Wealthville Score
Verdict AVOID · 58% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 19/100, with Enter at 10/100, Hold at 30/100, and Exit at 60/100; the live verdict is AVOID. Its rank of #602 among 2403 raydium-amm pools places it in a broad middle-to-lower segment, while the stated drivers—high risk at 67/100 and weak yield—make the verdict unfavorable despite fee-only income. The assessment would improve if sustained volume increased fees without requiring emissions, liquidity deepened, and risk moderated; it would deteriorate with a TVL drain, further volume loss, or a collapse in fee generation.
Computed 2026-07-23 21:17 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$163.91K
Total value locked
$8.32K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up1.2%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -11.1%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a deliberately narrow, actively managed range only if you can monitor the pool; exit or reposition when trading activity no longer produces fee accrual sufficient to justify holding additional STUPID exposure, rather than waiting for an incentive change.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 1.2% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 1.2% | — | — |
| Volume | $8.32K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $20.80 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SOL-Stupid pools
by AI Farmer Score
#15760 of 34958 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 30% of all Solana pools
overall rank #19594 of 66494
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-Stupid liquidity pool on raydium-amm. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and STUPID into a shared trading pool and receiving a portion of trading fees. Your holdings change as traders buy and sell, so you can end up with more of the token that performed worse, and the fee income may not compensate for that loss.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The displayed yield decomposes into 1.2% fee-only APR and 0.0% reward-only APR. 99% of the yield comes from trading fees, while no current reward contribution is shown; reward dependency remains unclear. Because this is a MEMECOIN pool, any future incentive emissions should be treated as temporary support rather than a durable return source.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history is not available, and seven-day tick-in-range history is also unavailable, so recent price divergence and range efficiency cannot be quantified. The main family-specific risk is MEMECOIN emission decay and exit timing: if incentives appear, their value can fall quickly, while a sharp STUPID move against SOL can leave the LP holding more of the weaker asset. The risk score is 67/100, consistent with a position that requires active monitoring rather than passive holding.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base asset in this pool and has materially deeper liquidity across Solana than this pair alone. SOL price movement changes the relative value of the position: when SOL rises or falls sharply against STUPID, rebalancing by the AMM can increase exposure to the asset that has underperformed. SOL's broader liquidity may reduce execution friction elsewhere, but it does not remove pair-level impermanent loss.
tollStupid Context
STUPID is the memecoin side of the pair, so its liquidity and price discovery are more dependent on this pool and other limited venues than SOL's. A rapid STUPID decline can leave the LP with a larger STUPID share after arbitrage, while a rapid rise can cause the pool to sell STUPID into the move. That asymmetry makes exit timing and external STUPID liquidity important.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and STUPID into a shared trading pool and receiving a portion of trading fees. Your holdings change as traders buy and sell, so you can end up with more of the token that performed worse, and the fee income may not compensate for that loss.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- F1FMsNYuCNRHTDVjSkNbiZLp4qv6r6oQyMRJM9ZYdkm3
- Protocol
- raydium-amm
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- Stupid (9RjwNo6h…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
open_in_newView all raydium-amm pools →By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current return is 1.2%, consisting of 1.2% from fees and 0.0% from rewards. Since reward contribution is currently absent, emission decay is not supporting the displayed APR now, but any future incentives could decline and leave fee income as the main return.
The current return is 1.2%, consisting of 1.2% from fees and 0.0% from rewards. Since reward contribution is currently absent, emission decay is not supporting the displayed APR now, but any future incentives could decline and leave fee income as the main return.
There is no current reward contribution shown, so the pool is already economically dependent on 1.2% rather than emissions. If incentives are introduced and later expire, the remaining return would be trading fees, which are tied to the pool's 0.05x volume-to-TVL ratio.
There is no current reward contribution shown, so the pool is already economically dependent on 1.2% rather than emissions. If incentives are introduced and later expire, the remaining return would be trading fees, which are tied to the pool's 0.05x volume-to-TVL ratio.
The risk score is 67/100, and the pair combines SOL with a memecoin whose price and liquidity can change abruptly. Seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-range histories are unavailable, so recent loss and range behavior cannot be measured from the supplied data.
The risk score is 67/100, and the pair combines SOL with a memecoin whose price and liquidity can change abruptly. Seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-range histories are unavailable, so recent loss and range behavior cannot be measured from the supplied data.
For SOL-STUPID, consider exiting or repositioning when fee accrual no longer justifies the added STUPID exposure, when pool liquidity begins draining, or when STUPID becomes difficult to sell elsewhere. A deterioration in the 0.05x volume-to-TVL ratio is a direct warning that fee support is weakening.
For SOL-STUPID, consider exiting or repositioning when fee accrual no longer justifies the added STUPID exposure, when pool liquidity begins draining, or when STUPID becomes difficult to sell elsewhere. A deterioration in the 0.05x volume-to-TVL ratio is a direct warning that fee support is weakening.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and trading activity is limited to a 0.05x volume-to-TVL ratio. The relevant comparison is whether accumulated 1.2% fees eventually exceed the position's price-divergence loss, which is not guaranteed by the 1.2% APR.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and trading activity is limited to a 0.05x volume-to-TVL ratio. The relevant comparison is whether accumulated 1.2% fees eventually exceed the position's price-divergence loss, which is not guaranteed by the 1.2% APR.
