SOL-RENDERon Raydium CLMMCLMMActive
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $269.31K
- APR
- 35.7% APR
- 24h Volume
- $91.41K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.25% fee
- Pool address
- FZ8MJvdT…JkNL · observed 2026-09-06
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 46/100, with Enter at 41/100, Hold at 51/100, and Exit at 30/100; the live verdict is HOLD. That assessment places SOL-RENDER at rank #84 of 4410 raydium-clmm pools, while the stated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold, indicating a monitor-and-maintain view rather than a clear new-entry signal. The assessment would change if TVL drained, volume-driven fees collapsed, price divergence produced measurable IL, or sustained trading activity and fee generation weakened enough to reduce 30.6%.
Computed 2026-09-06 08:14 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$269.31K
Total value locked
$91.41K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up35.7%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 16.0%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter with a deliberately narrow range only if you can monitor it, and rebalance or exit when the position leaves that range or when 30.6% falls materially while SOL-RENDER volume weakens; do not wait for an unreported range or IL statistic to confirm deterioration.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 35.7% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 30.6% | — | — |
| Volume | $91.41K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $228.53 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 23 SOL-RENDER pools
by AI Farmer Score
#436 of 14926 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 3% of all Solana pools
overall rank #3047 of 107256
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-RENDER liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and RENDER into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the pool can leave you holding more of the token that has fallen relative to the other, and your position may stop earning actively if its price moves outside its chosen range.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield breaks down into a fee-only APR of 30.6% and a reward-only APR of 5.2%, with fee sustainability at 86%. Because the current reward contribution is absent, trading activity rather than token emissions is the stated source of the APR. Reward dependency and any future incentive schedule are not established, so prospective LPs should not assume that the fee rate will persist if volume or liquidity conditions change.
shieldRisk Assessment
A recent seven-day impermanent-loss reading is not reported, and recent tick-in-range exposure is also not reported, limiting direct measurement of how efficiently the position has remained active. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-RENDER carries high sensitivity to abrupt RENDER-SOL price divergence, which can leave an LP holding more of the underperforming asset while fees may not offset the move. There is no current reward APR to cushion that risk; if emissions are introduced later, emission decay and incentive expiry would make exit timing important.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the pool's base asset and provides the main reference for valuing RENDER against a widely traded Solana token. SOL has deeper liquidity across the broader Solana market than this pool, so sharp SOL moves can quickly move the position outside a chosen range and change its asset mix. An LP is exposed not only to RENDER's direction but also to the relative performance of SOL and RENDER.
tollRENDER Context
RENDER is the pool's more specialized and memecoin-family exposure, with liquidity distributed across other venues and pools rather than concentrated only here. A strong RENDER move against SOL can generate fees while also increasing inventory imbalance or causing the position to leave its active range. A sharp RENDER decline can leave the LP with greater RENDER exposure after the price move.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and RENDER into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the pool can leave you holding more of the token that has fallen relative to the other, and your position may stop earning actively if its price moves outside its chosen range.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- FZ8MJvdTPbp8juhtFCCzb7LsKunhexgzShGQ59SUJkNL
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- RENDER (rndrizKT…)
- Created
- 4/20/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
0%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only APR is 5.2%, so the stated APR of 35.7% is currently fee-driven rather than emission-driven. If incentives are added, emission decay could reduce the reward portion while 30.6% would still depend on trading volume.
The current reward-only APR is 5.2%, so the stated APR of 35.7% is currently fee-driven rather than emission-driven. If incentives are added, emission decay could reduce the reward portion while 30.6% would still depend on trading volume.
There is currently no stated reward contribution, so incentive expiry is not the present source of the pool's yield. If incentives are introduced and later expire, the remaining APR would be determined primarily by 30.6% and the pool's trading activity.
There is currently no stated reward contribution, so incentive expiry is not the present source of the pool's yield. If incentives are introduced and later expire, the remaining APR would be determined primarily by 30.6% and the pool's trading activity.
Risk is elevated because RENDER can move sharply relative to SOL, changing the assets held by the LP and potentially taking the position outside its active range. Recent impermanent-loss and tick-in-range readings are not reported, so the latest realized exposure cannot be quantified from the supplied metrics.
Risk is elevated because RENDER can move sharply relative to SOL, changing the assets held by the LP and potentially taking the position outside its active range. Recent impermanent-loss and tick-in-range readings are not reported, so the latest realized exposure cannot be quantified from the supplied metrics.
Consider exiting when SOL-RENDER leaves your selected range, when volume no longer supports 30.6%, or when a sharp RENDER-SOL divergence makes the inventory imbalance unacceptable. If future incentives are added, their decay or expiry is another exit-timing signal.
Consider exiting when SOL-RENDER leaves your selected range, when volume no longer supports 30.6%, or when a sharp RENDER-SOL divergence makes the inventory imbalance unacceptable. If future incentives are added, their decay or expiry is another exit-timing signal.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent loss is not reported and future fee generation is variable. The relevant comparison is whether cumulative fees at 30.6% can offset the position's price-divergence loss after accounting for range exits and rebalancing.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent loss is not reported and future fee generation is variable. The relevant comparison is whether cumulative fees at 30.6% can offset the position's price-divergence loss after accounting for range exits and rebalancing.
