new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 52/100 places SOL-AURA in a middle-risk, middle-opportunity position rather than identifying it as a clear entry. Enter 46/100 / Hold 59/100 / Exit 22/100 and the live verdict HOLD reflect the ai_engine=hold driver: current fee generation and pool activity support maintaining exposure, but memecoin volatility and incomplete risk history limit conviction. The pool is ranked #302 of 8541 raydium-amm pools, which indicates a relatively strong position within the tracked set without removing asset-specific risk. The assessment would worsen with a TVL drain, sustained volume collapse, lower fee APR, or worsening AURA liquidity, and would improve if fee volume remained stable while liquidity deepened and risk data became more favorable.
Computed 2026-09-07 22:18 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$2.12M
Total value locked
$302.61K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up12.7%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 16.7%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
If the pool supports concentrated liquidity, set a range around the current SOL/AURA price and rebalance when price leaves that range; use a sustained decline from the current 0.14x volume-to-liquidity ratio over two consecutive days as an exit trigger.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 12.7% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 12.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $302.61K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $756.53 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 13 SOL-aura pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1481 of 61707 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 4% of all Solana pools
overall rank #3927 of 107256
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-aura liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and AURA into the pool so other people can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but you can end up with less value than simply holding both tokens if their prices move sharply or AURA becomes difficult to sell.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The displayed Total APR of 12.7% decomposes into 12.0% fee-only APR and 0.7% reward-only APR. 94% of yield comes from trading fees, so the return depends on continued SOL-AURA trading volume rather than emissions. Reward-duration data is not available, and the reward component currently does not provide the pool's yield.
shieldRisk Assessment
A recent seven-day impermanent-loss reading is unavailable, so fee income cannot be evaluated against observed short-term price divergence. Seven-day tick-in-range data is also unavailable, leaving the practical range-management burden unquantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-AURA carries high token-price and liquidity risk; emission decay is less immediate because rewards are not contributing yield, but exit timing still matters if AURA liquidity, SOL price, or trading volume deteriorates.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established, more liquid asset in this pair and has deeper liquidity across Solana venues than AURA. SOL price movement changes the pool's balance and can create impermanent loss for LPs when SOL and AURA move differently, while SOL liquidity elsewhere generally makes SOL-side exits less constrained.
tollaura Context
AURA is the memecoin side of the pair and is likely to determine much of the position's idiosyncratic risk. AURA liquidity outside this pool may be thinner than SOL liquidity, so a sharp AURA move or reduced market depth can increase price impact, inventory imbalance, and exit risk for LPs.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and AURA into the pool so other people can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but you can end up with less value than simply holding both tokens if their prices move sharply or AURA becomes difficult to sell.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 9ViX1VductEoC2wERTSp2TuDxXPwAf69aeET8ENPJpsN
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- aura (DtR4D9Ft…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
369%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
18%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Emission decay would reduce the reward portion, currently represented by 0.7%, but it does not directly reduce the fee portion of 12.7%. Because 94% of yield comes from trading fees, future APR depends primarily on SOL-AURA volume.
Emission decay would reduce the reward portion, currently represented by 0.7%, but it does not directly reduce the fee portion of 12.7%. Because 94% of yield comes from trading fees, future APR depends primarily on SOL-AURA volume.
The reward component would fall further or remain absent, leaving trading fees as the relevant source of LP income. If volume remains at a level consistent with 0.14x, the fee-only component 12.0% would determine returns; if volume declines, APR would decline with it.
The reward component would fall further or remain absent, leaving trading fees as the relevant source of LP income. If volume remains at a level consistent with 0.14x, the fee-only component 12.0% would determine returns; if volume declines, APR would decline with it.
Risk is high relative to a pool containing two established assets because AURA can experience sharp price changes and thinner liquidity. The pool has $2.1M in liquidity and a 0.14x volume-to-liquidity ratio, but recent impermanent-loss and tick-range history is unavailable.
Risk is high relative to a pool containing two established assets because AURA can experience sharp price changes and thinner liquidity. The pool has $2.1M in liquidity and a 0.14x volume-to-liquidity ratio, but recent impermanent-loss and tick-range history is unavailable.
Use a sustained decline in trading activity from the current 0.14x ratio, a material reduction in $2.1M, or a fall in fee income below your required return as exit signals. An exit is also warranted when AURA liquidity deteriorates enough that closing the position would create unacceptable price impact.
Use a sustained decline in trading activity from the current 0.14x ratio, a material reduction in $2.1M, or a fall in fee income below your required return as exit signals. An exit is also warranted when AURA liquidity deteriorates enough that closing the position would create unacceptable price impact.
A reliable break-even time cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable. In a stable-price scenario, fee recovery would depend on 12.0% continuing; any divergence between SOL and AURA can extend the recovery period or prevent fees from fully offsetting the loss.
A reliable break-even time cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable. In a stable-price scenario, fee recovery would depend on 12.0% continuing; any divergence between SOL and AURA can extend the recovery period or prevent fees from fully offsetting the loss.
