PIPE-USDCon Raydium CLMMCLMM
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $30.82K
- APR
- 0.5% APR
- 24h Volume
- $6.07K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.01% fee
- Pool address
- GsgEAtxS…Dh1W · observed 2026-11-03
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, and Exit at 80/100; the live verdict is EXIT, driven by ai_engine=hold. That places this pool at rank #1499 of 8415 raydium-clmm pools and indicates a conditional hold rather than a strong entry signal: fee generation is present, but memecoin price and liquidity risks remain material. The assessment would change if TVL drained, volume weakened enough to collapse fee income, reward assumptions became less reliable, or PIPE volatility caused persistent out-of-range exposure; sustained fee growth and deeper liquidity would support a stronger assessment.
Computed 2026-11-03 08:33 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$30.82K
Total value locked
$6.07K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.5%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -98.3%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a deliberately narrow range only when you can monitor PIPE frequently, and rebalance or exit when price leaves the range or when observed volume no longer supports the fee return represented by 0.5%. Do not widen the range solely to avoid management if that materially reduces fee density.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.5% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.5% | — | — |
| Volume | $6.07K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.61 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 PIPE-USDC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1775 of 19999 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 14% of all Solana pools
overall rank #20571 of 153992
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the PIPE-USDC liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing PIPE and USDC into a shared trading pool so swaps can use your funds. You receive part of the trading fees, but PIPE's price can change your holdings and may leave your funds inactive if the price moves outside your chosen range.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated return decomposes into 0.5% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 100% means the current return is not being supplemented by reported incentives. Reward dependency is not established, so the APR should not be treated as durable beyond the observed trading activity; for a MEMECOIN pool, any future emissions would be subject to decay and should be evaluated against exit timing rather than assumed as a permanent yield source.
shieldRisk Assessment
A recent seven-day impermanent-loss reading and tick-in-range reading are not available, so realized loss and range utilization cannot be verified from the supplied data. The main pool-specific risks are PIPE price shocks, concentrated-liquidity exposure, and fee decline if volume falls relative to liquidity. As a MEMECOIN pool, emission decay can reduce any future reward component quickly, while weakening liquidity or fading market attention can make an earlier exit preferable to waiting for fee recovery.
tollPIPE Context
PIPE is the volatile asset in this pair and supplies the pool's primary directional and price-range risk. Liquidity depth for PIPE elsewhere is not established by these pool metrics; a sharp PIPE move can therefore create inventory imbalance and impermanent loss for LPs, even when fee income is positive. PIPE strength or weakness also determines how quickly a concentrated position moves out of its active range.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is the dollar-denominated side of the pair and generally serves as the accounting reference for the position. Its role does not remove PIPE-specific risk: when PIPE moves materially, the LP can end up holding a changed mix of PIPE and USDC and may stop earning fees outside its selected range. USDC liquidity elsewhere is not assessed by the supplied pool data.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing PIPE and USDC into a shared trading pool so swaps can use your funds. You receive part of the trading fees, but PIPE's price can change your holdings and may leave your funds inactive if the price moves outside your chosen range.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- GsgEAtxSKrgMC43NseBLbAQz8zNtCcn1eJmmhxzqDh1W
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- PIPE (7s9MoSt7…)
- Token B
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Created
- 4/20/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current return is shown as 0.5% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, with 100% of yield from fees. If emissions are introduced or reduced, the reward portion can decay while fee income remains dependent on $6K volume and $31K liquidity.
The current return is shown as 0.5% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, with 100% of yield from fees. If emissions are introduced or reduced, the reward portion can decay while fee income remains dependent on $6K volume and $31K liquidity.
The reward component would fall toward zero, leaving trading fees as the relevant return source. Because the current reward dependency is not established, compare future fee income represented by 0.5% with PIPE price and range risk before continuing.
The reward component would fall toward zero, leaving trading fees as the relevant return source. Because the current reward dependency is not established, compare future fee income represented by 0.5% with PIPE price and range risk before continuing.
Risk is high relative to a stablecoin or major-token pair because PIPE can move sharply, causing impermanent loss, inventory imbalance, and out-of-range exposure. The supplied data does not provide a recent impermanent-loss or tick-utilization reading, so those risks cannot be quantified here.
Risk is high relative to a stablecoin or major-token pair because PIPE can move sharply, causing impermanent loss, inventory imbalance, and out-of-range exposure. The supplied data does not provide a recent impermanent-loss or tick-utilization reading, so those risks cannot be quantified here.
Consider exiting when PIPE leaves the active range, when liquidity or volume declines enough to undermine 0.5%, or when the pool's fee return no longer compensates for concentration and price risk. Emission decay or a TVL drain is an additional exit signal rather than a reason to wait for recovery.
Consider exiting when PIPE leaves the active range, when liquidity or volume declines enough to undermine 0.5%, or when the pool's fee return no longer compensates for concentration and price risk. Emission decay or a TVL drain is an additional exit signal rather than a reason to wait for recovery.
There is no defensible break-even estimate because recent impermanent loss and range-utilization data are unavailable. At a constant fee rate of 0.5%, fee recovery would depend on continued volume, stable execution inside the range, and no further adverse PIPE move; the annualized figure is not a guarantee of that outcome.
There is no defensible break-even estimate because recent impermanent loss and range-utilization data are unavailable. At a constant fee rate of 0.5%, fee recovery would depend on continued volume, stable execution inside the range, and no further adverse PIPE move; the annualized figure is not a guarantee of that outcome.
