WealthVille
GME
G
SOL
S

GME-SOLon Raydium AMM

Chain
Solana
TVL
TVL $1.09M
APR
1.0% APR
24h Volume
$11.51K 24h vol
Pool address
9tz6vYKi…UGte · observed 2026-10-26
17F · Poor

Wealthville Score

Verdict EXIT · 70% confidence

ai_engine=holdscanner=CRITICAL
How this score works →
Enter15

new capital

Hold20

keep position

Exit80

urgency to leave

The Wealthville Score of 17/100 assigns Enter 15/100, Hold 20/100, and Exit 80/100, producing a live verdict of EXIT from the ai_engine=hold driver. Its rank of #1402 of 24532 raydium-amm pools places it in a broad middle segment rather than among the strongest or weakest pools by that measure. The hold reading is consistent with fee-funded yield but limited activity: a TVL drain, a collapse in fee APR, or weaker trading volume would change the assessment toward exit, while sustained volume with stable liquidity could improve it.

Computed 2026-10-26 17:31 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.

Liquidityhelp

lock

$1.09M

Total value locked

$11.51K

24h volume

×0.0 turnover

Yieldhelp

trending_up

1.0%

advertised APR

Fee yield, annualized

≈ 0.1%

adjusted · net of IL (est.)

My Position

account_balance_wallet
Live DataUpdated 30m agoTVL ↓1.0%
block

AI Verdict

Avoid

WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.

check_circleFee-driven yield: 99% of APR from trading fees
warningElevated risk score: 77/100
tips_and_updates

Use a defined GME/SOL price band and set an alert at each boundary; if price leaves the band, withdraw or recenter rather than allowing the position to remain passively exposed. Reassess the position if 0.01x deteriorates alongside falling 24-hour volume.

syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background

table_chart

Performance Breakdown

Metric24h / Day7d / Week30d / Month
Total APR1.0%——
Fee APR1.0%——
Volume$11.51K——
Fees Earned$28.77——

Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.

analytics

Efficiency Metrics

Computed

Deterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.

Sustainable Gross APY
1.8%(trailing 7d fees)
Impermanent-Loss Drag
−1.7%(realized, 30d annualized)
Adjusted Net APY (est.)
0.1%(after IL + repositioning)
Volume / TVL Ratio (24h)
0.01x(protocol avg 2.3x)
Fee Yield per $1 TVL / Day
$0.0000
Fee APR Sustainability
99% from trading fees(sustainable)
leaderboard

Pool Rankings

compare_arrows

#1 of 1 GME-SOL pools

by AI Farmer Score

hub

#4778 of 91854 on raydium-amm

by AI Farmer Score

leaderboard

Top 7% of all Solana pools

overall rank #9455 of 148664

lightbulb

How This Pool Works

Beginner Friendly

This page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the GME-SOL liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.

Providing liquidity means depositing both GME and SOL into the pool so traders can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but the amount and value of your holdings can fall relative to simply holding the two tokens if their prices move apart.

description

Pool Analysis

trending_upYield Source Breakdown

The reported APR decomposes into 1.0% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 99% of yield comes from trading fees, so the return depends on sustained swap activity rather than an emission schedule. Reward dependency is not established, and no reward contribution is currently reported; the fee component can decline if volume falls.

shieldRisk Assessment

Recent impermanent-loss history and the share of time spent inside the active tick range are not established in the supplied data, so LP performance cannot be inferred from a seven-day range or IL reading. As a MEMECOIN pool, GME-SOL is exposed to abrupt GME price moves, shallow liquidity during selloffs, and correlated withdrawals by other LPs. Emission decay is not currently a source of reported income, but any future incentives would require close attention to expiry and exit timing.

tollGME Context

GME is the memecoin side of this pair and supplies the pool's highest idiosyncratic price risk. Its liquidity depth outside this pool is not established here; a sharp GME move against SOL can produce impermanent loss, while weak external liquidity can make rebalancing or exiting more costly.

tollSOL Context

SOL is the base asset and the more established market-liquidity leg of the pair. SOL price changes affect the pool's dollar value and the relative price of GME; a broad SOL move can therefore create impermanent loss even when GME is unchanged in dollar terms.

lightbulbSimple Explanation

Providing liquidity means depositing both GME and SOL into the pool so traders can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but the amount and value of your holdings can fall relative to simply holding the two tokens if their prices move apart.

token

Token Details

GME
GMEGameStopSolana
Explorer

GameStop (GME) — one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

SOL
SOLWrapped SOLSolana

Solana is a high-performance blockchain supporting builders around the world creating crypto apps that scale today.

info

Pool Details

Pool Address
9tz6vYKiBDLYx2RnGWC5tESu4pyVE4jD6Tm56352UGte
Protocol
Raydium AMM
Chain
solana
Fee Tier
—
Pool Type
AMM
Token A
GME (8wXtPeU6…)
Token B
SOL (So111111…)
Created
4/22/2026
lock

Non-Custodial

Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.

source

Verified Data Sources

Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield

psychology

AI-Powered Analysis

Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data

⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.

quiz

Frequently Asked Questions

Emission decay has no current reported effect because reward APR is 0.0% and the reported total APR is 1.0%. The current return is fee-based at 1.0%, so changes in trading activity matter more than emissions.

Emission decay has no current reported effect because reward APR is 0.0% and the reported total APR is 1.0%. The current return is fee-based at 1.0%, so changes in trading activity matter more than emissions.

No current reward contribution is reported, so there is no stated reward stream to subtract from the present APR. If future incentives are added and then expire, the APR would move toward the fee-only level of 1.0%, subject to trading volume.

No current reward contribution is reported, so there is no stated reward stream to subtract from the present APR. If future incentives are added and then expire, the APR would move toward the fee-only level of 1.0%, subject to trading volume.

Risk is high relative to a pool pairing two established assets because GME can move sharply, external liquidity may be limited, and price divergence can create impermanent loss. The pool's yield is fee-funded, but 0.01x indicates that fee generation depends on relatively limited activity against the pool's liquidity.

Risk is high relative to a pool pairing two established assets because GME can move sharply, external liquidity may be limited, and price divergence can create impermanent loss. The pool's yield is fee-funded, but 0.01x indicates that fee generation depends on relatively limited activity against the pool's liquidity.

Use a predefined GME/SOL price boundary and reassess when price leaves it, when pool liquidity drains, or when fee income falls materially below 1.0%. A simultaneous decline in $1.1M and trading volume is a stronger exit signal than a single volatile price move.

Use a predefined GME/SOL price boundary and reassess when price leaves it, when pool liquidity drains, or when fee income falls materially below 1.0%. A simultaneous decline in $1.1M and trading volume is a stronger exit signal than a single volatile price move.

A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is not established. In a stable price relationship, fees accrue at 1.0%, but a large GME/SOL divergence can extend or prevent break-even despite that fee rate.

A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is not established. In a stable price relationship, fees accrue at 1.0%, but a large GME/SOL divergence can extend or prevent break-even despite that fee rate.

Latest insights

Research, Recaps & Solana Alpha

Data-driven yield analysis and weekly market wraps — written for active LPs.

All insights