new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, and Exit at 80/100; the live verdict is EXIT. That aligns with the ai_engine=hold driver: the pool is not being treated as an immediate entry, but it is not flagged for an outright exit, despite ranking #1710 of 18146 raydium-amm pools. The assessment would weaken if TVL drains, fee generation collapses, or CDR liquidity deteriorates; it would improve if sustained volume raised 0.00x and supported a higher fee-only return without a comparable increase in price risk.
Computed 2026-10-22 18:45 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$379.02K
Total value locked
$144.58
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.4%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -77.5%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a monitored range and rebalance when the position reaches roughly 80% of either range boundary; exit if TVL contracts materially or volume remains too low to support the fee-only APR.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.4% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.4% | — | — |
| Volume | $144.58 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $2.89 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SOL-CDR pools
by AI Farmer Score
#3240 of 90613 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 5% of all Solana pools
overall rank #6936 of 147092
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-CDR liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and CDR into a shared trading pool and receiving a share of swap fees. You can earn 0.4%, but price changes can leave you with a different mix of SOL and CDR than you deposited, and the memecoin side can be difficult to sell during a sharp decline.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield decomposes into 0.4% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 100% of yield comes from trading fees, so there is no current reward stream supporting the quoted APR. Reward dependency and the duration of any future incentives are not established, making emission changes a factor to monitor rather than a quantified source of current return.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss and concentrated-liquidity range coverage are not available in the supplied metrics, so N/A and N/A cannot be used to estimate recent positioning risk. As a MEMECOIN pool, CDR can experience sharp price moves, thin exit liquidity, and one-sided inventory after a selloff. Emission decay is not currently the primary risk because the reward component is zero; exit timing should instead focus on falling volume, shrinking TVL, or weakening CDR liquidity before incentives become relevant.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base asset and the deeper-liquidity side of this pair, with substantial liquidity elsewhere on Solana. SOL appreciation or depreciation relative to CDR changes the pool's inventory mix and can create impermanent loss versus simply holding both assets, while SOL's broader liquidity can make its side easier to exit.
tollCDR Context
CDR is the memecoin side of the pair and is the primary source of idiosyncratic token and liquidity risk. Its liquidity depth outside this pool is not established by the supplied metrics, so a sharp CDR move can leave the LP holding more CDR while fees remain limited by the pool's low trading activity.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and CDR into a shared trading pool and receiving a share of swap fees. You can earn 0.4%, but price changes can leave you with a different mix of SOL and CDR than you deposited, and the memecoin side can be difficult to sell during a sharp decline.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- E36cUEJLfPYBPtQiXLAM9aVGejtQG4vs2aArd41JxnLD
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- CDR (HZqjjeso…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
18%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
6%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only component is 0.0%, while fee income contributes 0.4% and 100% of yield is fee-funded. If future incentives are introduced and then decay, the reward portion would fall; the present quoted APR is not currently supported by rewards.
The current reward-only component is 0.0%, while fee income contributes 0.4% and 100% of yield is fee-funded. If future incentives are introduced and then decay, the reward portion would fall; the present quoted APR is not currently supported by rewards.
Because the current reward component is 0.0%, expiration would not directly remove a current reward stream. The remaining return would depend on 0.4% from trading fees, which is sensitive to the pool's low activity and 0.00x volume-to-TVL ratio.
Because the current reward component is 0.0%, expiration would not directly remove a current reward stream. The remaining return would depend on 0.4% from trading fees, which is sensitive to the pool's low activity and 0.00x volume-to-TVL ratio.
Risk is elevated because CDR can move sharply and may have less exit liquidity than SOL. With TVL at $379K and volume-to-TVL at 0.00x, fee income may be insufficient to offset adverse price movement or inventory imbalance.
Risk is elevated because CDR can move sharply and may have less exit liquidity than SOL. With TVL at $379K and volume-to-TVL at 0.00x, fee income may be insufficient to offset adverse price movement or inventory imbalance.
Consider exiting when TVL or trading activity deteriorates, when CDR momentum becomes disorderly, or when the position approaches a range boundary that you cannot actively manage. For this pool, a sustained fall in fee generation matters because 100% of current yield is fee-funded.
Consider exiting when TVL or trading activity deteriorates, when CDR momentum becomes disorderly, or when the position approaches a range boundary that you cannot actively manage. For this pool, a sustained fall in fee generation matters because 100% of current yield is fee-funded.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss data is not available and fee income depends on changing volume. The theoretical recovery period would depend on whether 0.4% remains available and whether CDR and SOL later converge in relative price.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss data is not available and fee income depends on changing volume. The theoretical recovery period would depend on whether 0.4% remains available and whether CDR and SOL later converge in relative price.
