new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 assigns Enter 15/100, Hold 20/100, and Exit 80/100, producing the live verdict EXIT. That assessment is consistent with the scanner marked CRITICAL and a strong, unopposed EXIT signal, even though ai_engine is hold; the pool ranks #1436 of 8541 raydium-amm pools, so the score places it in a weak relative position rather than treating it as a normal high-activity memecoin venue. A sustained rise in fee-generating volume relative to TVL, deeper liquidity, and removal of the critical scanner condition could improve the assessment; a TVL drain, lower volume, or collapse in fee APR would worsen it.
Computed 2026-09-04 01:52 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$125.50K
Total value locked
$11.20
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.2%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -3.6%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
If entering, use a narrow range only while SOL-BULLY volume remains sufficient, and set an exit trigger for a sustained deterioration in 0.00x or any continued scanner warning; do not wait for a reward program to compensate for falling fee activity.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.2% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.2% | — | — |
| Volume | $11.20 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.03 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 4 SOL-BULLY pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1222 of 61707 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 3% of all Solana pools
overall rank #2806 of 107256
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-BULLY liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and BULLY into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a portion of trading fees, but price changes can leave you with a less valuable mix of the two tokens than if you had simply held them.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield decomposes into 0.2% fee-only APR and 0.0% reward-only APR, with 100% of yield coming from trading fees. Reward dependency is not established, and the current reward component does not contribute to the stated APR, so emission decay is not presently the primary APR driver; any future incentives would need separate monitoring.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range history are not reported, so the LP cannot quantify realized divergence loss or how consistently liquidity has been active around the market price. As a MEMECOIN pool, BULLY price shocks, thin exit liquidity, and rapid shifts in SOL-BULLY demand are material risks. Any emissions introduced later may decay, while an exit should be considered before incentives weaken or trading activity falls enough that fees no longer offset inventory divergence.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base asset in this pair and generally has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana markets than BULLY. SOL price moves change the pool's relative price and can leave the LP holding more BULLY after SOL rises or more SOL after BULLY rises, creating divergence exposure even when the pool remains active.
tollBULLY Context
BULLY is the memecoin side of the pair, so its liquidity and price discovery are more concentrated in this pool and related venues than SOL's. A sharp BULLY move, declining attention, or a thin sell-side market can increase inventory imbalance and make exiting the LP position more costly.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and BULLY into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a portion of trading fees, but price changes can leave you with a less valuable mix of the two tokens than if you had simply held them.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- A88BtP7EEXYPKgbwvFByMnm5NoM2bKs6s1o1F5u6GohB
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- BULLY (79yTpy8u…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
9%
APR
103%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current APR is 0.2%, split between 0.2% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, with 100% of yield from fees. Because no current reward component contributes to the stated APR, emission decay is not currently reducing the displayed yield, but a future incentive program could decline over time.
The current APR is 0.2%, split between 0.2% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, with 100% of yield from fees. Because no current reward component contributes to the stated APR, emission decay is not currently reducing the displayed yield, but a future incentive program could decline over time.
The reward portion would fall to zero if it were active, leaving fee income as the basis for LP returns. For SOL-BULLY, the stated reward-only APR is 0.0% and fee-only APR is 0.2%, so the pool's economics depend on whether its low trading activity can support fees without incentives.
The reward portion would fall to zero if it were active, leaving fee income as the basis for LP returns. For SOL-BULLY, the stated reward-only APR is 0.0% and fee-only APR is 0.2%, so the pool's economics depend on whether its low trading activity can support fees without incentives.
Risk is high because BULLY can move sharply, its exit liquidity may be thinner than SOL's, and the pool's 0.00x turnover indicates limited recent trading relative to liquidity. The displayed Total APR is 0.2%, so fee income may be insufficient to offset large inventory divergence.
Risk is high because BULLY can move sharply, its exit liquidity may be thinner than SOL's, and the pool's 0.00x turnover indicates limited recent trading relative to liquidity. The displayed Total APR is 0.2%, so fee income may be insufficient to offset large inventory divergence.
For SOL-BULLY, an exit is reasonable when the scanner remains CRITICAL, the live verdict remains EXIT, or 0.00x deteriorates and fees no longer justify the exposure. Exiting before a sharp BULLY repricing or a decaying incentive schedule can reduce the chance of holding an increasingly one-sided inventory.
For SOL-BULLY, an exit is reasonable when the scanner remains CRITICAL, the live verdict remains EXIT, or 0.00x deteriorates and fees no longer justify the exposure. Exiting before a sharp BULLY repricing or a decaying incentive schedule can reduce the chance of holding an increasingly one-sided inventory.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported. With fee-only APR of 0.2% and Total APR of 0.2%, break-even depends on future trading fees, the size and persistence of SOL-BULLY price divergence, and whether liquidity remains usable.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported. With fee-only APR of 0.2% and Total APR of 0.2%, break-even depends on future trading fees, the size and persistence of SOL-BULLY price divergence, and whether liquidity remains usable.
