT…)
- Created
- 4/20/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current SOL-RENDER return is composed of 2.4% fee APR and 0.0% reward APR, so the stated 2.4% APR is not currently dependent on a reward stream. If incentives are introduced or later decay, only that reward component would fall directly; fee income would still depend on trading volume.
The current SOL-RENDER return is composed of 2.4% fee APR and 0.0% reward APR, so the stated 2.4% APR is not currently dependent on a reward stream. If incentives are introduced or later decay, only that reward component would fall directly; fee income would still depend on trading volume.
The current reward component is 0.0%, while 99% comes from trading fees. If a future incentive program expires, the remaining return would be determined by 2.4% and could be lower if trading activity does not support the current fee rate.
The current reward component is 0.0%, while 99% comes from trading fees. If a future incentive program expires, the remaining return would be determined by 2.4% and could be lower if trading activity does not support the current fee rate.
Risk is elevated because RENDER can move sharply against SOL, causing impermanent loss, one-sided inventory, and concentrated-range inactivity. The pool's recent impermanent-loss and tick-in-range readings are unavailable, so the recent extent of those risks cannot be measured here; $25K TVL also leaves less depth than larger Solana pools.
Risk is elevated because RENDER can move sharply against SOL, causing impermanent loss, one-sided inventory, and concentrated-range inactivity. The pool's recent impermanent-loss and tick-in-range readings are unavailable, so the recent extent of those risks cannot be measured here; $25K TVL also leaves less depth than larger Solana pools.
For SOL-RENDER, consider exiting when TVL drains, fee volume weakens enough to undermine 2.4%, or price leaves your selected range and rebalancing no longer compensates for exposure. A sustained deterioration in the fee-funded 2.4% is a clearer signal than a single volatile trading session.
For SOL-RENDER, consider exiting when TVL drains, fee volume weakens enough to undermine 2.4%, or price leaves your selected range and rebalancing no longer compensates for exposure. A sustained deterioration in the fee-funded 2.4% is a clearer signal than a single volatile trading session.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent loss is unavailable and fee realization changes with volume. The theoretical offset comes from 2.4%, but actual recovery depends on continued trading, the size of the price divergence, and how long the position remains in range.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent loss is unavailable and fee realization changes with volume. The theoretical offset comes from 2.4%, but actual recovery depends on continued trading, the size of the price divergence, and how long the position remains in range.
