new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, and Exit at 80/100. That combination supports the live verdict EXIT: the scanner is CRITICAL, the AI engine is hold, and the strong EXIT signal is unopposed. The pool ranks #1710 of 24532 raydium-amm pools, placing it above many listed pools but not overriding its weak volume-to-liquidity use case. The assessment would improve if sustained volume increased without a comparable TVL drain, fee APR strengthened, and the critical scanner signal cleared; it would worsen with a TVL drain, lower fee income, or further deterioration in exit liquidity.
Computed 2026-11-11 13:18 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$225.15K
Total value locked
$511.87
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.3%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -26.0%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a narrow, actively monitored range only if you can rebalance promptly, and exit if volume remains near $512 while TVL contracts or the scanner's CRITICAL signal persists; do not wait for emissions to improve the position because reward APR is already 0.0%.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.3% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.2% | — | — |
| Volume | $511.87 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $1.28 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 SOL- pools
by AI Farmer Score
#11752 of 99294 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 11% of all Solana pools
overall rank #16919 of 157883
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL- liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but your final mix can contain more of one token after prices move, and the memecoin may become difficult to sell quickly.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 0.2% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards, with 100%. Reward dependency is unknown, but the current reward contribution is zero, so there is no displayed emissions component supporting the APR. The fee rate is therefore dependent on continued swap activity, which is currently low relative to pool liquidity; no protocol-median comparison is available for this ratio.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-in-range history are unavailable, so recent loss magnitude and range utilization cannot be assessed from the supplied data. Concentrated-liquidity range exposure should be treated as unmeasured rather than assumed neutral. As a MEMECOIN pool, emission decay is a secondary issue while reward APR is zero; the larger family-specific risks are abrupt token repricing, liquidity withdrawal, and poor exit timing when trading activity falls.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established asset in this pair and generally has deeper liquidity across Solana venues than the paired memecoin. SOL price movement changes the relative price between the two assets; a sustained move in SOL can create impermanent loss even if the pool remains operational. SOL liquidity elsewhere may make rebalancing or exiting easier than for the memecoin leg, but it does not remove pair-level loss risk.
toll Context
is the memecoin side of the pair, so its liquidity and price discovery are likely more dependent on this pool and a limited set of venues. A sharp move or loss of demand in can push the position toward the other asset and make exits more price-sensitive. Its behavior is the main source of token-specific volatility and liquidity risk in this LP.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but your final mix can contain more of one token after prices move, and the memecoin may become difficult to sell quickly.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- A4Wp7FQicQztidaKcxVDnZYcuZJJCaByJdca7WmoQA1G
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- (9qriMjPP…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
19%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Emission decay has no current displayed effect because reward APR is 0.0% and total APR is 0.3%, with 100% from fees. Future changes would matter only if reward emissions are introduced or replaced by fee activity.
Emission decay has no current displayed effect because reward APR is 0.0% and total APR is 0.3%, with 100% from fees. Future changes would matter only if reward emissions are introduced or replaced by fee activity.
The current displayed reward component is 0.0%, so expiration would not remove a currently visible reward contribution. The remaining return would depend on trading fees, currently represented by 0.2% and 100%, while low volume could leave fee income weak.
The current displayed reward component is 0.0%, so expiration would not remove a currently visible reward contribution. The remaining return would depend on trading fees, currently represented by 0.2% and 100%, while low volume could leave fee income weak.
Risk is high because SOL and can diverge sharply, and the memecoin leg may have limited exit liquidity outside this pool. Recent impermanent-loss and range-history data are unavailable, so the size of that risk cannot be estimated from a seven-day record.
Risk is high because SOL and can diverge sharply, and the memecoin leg may have limited exit liquidity outside this pool. Recent impermanent-loss and range-history data are unavailable, so the size of that risk cannot be estimated from a seven-day record.
For this pool, an exit is more defensible if the CRITICAL scanner signal persists, volume stays near $512 while TVL falls, or the memecoin loses external liquidity. The live verdict is EXIT, so waiting for emissions is not a sufficient exit rationale.
For this pool, an exit is more defensible if the CRITICAL scanner signal persists, volume stays near $512 while TVL falls, or the memecoin loses external liquidity. The live verdict is EXIT, so waiting for emissions is not a sufficient exit rationale.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income is tied to low current volume. At 0.3%, any recovery from price divergence would also depend on sustained fees and stable enough relative prices between SOL and .
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income is tied to low current volume. At 0.3%, any recovery from price divergence would also depend on sustained fees and stable enough relative prices between SOL and .
