
IO-USDCon Raydium CLMMCLMMActive
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $63.87K
- APR
- 48.3% APR
- 24h Volume
- $30.05K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.25% fee
- Pool address
- DeC8Twoq…6uxe · observed 2026-09-05
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 49/100 produces a live HOLD verdict, with Enter at 44/100, Hold at 57/100, and Exit at 24/100. The ai_engine=hold driver indicates that the system currently favors monitoring the position rather than initiating or closing it, while the pool ranks #801 of 4410 raydium-clmm pools. That ranking is context rather than a guarantee: a sustained TVL drain, falling fee generation, reduced volume relative to 0.47x, or a collapse in 39.4% would weaken the assessment; persistent fee volume and stable liquidity would support it.
Computed 2026-09-05 20:02 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$63.87K
Total value locked
$30.05K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up48.3%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 37.1%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter with a relatively narrow range centered on the current IO-USDC price, monitor the position at least daily, and rebalance or exit when price reaches a range boundary rather than allowing the position to remain inactive outside the range.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 48.3% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 39.4% | — | — |
| Volume | $30.05K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $75.14 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 8 IO-USDC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#564 of 14926 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 4% of all Solana pools
overall rank #4087 of 107256
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the IO-USDC liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing IO and USDC into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but a large move in IO can leave you holding a different mix of IO and USDC than you deposited.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated Total APR of 48.3% decomposes into 39.4% from trading fees and 8.9% from rewards. 82% of the yield is fee-derived, so the return depends on continued swap activity rather than a current emissions program. Reward dependency is not established, and the current reward component provides no basis for assuming an additional incentive stream.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range history are not supplied, so realized price-divergence loss and range utilization cannot be validated from the available data. IO-USDC is a MEMECOIN pool: IO price shocks, thin liquidity, and rapid changes in trader interest can move the position out of range or increase inventory imbalance. Emission decay is not currently the main risk because the stated reward component is zero, but future incentives and exit timing are uncertain; LPs should plan for potentially limited liquidity when reducing exposure.
tollIO Context
IO is the volatile side of this pair and supplies most of the directional price risk for the LP. The supplied data does not establish IO's liquidity depth elsewhere, so a sharp IO move can create inventory concentration and make orderly exit timing more important. Rising IO relative to USDC can leave the LP with more USDC after rebalancing, while falling IO can leave more IO.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is the stable quote asset against which IO's value is measured and generally provides the lower-volatility side of the pair. Its liquidity depth elsewhere is not established by the supplied data, but USDC's stability does not remove the risk created by IO's price movement. As IO moves, the concentrated position can accumulate one asset and reduce exposure to the other.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing IO and USDC into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but a large move in IO can leave you holding a different mix of IO and USDC than you deposited.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- DeC8TwoqTD8q5iQ9eG8L5syAvzadA4yMXpSgxywA6uxe
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- IO (BZLbGTNC…)
- Token B
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Created
- 4/20/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
0%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 8.9%, while total stated APR is 48.3% and fee APR is 39.4%. Because the current yield is fee-derived, emission decay does not presently account for the stated return, but any future incentive program would need separate verification.
The current reward component is 8.9%, while total stated APR is 48.3% and fee APR is 39.4%. Because the current yield is fee-derived, emission decay does not presently account for the stated return, but any future incentive program would need separate verification.
The pool currently reports 8.9% from rewards and 39.4% from fees, so the stated return is already dependent on trading fees rather than active farm emissions. If incentives are introduced and later expire, the reward portion would disappear and the remaining return would depend on fee activity.
The pool currently reports 8.9% from rewards and 39.4% from fees, so the stated return is already dependent on trading fees rather than active farm emissions. If incentives are introduced and later expire, the reward portion would disappear and the remaining return would depend on fee activity.
Risk is elevated because IO can move sharply while pool liquidity is only $64K against $30K of recent volume. The position is exposed to impermanent loss, range inactivity, IO liquidity conditions, and the possibility that exit timing worsens during a rapid memecoin selloff.
Risk is elevated because IO can move sharply while pool liquidity is only $64K against $30K of recent volume. The position is exposed to impermanent loss, range inactivity, IO liquidity conditions, and the possibility that exit timing worsens during a rapid memecoin selloff.
Consider exiting when IO approaches the edge of your selected range, when fee generation no longer justifies the price and inventory risk, or when liquidity and trading activity deteriorate materially from the $64K and 0.47x baseline. A sustained drop in 39.4% or a worsening score and verdict would also be a reason to reassess.
Consider exiting when IO approaches the edge of your selected range, when fee generation no longer justifies the price and inventory risk, or when liquidity and trading activity deteriorate materially from the $64K and 0.47x baseline. A sustained drop in 39.4% or a worsening score and verdict would also be a reason to reassess.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range-usage history are unavailable. 39.4% is an annualized fee estimate rather than a guarantee, so break-even depends on future volume, IO price movement, time spent in range, and exit prices.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range-usage history are unavailable. 39.4% is an annualized fee estimate rather than a guarantee, so break-even depends on future volume, IO price movement, time spent in range, and exit prices.




