SOL-RENDERon Raydium CLMMCLMMActive
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $365.71K
- APR
- 27.5% APR
- 24h Volume
- $106.81K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.25% fee
- Pool address
- FZ8MJvdT…JkNL · observed 2026-10-26
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 55/100 produces an Enter score of 49/100, Hold score of 62/100, and Exit score of 18/100, with the live verdict at HOLD. For this pool, the ai_engine=hold driver indicates that the available signals support monitoring an existing position more than initiating or exiting aggressively. Its rank of #1278 of 9963 raydium-clmm pools places it above many pools in the tracked set, but does not remove memecoin-specific liquidity and price risks. A sustained TVL drain, materially lower volume, collapse in 24.3%, or evidence that fees no longer compensate for inventory divergence would change the assessment.
Computed 2026-10-26 18:32 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$365.71K
Total value locked
$106.81K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up27.5%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 31.8%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a defined review trigger: reassess the position when the pool's observed volume-to-TVL ratio falls materially below 0.29x or when realized fee income no longer offsets the inventory imbalance caused by the SOL-RENDER price move; exit rather than wait for a range recovery if liquidity is draining.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 27.5% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 24.3% | — | — |
| Volume | $106.81K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $267.02 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 24 SOL-RENDER pools
by AI Farmer Score
#795 of 19497 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 5% of all Solana pools
overall rank #6586 of 148664
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-RENDER liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and RENDER into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive trading fees, but the amounts of SOL and RENDER you own can change as their prices move, and the pool can become harder to exit if trading activity declines.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The displayed yield decomposes into 24.3% from trading fees and 3.2% from rewards. 88% of yield comes from trading fees, so current returns depend on continued SOL-RENDER order flow rather than a known subsidy schedule. Reward dependency is not established, and the pool's lifecycle is also unspecified; any future emissions would need to be evaluated for decay and durability rather than treated as permanent yield.
shieldRisk Assessment
A recent seven-day impermanent-loss reading is unavailable, and recent tick-in-range history is also unavailable, so realized range efficiency cannot be quantified from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-RENDER carries elevated demand, volatility, and liquidity-regime risk: fee income can fall as attention fades, while price divergence can leave an LP holding more of the weaker asset. Emission decay, if incentives are introduced, increases the importance of exiting before liquidity and trading activity deteriorate.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base asset in this pair and generally has deeper liquidity across Solana markets than this pool's $366K. SOL price moves determine one side of the LP's inventory and can create divergence against RENDER; large moves may increase fee opportunity while also increasing inventory imbalance and rebalancing risk.
tollRENDER Context
RENDER is the paired asset and has liquidity across other markets, but its depth and execution quality can vary by venue and market conditions. A sharp RENDER move relative to SOL can push the position toward one asset, while declining RENDER activity can reduce the fee flow supporting 24.3%.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and RENDER into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive trading fees, but the amounts of SOL and RENDER you own can change as their prices move, and the pool can become harder to exit if trading activity declines.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- FZ8MJvdTPbp8juhtFCCzb7LsKunhexgzShGQ59SUJkNL
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- RENDER (rndrizKT…)
- Created
- 4/20/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current display assigns 3.2% to rewards and 24.3% to fees, so the stated APR is not currently relying on a positive reward component. If emissions are added and later decay, the reward portion would fall while fee income would still depend on SOL-RENDER trading volume.
The current display assigns 3.2% to rewards and 24.3% to fees, so the stated APR is not currently relying on a positive reward component. If emissions are added and later decay, the reward portion would fall while fee income would still depend on SOL-RENDER trading volume.
The current reward component is 3.2%, while 24.3% comes from swaps. If incentives expire, the pool's remaining yield would be determined by trading fees, and lower incentives could reduce liquidity, volume, and exit quality.
The current reward component is 3.2%, while 24.3% comes from swaps. If incentives expire, the pool's remaining yield would be determined by trading fees, and lower incentives could reduce liquidity, volume, and exit quality.
Risk is high relative to a deeper, more established pair because memecoin demand and liquidity can change quickly. This pool has $366K in liquidity, $107K in 24-hour volume, and fee income of 24.3%, but unavailable recent impermanent-loss and range-history data limits confidence in estimating realized risk.
Risk is high relative to a deeper, more established pair because memecoin demand and liquidity can change quickly. This pool has $366K in liquidity, $107K in 24-hour volume, and fee income of 24.3%, but unavailable recent impermanent-loss and range-history data limits confidence in estimating realized risk.
Consider exiting when volume-to-TVL activity falls materially below 0.29x, liquidity is draining, or 24.3% declines enough that fees no longer justify inventory and price-divergence risk. A deteriorating score or a change from HOLD would add evidence, but should not replace checking pool liquidity and execution conditions.
Consider exiting when volume-to-TVL activity falls materially below 0.29x, liquidity is draining, or 24.3% declines enough that fees no longer justify inventory and price-divergence risk. A deteriorating score or a change from HOLD would add evidence, but should not replace checking pool liquidity and execution conditions.
There is no defensible break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable. The relevant comparison is whether future fee income near 24.3% can offset the position's actual inventory loss from SOL-RENDER price divergence; the displayed APR alone does not guarantee that outcome.
There is no defensible break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable. The relevant comparison is whether future fee income near 24.3% can offset the position's actual inventory loss from SOL-RENDER price divergence; the displayed APR alone does not guarantee that outcome.
