new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 40/100 gives SOL-CAT a live verdict of HOLD, with Enter at 35/100, Hold at 47/100, and Exit at 34/100. The ai_engine=hold driver indicates a neutral assessment rather than a strong entry signal; the pool ranks #730 of 8541 raydium-amm pools, placing it ahead of many listed pools but not among the highest-ranked alternatives. The assessment would change if TVL drained, swap volume fell enough to reduce 26.0%, fee income collapsed, or CAT volatility increased losses; sustained volume and deeper liquidity could support a stronger view.
Computed 2026-09-06 08:43 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$39.56K
Total value locked
$14.74K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up29.7%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 8.4%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a defined exit trigger: withdraw if pool TVL falls materially from $40K or if the volume-to-TVL ratio declines from 0.37x for several consecutive days. Because range history is unavailable, use a deliberately broad range and review it after large SOL/CAT price moves rather than assuming the position remains efficiently deployed.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 29.7% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 26.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $14.74K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $36.85 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 SOL-CAT pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1163 of 61707 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 3% of all Solana pools
overall rank #2579 of 107256
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-CAT liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and CAT into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but your holdings can become more concentrated in whichever token performs worse, and the pool's small size can make withdrawals harder during a sell-off.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The total APR of 29.7% decomposes into 26.0% from trading fees and 3.7% from rewards. 88% of yield is therefore fee-funded, while the reward dependency and lifecycle are not established. The reported APR should be treated as dependent on future swap volume rather than as a guaranteed distribution.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss estimate and tick-in-range history are unavailable, so recent loss from SOL-CAT price divergence and the share of liquidity exposed within the active range cannot be quantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, CAT-specific price shocks, thin liquidity, and rapid changes in swap demand can dominate fee income. Emission decay is not currently the main stated risk because rewards contribute no reported APR, but exit timing still matters if CAT liquidity or market interest contracts.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established network asset in this pair and generally has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana venues than CAT. SOL price moves relative to CAT change the pool's asset mix and can create impermanent loss even when SOL itself remains liquid elsewhere. A large SOL move can also shift the position's value away from the intended balance before fees compensate for that divergence.
tollCAT Context
CAT is the pool's memecoin component, so its liquidity and price discovery are likely more dependent on this pool and a smaller set of venues than SOL's. A CAT repricing against SOL can cause inventory to accumulate in the falling asset while arbitrageurs rebalance the pool. Thin CAT liquidity can make exiting the LP position materially different from exiting a spot CAT position.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and CAT into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but your holdings can become more concentrated in whichever token performs worse, and the pool's small size can make withdrawals harder during a sell-off.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- AxPuePyTfJx3eMDtmtCMi3X3pAto2V74VeSJ9SCKgmY3
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- CAT (3joMReCC…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
8%
APR
50%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The reported total APR is 29.7%, consisting of 26.0% in fees and 3.7% in rewards. Since rewards contribute no reported APR, emission decay would not currently reduce the stated total unless the reward configuration changes; fee income still depends on future trading volume.
The reported total APR is 29.7%, consisting of 26.0% in fees and 3.7% in rewards. Since rewards contribute no reported APR, emission decay would not currently reduce the stated total unless the reward configuration changes; fee income still depends on future trading volume.
The current reported reward component is 3.7%, so expiration of incentives would not remove a reported source of yield. LP income would continue to depend on trading fees of 26.0%, which can fall if volume declines.
The current reported reward component is 3.7%, so expiration of incentives would not remove a reported source of yield. LP income would continue to depend on trading fees of 26.0%, which can fall if volume declines.
Risk is elevated because CAT can move sharply against SOL, liquidity is only $40K, and the pool's volume-to-TVL ratio is 0.37x. The recent impermanent-loss and range-placement history is unavailable, so the fee APR of 26.0% cannot be compared with a measured recent loss rate.
Risk is elevated because CAT can move sharply against SOL, liquidity is only $40K, and the pool's volume-to-TVL ratio is 0.37x. The recent impermanent-loss and range-placement history is unavailable, so the fee APR of 26.0% cannot be compared with a measured recent loss rate.
For SOL-CAT, practical exit signals include a sustained decline in TVL from $40K, weaker volume than the level implied by 0.37x, or a sharp CAT move that leaves the position concentrated in CAT. An LP should also reassess if fee income no longer justifies the pool's liquidity and price risks.
For SOL-CAT, practical exit signals include a sustained decline in TVL from $40K, weaker volume than the level implied by 0.37x, or a sharp CAT move that leaves the position concentrated in CAT. An LP should also reassess if fee income no longer justifies the pool's liquidity and price risks.
There is no defensible break-even period from the available data because seven-day impermanent loss is unavailable and future fee volume is uncertain. The nominal annualized fee component is 26.0%, but actual recovery time depends on how long that fee rate persists and whether SOL and CAT prices converge again.
There is no defensible break-even period from the available data because seven-day impermanent loss is unavailable and future fee volume is uncertain. The nominal annualized fee component is 26.0%, but actual recovery time depends on how long that fee rate persists and whether SOL and CAT prices converge again.
