new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter 15/100, Hold 20/100, and Exit 80/100; the live verdict is EXIT, driven by ai_engine=hold. Its rank of #1207 of 18146 raydium-amm pools places it above many listed pools but does not establish that its return is superior, particularly with $34K liquidity and 0.01x turnover. The assessment would weaken if TVL drains, volume falls further, fee APR collapses, or PEPE volatility makes exit costs and impermanent loss more consequential; it would strengthen only with durable volume and liquidity improvement.
Computed 2026-10-22 23:18 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$34.08K
Total value locked
$480.98
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up2.8%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -3.9%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a narrow range only if you can monitor the position frequently; set a rebalance or exit trigger when PEPE moves materially against SOL or when pool turnover falls below its current 0.01x level, since unavailable range data prevents a reliable passive-range assessment.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 2.8% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 2.8% | — | — |
| Volume | $480.98 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $1.20 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 3 SOL-PEPE pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1502 of 90613 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 3% of all Solana pools
overall rank #3592 of 147092
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-PEPE liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and PEPE into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive a portion of trading fees, but the amount and value of your tokens can change as SOL and PEPE prices move, especially when PEPE demand falls.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The advertised yield decomposes into 2.8% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 99% means current LP yield does not depend on reward emissions, although reward dependency is not established for the pool. With 0.01x turnover and no protocol-median volume comparison available, the fee rate should be treated as sensitive to changes in trading activity rather than as a fixed return.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss data and tick-in-range data are not available, so recent loss history and range utilization cannot be assessed from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-PEPE carries exposure to sharp PEPE price moves, correlated or uncorrelated SOL moves, and liquidity withdrawal during sentiment changes. Emission decay is not currently the main yield risk because rewards contribute no current APR, but exit timing matters if PEPE activity, pool liquidity, or trading volume contracts.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the network asset paired against PEPE and typically has substantially deeper liquidity elsewhere on Solana than this pool's $34K. A SOL move relative to PEPE changes the pool's inventory mix and can create impermanent loss versus simply holding both assets. SOL strength can also leave an LP with more PEPE exposure after rebalancing, while a sharp SOL decline can increase the relative SOL inventory.
tollPEPE Context
PEPE is the pool's memecoin leg and is likely to account for much of the pair's idiosyncratic volatility. Its liquidity outside this pool may be less resilient than SOL's, so a fall in PEPE demand can affect both mark-to-market value and the ability to exit without price impact. Strong PEPE price moves relative to SOL can increase inventory divergence and impermanent loss.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and PEPE into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive a portion of trading fees, but the amount and value of your tokens can change as SOL and PEPE prices move, especially when PEPE demand falls.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 95512Hcjd8ZkjyYninGBBuhwsLrA5sF3Xto8ehtEwyXb
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- PEPE (21Dt6Ne2…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
13%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
3%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Current rewards contribute 0.0% to the total 2.8% APR, while fee income contributes 2.8%. Because 99% of yield comes from fees, emission decay is not currently reducing the displayed APR through a reward component, but it would matter if incentives are introduced later.
Current rewards contribute 0.0% to the total 2.8% APR, while fee income contributes 2.8%. Because 99% of yield comes from fees, emission decay is not currently reducing the displayed APR through a reward component, but it would matter if incentives are introduced later.
The current reward component is 0.0%, so expiration would not remove a current reward contribution from the displayed yield. LP income would remain dependent on 2.8% in trading fees, which can decline if volume falls.
The current reward component is 0.0%, so expiration would not remove a current reward contribution from the displayed yield. LP income would remain dependent on 2.8% in trading fees, which can decline if volume falls.
Risk is material because PEPE can move sharply against SOL, and this pool has $34K liquidity with 0.01x turnover. Recent impermanent-loss and range-utilization readings are unavailable, so the available data cannot quantify how much of that risk has recently occurred.
Risk is material because PEPE can move sharply against SOL, and this pool has $34K liquidity with 0.01x turnover. Recent impermanent-loss and range-utilization readings are unavailable, so the available data cannot quantify how much of that risk has recently occurred.
For SOL-PEPE, consider exiting or rebalancing when PEPE liquidity or trading activity deteriorates, when the position moves outside its intended range, or when fee income no longer compensates for price divergence. A sustained decline from the current 0.01x turnover or a drop in $34K is a concrete warning signal.
For SOL-PEPE, consider exiting or rebalancing when PEPE liquidity or trading activity deteriorates, when the position moves outside its intended range, or when fee income no longer compensates for price divergence. A sustained decline from the current 0.01x turnover or a drop in $34K is a concrete warning signal.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss data and range exposure are unavailable. Ignoring price divergence, recovering an impermanent-loss amount from fees would take approximately that loss divided by the annual fee rate 2.8%, and actual recovery can be slower if volume declines.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss data and range exposure are unavailable. Ignoring price divergence, recovering an impermanent-loss amount from fees would take approximately that loss divided by the annual fee rate 2.8%, and actual recovery can be slower if volume declines.
