Wealthville Score
Verdict EXIT · 70% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 produces an Enter score of 15/100, Hold score of 20/100, and Exit score of 82/100, with the live verdict EXIT and the stated verdict driver ai_engine=hold. Its rank of #730 among 8541 raydium-amm pools places it above many listed pools but does not remove the pool-specific risks: the assessment would weaken if TVL drained, volume fell, or fee yield collapsed, and strengthen only if fee generation remained durable while liquidity and market depth improved.
Computed 2026-09-07 09:33 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$1.09M
Total value locked
$257.80K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up27.8%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -49.0%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Treat this as a fee-monitoring position rather than a reward farm: set a precommitted exit trigger if 24.6% falls below your required return for one week, or if pool liquidity begins a sustained decline; do not add size without checking that fee generation still justifies NUB memecoin exposure.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 27.8% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 24.6% | — | — |
| Volume | $257.80K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $644.49 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 3 nub-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#920 of 61707 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 3% of all Solana pools
overall rank #2247 of 107256
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the nub-SOL liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing NUB and SOL into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but your final holdings can shift toward the token that performs worse, and a memecoin price fall can make withdrawing riskier.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 24.6% fee APR and 3.3% reward APR, with 88% of yield sourced from trading fees. Because the current reward component is zero, emission decay is not presently reducing the displayed APR; future returns remain dependent on trading volume, fee generation, and the pool’s liquidity base.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading and tick-in-range reading are not currently reported, so recent loss experience and range utilization cannot be quantified from this data. As a MEMECOIN pool, NUB-SOL carries material token-price and liquidity risk, while emission decay and incentive changes can reduce future compensation; exit timing matters if volume or liquidity contracts before fees offset price divergence.
tollnub Context
NUB is the memecoin side of this pool, so its price movement relative to SOL determines much of the LP’s inventory shift and impermanent-loss exposure. Liquidity depth for NUB outside this pool is not established by the supplied metrics, which can make exits more sensitive to available market depth and slippage.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the larger reference asset in the pair and provides the pool’s principal comparison point for NUB valuation. SOL price changes still affect the dollar value of the position, while NUB-specific volatility determines how strongly the deposited balances diverge from simply holding NUB and SOL.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing NUB and SOL into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but your final holdings can shift toward the token that performs worse, and a memecoin price fall can make withdrawing riskier.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 83G6VzJzLRCnHBsLATj94VCpRimyyqwuN6ZfL11McADL
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- nub (GtDZKAqv…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
48%
APR
126%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward APR is 3.3%, so the displayed 27.8% is generated by 24.6% in trading fees rather than emissions. Future emission changes therefore have little direct effect unless rewards are introduced later; volume and liquidity determine the current fee yield.
The current reward APR is 3.3%, so the displayed 27.8% is generated by 24.6% in trading fees rather than emissions. Future emission changes therefore have little direct effect unless rewards are introduced later; volume and liquidity determine the current fee yield.
The pool already shows 3.3% reward APR, so there is no current reward stream to lose. If incentives are added and later expire, the remaining return would depend on 24.6% in trading fees, which are currently the source of 88% of yield.
The pool already shows 3.3% reward APR, so there is no current reward stream to lose. If incentives are added and later expire, the remaining return would depend on 24.6% in trading fees, which are currently the source of 88% of yield.
Risk is elevated because NUB can move sharply against SOL and may have limited liquidity outside this pool. A seven-day impermanent-loss result and tick-in-range result are not currently reported, so recent LP damage and range behavior cannot be measured from the available data.
Risk is elevated because NUB can move sharply against SOL and may have limited liquidity outside this pool. A seven-day impermanent-loss result and tick-in-range result are not currently reported, so recent LP damage and range behavior cannot be measured from the available data.
For NUB-SOL, use a predefined trigger such as a sustained decline in pool liquidity, falling trading volume, or 24.6% dropping below your required return for one week. Exit earlier if NUB market depth deteriorates and withdrawing would expose you to worsening slippage.
For NUB-SOL, use a predefined trigger such as a sustained decline in pool liquidity, falling trading volume, or 24.6% dropping below your required return for one week. Exit earlier if NUB market depth deteriorates and withdrawing would expose you to worsening slippage.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent loss is not reported and future volume is uncertain. The position breaks even only when cumulative fee income, currently represented by 24.6%, exceeds the value lost from NUB-SOL price divergence and withdrawal costs.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent loss is not reported and future volume is uncertain. The position breaks even only when cumulative fee income, currently represented by 24.6%, exceeds the value lost from NUB-SOL price divergence and withdrawal costs.
