SEAS-USDCon Raydium CLMMCLMM
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $954.79K
- APR
- 0.6% APR
- 24h Volume
- $5.92K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.25% fee
- Pool address
- Fc6NsEMa…gZvy · observed 2026-10-26
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The 17/100 Wealthville Score, with Enter 15/100, Hold 20/100, and Exit 80/100, places this pool in an exit-oriented state rather than a new-entry or passive-hold state. The live verdict is EXIT: the scanner is CRITICAL, the strong EXIT signal is unopposed, and the AI engine is only HOLD, so the aggregate warning outweighs the less severe model output. Its rank of #1884 of 9963 raydium-clmm pools indicates a relatively weak position within the tracked set, not a standalone guarantee of loss. The assessment would improve only with sustained volume and fee generation, stable or growing TVL, and removal of the critical scanner condition; a TVL drain or further yield collapse would reinforce the exit case.
Computed 2026-10-26 12:27 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$954.79K
Total value locked
$5.92K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.6%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -0.8%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a monitored range around the current SEAS-USDC price, and rebalance or exit when price leaves that range; treat a continuing EXIT verdict or a material TVL drain as an exit trigger rather than waiting for emissions to improve.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.6% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.6% | — | — |
| Volume | $5.92K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $14.80 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#3 of 3 SEAS-USDC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1433 of 19497 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 13% of all Solana pools
overall rank #18884 of 148664
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SEAS-USDC liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SEAS and USDC into a trading pool and receiving a share of swap fees. Your holdings can shift toward SEAS or USDC as the price moves, and the current return is mainly fee-based rather than reward-based.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The pool decomposes into 0.6% from trading fees and 0.0% from incentives, with 100% of yield coming from fees. No active reward contribution is represented in the current APR, and the duration or dependency of any future emissions is not established. With low volume relative to liquidity, fee generation is currently a limited basis for LP returns.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading and tick-in-range history are not available, so recent price divergence and range efficiency cannot be quantified from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, SEAS-USDC is exposed to sharp SEAS repricing, concentrated-liquidity range exits, and liquidity deterioration as speculative interest fades. Emission decay and exit timing matter: any temporary incentives can weaken quickly, while waiting for volume or price momentum to recover can increase exposure to adverse selection.
tollSEAS Context
SEAS is the volatile asset in this pair, so its price movement drives most inventory changes and impermanent-loss exposure for the LP. The supplied pool data does not establish SEAS liquidity depth elsewhere; thin external liquidity would make large price moves and difficult exits more consequential. A SEAS rally or selloff can move the position out of its chosen range and leave the LP holding a less balanced inventory.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is the stable-value side of the pair and generally provides the quote asset used to measure SEAS price and swap demand. Its broader Solana liquidity is typically deeper than a memecoin's, but this does not remove the pool's dependence on SEAS liquidity and active trading. When SEAS falls, the LP can accumulate SEAS while its USDC allocation declines; when SEAS rises, the reverse inventory effect applies.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SEAS and USDC into a trading pool and receiving a share of swap fees. Your holdings can shift toward SEAS or USDC as the price moves, and the current return is mainly fee-based rather than reward-based.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- Fc6NsEMazYGWWQCR6UQSSx8AXV85Qcoa5taJmRbHgZvy
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- SEAS (7GdpaeSz…)
- Token B
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Created
- 4/20/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current pool return is 0.6%, split between 0.6% in fees and 0.0% in rewards. Because the reward component is currently absent, further emission decay would not be the main driver of the displayed APR unless incentives are introduced or restored.
The current pool return is 0.6%, split between 0.6% in fees and 0.0% in rewards. Because the reward component is currently absent, further emission decay would not be the main driver of the displayed APR unless incentives are introduced or restored.
When incentives expire, only trading fees remain, represented here by 0.6%, while the reward component falls to 0.0%. With 100% of yield already sourced from fees, the position becomes even more dependent on sustained swap volume rather than emissions.
When incentives expire, only trading fees remain, represented here by 0.6%, while the reward component falls to 0.0%. With 100% of yield already sourced from fees, the position becomes even more dependent on sustained swap volume rather than emissions.
Risk is high because SEAS can reprice sharply, reducing fee income and pushing a concentrated position outside its active range. Recent impermanent-loss and tick-range readings are not available, so the pool's recent price and range behavior cannot be measured from the supplied data.
Risk is high because SEAS can reprice sharply, reducing fee income and pushing a concentrated position outside its active range. Recent impermanent-loss and tick-range readings are not available, so the pool's recent price and range behavior cannot be measured from the supplied data.
For SEAS-USDC, an exit is more defensible when the live verdict remains EXIT, the scanner remains critical, volume fails to support 0.6%, or TVL begins to drain. Leaving the range or losing the ability to exit efficiently is also a practical trigger.
For SEAS-USDC, an exit is more defensible when the live verdict remains EXIT, the scanner remains critical, volume fails to support 0.6%, or TVL begins to drain. Leaving the range or losing the ability to exit efficiently is also a practical trigger.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because the pool's recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and current volume is low relative to liquidity at 0.01x. At 0.6%, recovery depends on sustained fees and SEAS price behavior, so there is no dependable fixed timeline.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because the pool's recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and current volume is low relative to liquidity at 0.01x. At 0.6%, recovery depends on sustained fees and SEAS price behavior, so there is no dependable fixed timeline.
