new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 is below its Enter score of 15/100 and Hold score of 20/100, while the Exit score is 80/100; the live verdict is EXIT. That assessment is consistent with scanner=CRITICAL and a strong, unopposed EXIT signal, even though ai_engine=hold. The pool ranks #699 of 2403 raydium-amm pools, which places it above many listed pools by rank but does not override its current risk signals. A sustained increase in TVL and volume, removal of the critical scanner finding, and demonstrably persistent fee generation could change the assessment; a TVL drain or collapse in fee income would reinforce it.
Computed 2026-07-23 21:17 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$49.82K
Total value locked
$764.30
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.7%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -1.9%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
If entering, use a narrow range only after checking current order flow, and set an exit trigger for any further TVL drain, a sustained decline in fee volume, or persistence of the scanner's CRITICAL signal; do not wait for emissions to justify staying.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.7% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.7% | — | — |
| Volume | $764.30 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $1.91 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 5 SOL-GrokCoin pools
by AI Farmer Score
#648 of 36746 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 3% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1997 of 68818
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-GrokCoin liquidity pool on raydium-amm. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and GROKCOIN into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the amount is small and your holdings can lose value relative to simply holding the two tokens if their prices move differently.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated APR decomposes into 0.7% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards, with 100% of yield sourced from fees. Reward dependency and lifecycle are not established, and there is no current basis for assuming time-bound reward income. With low observed volume relative to TVL, the fee component can fall if trading activity declines.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range exposure are not reported, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-GROKCOIN has additional token-specific liquidity and price-discovery risk, while emission decay and uncertain farm persistence make exit timing more important than relying on a headline APR. The low volume base also leaves fee income sensitive to a small number of trades.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the pool's established asset and generally has deeper liquidity and broader price discovery across Solana markets than GROKCOIN. SOL price moves relative to GROKCOIN change the pool's inventory composition and can create impermanent loss even when SOL liquidity elsewhere remains strong.
tollGrokCoin Context
GROKCOIN is the less established side of this pair, so its external liquidity, market depth, and price discovery should be verified separately rather than inferred from this pool's TVL. A sharp GROKCOIN move or a reduction in its market liquidity can increase execution loss, inventory imbalance, and exit cost for this LP.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and GROKCOIN into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the amount is small and your holdings can lose value relative to simply holding the two tokens if their prices move differently.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- DsktL4KrnnsupVfjb1uW4aoudgN8ooz4DtepPSAbmdN3
- Protocol
- raydium-amm
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- GrokCoin (3MadWqcN…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
open_in_newView all raydium-amm pools →By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, so the displayed 0.7% is derived from 0.7% rather than active emissions. If rewards are introduced and later decay, only that reward component would fall; fee income would still depend on trading volume.
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, so the displayed 0.7% is derived from 0.7% rather than active emissions. If rewards are introduced and later decay, only that reward component would fall; fee income would still depend on trading volume.
Because reward income is currently 0.0%, an incentive expiry would not remove a measurable reward component from the current APR. The remaining yield would be 0.7%, and it could decline if the pool's low trading activity weakens.
Because reward income is currently 0.0%, an incentive expiry would not remove a measurable reward component from the current APR. The remaining yield would be 0.7%, and it could decline if the pool's low trading activity weakens.
Risk is material because SOL has broad external liquidity while GROKCOIN may have thinner or less reliable price discovery. This pool has TVL of $50K, 24-hour volume of $764, a 0.02x turnover ratio, and a current live verdict of EXIT.
Risk is material because SOL has broad external liquidity while GROKCOIN may have thinner or less reliable price discovery. This pool has TVL of $50K, 24-hour volume of $764, a 0.02x turnover ratio, and a current live verdict of EXIT.
For SOL-GROKCOIN, an exit is more defensible if the scanner remains CRITICAL, the unopposed EXIT signal persists, TVL drains, or fee volume falls further. Waiting for reward emissions is not a strong reason to remain because reward-only APR is 0.0%.
For SOL-GROKCOIN, an exit is more defensible if the scanner remains CRITICAL, the unopposed EXIT signal persists, TVL drains, or fee volume falls further. Waiting for reward emissions is not a strong reason to remain because reward-only APR is 0.0%.
A precise break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and price divergence is unknown. At a constant fee-only APR of 0.7%, ignoring compounding, fees alone would take roughly 143 years to offset a hypothetical 100% loss, before accounting for further price changes or withdrawal costs.
A precise break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and price divergence is unknown. At a constant fee-only APR of 0.7%, ignoring compounding, fees alone would take roughly 143 years to offset a hypothetical 100% loss, before accounting for further price changes or withdrawal costs.
