new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 47/100, with Enter at 41/100, Hold at 55/100, Exit at 25/100, and a live verdict of HOLD. The ai_engine=hold driver indicates that the pool is assessed as suitable to retain under current conditions, not as a strong new-entry signal; its #491-of-24532 rank among raydium-amm pools places it relatively high in the reported ranking without removing memecoin and liquidity risks. The assessment would change if TVL drained, fee volume collapsed, the fee-only APR fell materially, or new rewards created a temporary APR that later decayed.
Computed 2026-10-26 17:31 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$1.31M
Total value locked
$203.99K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up13.9%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 3.7%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Because this raydium-amm pool does not provide a usable tick-range reading, monitor fee accrual and volume rather than attempting a range adjustment; exit when fee income no longer compensates for execution costs and exposure to AURA volatility, particularly after a sustained contraction in swap activity.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 13.9% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 13.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $203.99K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $509.96 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#3 of 14 SOL-aura pools
by AI Farmer Score
#5365 of 91854 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 7% of all Solana pools
overall rank #10235 of 148664
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-aura liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and AURA into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but the amount and value of your two assets can change, and one asset may lose value faster than the other.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The total APR of 13.9% decomposes into 13.0% from trading fees and 0.9% from rewards. Fee sustainability is 94%, and reward dependency is not established; with no current reward contribution, emission decay is not the present source of APR decline, but any future incentives would require monitoring for schedule changes and exit timing.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading is not reported, and tick-in-range coverage is not reported, so recent path-dependent loss and range behavior cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, AURA price shocks, liquidity withdrawal, and rapid changes in swap flow are central risks for an SOL LP. Emission decay is a relevant future risk if incentives are added: an expiring program would remove that component of yield, making fee volume the remaining basis for deciding whether to exit.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the relatively established asset in the pair and generally has deeper liquidity across Solana venues than a single memecoin pool can provide. SOL appreciation or depreciation changes the pool's relative price against AURA; large moves can increase inventory imbalance and impermanent loss even when swap fees continue accruing.
tollaura Context
AURA is the memecoin side of the pair, and its liquidity depth outside this pool is not established by the supplied metrics. A sharp AURA price move, thin external liquidity, or loss of market attention can increase adverse inventory selection and reduce the volume available to support fee income.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and AURA into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but the amount and value of your two assets can change, and one asset may lose value faster than the other.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 9ViX1VductEoC2wERTSp2TuDxXPwAf69aeET8ENPJpsN
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- aura (DtR4D9Ft…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
9%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
5%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current total APR is 13.9%, consisting of 13.0% in fees and 0.9% in rewards. Since the stated reward contribution is zero, scheduled emission decay is not currently reducing the displayed APR, but any future incentives would decline as their program approaches expiration.
The current total APR is 13.9%, consisting of 13.0% in fees and 0.9% in rewards. Since the stated reward contribution is zero, scheduled emission decay is not currently reducing the displayed APR, but any future incentives would decline as their program approaches expiration.
When incentives expire, the reward component would fall away and the pool's remaining yield would be trading fees. For SOL-AURA, that means evaluating whether 13.0% and the observed 0.16x provide enough compensation for memecoin exposure.
When incentives expire, the reward component would fall away and the pool's remaining yield would be trading fees. For SOL-AURA, that means evaluating whether 13.0% and the observed 0.16x provide enough compensation for memecoin exposure.
Risk is high relative to a SOL pair with a more established second asset because AURA can experience abrupt price and liquidity changes. The pool has $1.3M of liquidity and $204K of 24-hour volume, with total APR of 13.9% dependent on trading fees rather than rewards.
Risk is high relative to a SOL pair with a more established second asset because AURA can experience abrupt price and liquidity changes. The pool has $1.3M of liquidity and $204K of 24-hour volume, with total APR of 13.9% dependent on trading fees rather than rewards.
For SOL-AURA, consider exiting when fee accrual weakens while AURA volatility, liquidity deterioration, or adverse inventory imbalance increases. A sustained drop in trading activity, TVL drain, or collapse in the fee-only component 13.0% would weaken the case for holding.
For SOL-AURA, consider exiting when fee accrual weakens while AURA volatility, liquidity deterioration, or adverse inventory imbalance increases. A sustained drop in trading activity, TVL drain, or collapse in the fee-only component 13.0% would weaken the case for holding.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported. At 13.9% annualized yield, the theoretical fee accumulation is not a guarantee of recovery: the result depends on future fee volume and how SOL and AURA move relative to each other.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported. At 13.9% annualized yield, the theoretical fee accumulation is not a guarantee of recovery: the result depends on future fee volume and how SOL and AURA move relative to each other.
