new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 places this pool below its Enter score of 15/100 and Hold score of 20/100, while the Exit score is 80/100; the live verdict is therefore EXIT. Its rank of #2192 of 18146 raydium-amm pools is consistent with a weak relative profile, especially because ai_engine reports hold but the scanner is CRITICAL and the strong EXIT signal is unopposed. The assessment would improve with sustained volume relative to TVL, deeper usable liquidity, and evidence that fee generation persists; a TVL drain, lower turnover, or collapse in fee yield would worsen it.
Computed 2026-10-28 06:39 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$117.33K
Total value locked
$177.25
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.2%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 0.1%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Treat the live EXIT as the exit trigger: do not widen or add to the position while it remains active, and if already providing liquidity, reduce exposure unless sustained turnover improves and the scanner no longer reports a critical condition.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.2% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.2% | — | — |
| Volume | $177.25 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.44 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 PENG-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#15144 of 93745 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 15% of all Solana pools
overall rank #21799 of 150817
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the PENG-SOL liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing PENG and SOL into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but you can end up with more of the weaker-performing token and withdraw less value than if you had simply held both assets.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated APR decomposes into 0.2% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 100% means LP economics currently depend on swap fees rather than token emissions; reward availability and any remaining emission schedule are not established.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history is not reported, and tick-in-range history is also unavailable, so neither recent inventory divergence nor range utilization can be validated. As a MEMECOIN pool, PENG-SOL carries sharp price-move and liquidity-contraction risk; emission decay is not the main current risk because the reward component is 0.0%, while exit timing matters if PENG demand or pool liquidity weakens.
tollPENG Context
PENG is the memecoin side of this pair and is likely to determine most of the pool's idiosyncratic price and liquidity risk. The supplied data does not establish deeper external liquidity for PENG, so a sharp PENG move against SOL can leave the LP holding more PENG after adverse price movement and make exit execution more difficult.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base asset against which PENG's value is measured in this pool, and its broader market liquidity is generally deeper than this pool's. A SOL move can still change the pair's relative price and shift the LP's inventory, while a stable SOL market does not remove the risk of PENG-specific decline.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing PENG and SOL into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but you can end up with more of the weaker-performing token and withdraw less value than if you had simply held both assets.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- AxBDdiMK9hRPLMPM7k6nCPC1gRARgXQHNejfP2LvNGr6
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- PENG (A3eME5Ce…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
12%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
4%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 0.0%, while fee income contributes 0.2% to the total 0.2%. Because the stated yield is 100% fee-funded, emission decay has limited current effect unless rewards are introduced or the displayed reward component changes.
The current reward component is 0.0%, while fee income contributes 0.2% to the total 0.2%. Because the stated yield is 100% fee-funded, emission decay has limited current effect unless rewards are introduced or the displayed reward component changes.
There is currently no stated reward contribution beyond 0.0%, so an incentive expiry would not remove a material reward component from the displayed APR. The remaining return would depend on 0.2% in trading fees and could fall if volume remains weak.
There is currently no stated reward contribution beyond 0.0%, so an incentive expiry would not remove a material reward component from the displayed APR. The remaining return would depend on 0.2% in trading fees and could fall if volume remains weak.
Risk is high because PENG can move sharply against SOL, causing inventory imbalance and impermanent loss while making exits harder in thin liquidity. The pool shows $117K, 0.00x turnover relative to liquidity, and 0.2% total APR, so fee income may not compensate for a large PENG move.
Risk is high because PENG can move sharply against SOL, causing inventory imbalance and impermanent loss while making exits harder in thin liquidity. The pool shows $117K, 0.00x turnover relative to liquidity, and 0.2% total APR, so fee income may not compensate for a large PENG move.
For this pool, EXIT is the current exit signal, reinforced by a critical scanner result and an unopposed strong EXIT signal. An LP should reassess or reduce exposure if turnover falls further, liquidity drains, fee income weakens, or PENG loses demand against SOL.
For this pool, EXIT is the current exit signal, reinforced by a critical scanner result and an unopposed strong EXIT signal. An LP should reassess or reduce exposure if turnover falls further, liquidity drains, fee income weakens, or PENG loses demand against SOL.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported and the pool's fee income is only 0.2% within 0.2%. At 0.00x turnover relative to liquidity, recovery depends heavily on future trading volume and whether PENG returns toward its entry price relative to SOL.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported and the pool's fee income is only 0.2% within 0.2%. At 0.00x turnover relative to liquidity, recovery depends heavily on future trading volume and whether PENG returns toward its entry price relative to SOL.
