new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 49/100 places this pool in a middle assessment rather than a clear entry case: Enter is 43/100, Hold is 56/100, and Exit is 25/100, with the live verdict HOLD. The ai_engine=hold driver is consistent with a fee-funded pool that has usable liquidity but modest trading activity relative to TVL. Its rank of #530 of 8541 raydium-amm pools indicates a relatively high placement within the tracked set, not immunity from memecoin risk. A material TVL drain, further volume deterioration, collapse in fee APR, or adverse GME price behavior would weaken the assessment; sustained volume growth and stable liquidity would support it.
Computed 2026-09-10 05:44 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$1.11M
Total value locked
$76.44K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up7.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 6.9%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Set an exit or rebalance rule before entering: withdraw if rolling volume-to-TVL falls below the current 0.07x baseline or if fee income no longer compensates for the observed GME-SOL price divergence. Because recent range utilization is not reported, do not rely on an assumed tick-range advantage.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 7.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 6.8% | — | — |
| Volume | $76.44K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $191.11 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 GME-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#996 of 63453 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 3% of all Solana pools
overall rank #2865 of 110016
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the GME-SOL liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing GME and SOL into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but the amounts of GME and SOL you withdraw can differ from what you deposited, especially after a large GME price move.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The quoted yield decomposes into 6.8% from swap fees and 0.2% from rewards, for total APR of 7.1%. 97% of yield is fee-derived, so realized returns depend on trading volume rather than an emissions schedule. Reward dependency is not established, and no reward-duration estimate is available.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-in-range readings are not reported, so there is no measured short-term basis for estimating price-divergence loss or range utilization. As a MEMECOIN pool, GME-SOL carries pronounced token-specific price and liquidity risk, particularly when GME moves sharply against SOL. Emission decay is not currently the main risk because the quoted reward component is 0.2%; exit timing should instead account for falling volume, widening execution conditions, or a sustained GME repricing.
tollGME Context
GME is the memecoin side of this pair, so LP exposure combines GME inventory with SOL and changes as arbitrage responds to GME's price. The available pool metrics do not establish GME's liquidity depth elsewhere, making external price discovery and exit conditions important considerations. A sharp GME move can create impermanent loss even when fee income continues.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the paired asset and the principal non-memecoin exposure in GME-SOL. Its broader market liquidity can provide a more established price reference than GME, although this sheet does not quantify SOL liquidity across other venues. SOL appreciation or depreciation relative to GME changes the pool's asset mix and can drive impermanent loss.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing GME and SOL into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but the amounts of GME and SOL you withdraw can differ from what you deposited, especially after a large GME price move.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 9tz6vYKiBDLYx2RnGWC5tESu4pyVE4jD6Tm56352UGte
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- GME (8wXtPeU6…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
412%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
4%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 0.2%, while fee income is 6.8% and total APR is 7.1%. Because the quoted yield is fee-funded, emission decay is not currently the primary source of APR reduction; future rewards, if introduced, would be subject to their own decay schedule.
The current reward component is 0.2%, while fee income is 6.8% and total APR is 7.1%. Because the quoted yield is fee-funded, emission decay is not currently the primary source of APR reduction; future rewards, if introduced, would be subject to their own decay schedule.
The currently quoted reward component is 0.2%, so the stated APR would not lose a currently visible reward stream if incentives ended. Any remaining yield would come from swap fees at 6.8%, which depend on trading volume and may change as liquidity or trader activity changes.
The currently quoted reward component is 0.2%, so the stated APR would not lose a currently visible reward stream if incentives ended. Any remaining yield would come from swap fees at 6.8%, which depend on trading volume and may change as liquidity or trader activity changes.
Risk is high relative to a pool pairing two more established assets because GME can experience sharp price and liquidity changes against SOL. Recent impermanent-loss and tick-range data are not reported, so fee income of 6.8% should not be treated as a reliable offset for an adverse GME move.
Risk is high relative to a pool pairing two more established assets because GME can experience sharp price and liquidity changes against SOL. Recent impermanent-loss and tick-range data are not reported, so fee income of 6.8% should not be treated as a reliable offset for an adverse GME move.
For GME-SOL, predefine an exit signal based on declining rolling volume-to-TVL below 0.07x, a material TVL drain, or a sustained GME move that creates unacceptable divergence from SOL. Also reassess if fee income falls materially below 6.8%, since no reward stream currently supplements it.
For GME-SOL, predefine an exit signal based on declining rolling volume-to-TVL below 0.07x, a material TVL drain, or a sustained GME move that creates unacceptable divergence from SOL. Also reassess if fee income falls materially below 6.8%, since no reward stream currently supplements it.
No defensible break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported and future volume is uncertain. The theoretical offset comes from fee income of 6.8%, but that annualized figure is not guaranteed and can be outweighed by a rapid GME-SOL price divergence.
No defensible break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported and future volume is uncertain. The theoretical offset comes from fee income of 6.8%, but that annualized figure is not guaranteed and can be outweighed by a rapid GME-SOL price divergence.
