SOL-Bonkon Raydium CLMMCLMM
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $28.79K
- APR
- 5.8% APR
- 24h Volume
- $1.08K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.25% fee
- Pool address
- GtKKKs3y…xYsN · observed 2026-11-02
Wealthville Score
Verdict AVOID · 60% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 19/100 places this pool in a middling but not strong position: Enter is 10/100, Hold is 30/100, and Exit is 60/100, producing the live verdict AVOID. Its automated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold, and the pool ranks #1738 of 9963 raydium-clmm pools, so the ranking indicates it is not among the strongest alternatives despite the hold assessment. The assessment would change if TVL drained, fee yield collapsed, price volatility impaired range utilization, or sustained volume materially improved the fee base.
Computed 2026-11-02 01:59 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$28.79K
Total value locked
$1.08K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up5.8%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 19.5%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter with a narrow active range centered on the current SOL-BONK price, then rebalance only when price leaves that range or when 0.04x remains weak while fees no longer justify the position; exit if the pool's liquidity falls materially or fee generation collapses.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 5.8% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 5.6% | — | — |
| Volume | $1.08K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $2.70 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#5 of 24 SOL-Bonk pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1104 of 19841 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 12% of all Solana pools
overall rank #17057 of 152129
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-Bonk liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and BONK into the pool so other users can trade between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but the value of what you withdraw can differ from simply holding SOL and BONK, especially when BONK moves sharply.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 5.6% from trading fees and 0.2% from rewards, with 97% of yield sourced from fees. Reward dependency is not established, and the current reward component provides no meaningful support to the quoted total APR. Emission decay is therefore not the present driver of returns, but any future incentive program would require checking its duration and exit timing rather than treating it as permanent yield.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history is represented by N/A, while the share of time liquidity stayed in range is represented by N/A; neither should be treated as a forecast of future performance. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-BONK is exposed to abrupt BONK sentiment shifts, asymmetric price moves, and liquidity withdrawal during risk-off periods. Emission decay is a secondary risk while rewards are absent, but an LP still needs an exit plan because fee income can fall quickly if trading activity or the pool's liquidity base contracts.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base asset paired against BONK and has materially deeper liquidity across Solana markets than this pool. That broader liquidity can support execution elsewhere, but SOL price moves still change the relative price of the pair and can push a concentrated LP position out of range. A strong SOL move against BONK may therefore increase rebalancing needs and impermanent-loss exposure even when SOL itself remains liquid.
tollBonk Context
BONK is the memecoin side of the pair, with liquidity and demand more dependent on market attention than SOL. Its price can move sharply or gap across trading venues, making the pool's relatively small liquidity base more sensitive to order flow. BONK appreciation or depreciation relative to SOL changes the asset mix withdrawn by the LP and can leave the position concentrated in the weaker-performing asset.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and BONK into the pool so other users can trade between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but the value of what you withdraw can differ from simply holding SOL and BONK, especially when BONK moves sharply.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- GtKKKs3yaPdHbQd2aZS4SfWhy8zQ988BJGnKNndLxYsN
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- Bonk (DezXAZ8z…)
- Created
- 4/20/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current return is decomposed into 5.6% in fees and 0.2% in rewards, so emission decay is not currently the main source of the quoted 5.8%. If incentives are introduced later, their decay could reduce the reward component while fee income would still depend on trading volume.
The current return is decomposed into 5.6% in fees and 0.2% in rewards, so emission decay is not currently the main source of the quoted 5.8%. If incentives are introduced later, their decay could reduce the reward component while fee income would still depend on trading volume.
Because the current reward component is 0.2%, the pool is already primarily dependent on 5.6% from trading fees. If future incentives expire, total LP income would rely more completely on fee flow and could decline if trading activity does not compensate.
Because the current reward component is 0.2%, the pool is already primarily dependent on 5.6% from trading fees. If future incentives expire, total LP income would rely more completely on fee flow and could decline if trading activity does not compensate.
Risk is high relative to a major-asset pair because BONK can move abruptly and liquidity can thin during weak sentiment. This pool also has $29K, $1K in recent volume, recent IL shown as N/A, and range exposure shown as N/A.
Risk is high relative to a major-asset pair because BONK can move abruptly and liquidity can thin during weak sentiment. This pool also has $29K, $1K in recent volume, recent IL shown as N/A, and range exposure shown as N/A.
For SOL-BONK, consider exiting when price leaves the active range and the expected fee income no longer compensates for rebalancing and price risk. A sustained decline in 0.04x, a TVL drain, or a collapse in 5.6% are concrete deterioration signals.
For SOL-BONK, consider exiting when price leaves the active range and the expected fee income no longer compensates for rebalancing and price risk. A sustained decline in 0.04x, a TVL drain, or a collapse in 5.6% are concrete deterioration signals.
There is no reliable break-even period from the available data because recent IL history is not established and fee income varies with volume. Use 5.6% only as an annualized reference, then compare actual accumulated fees with the value gap versus holding SOL and BONK.
There is no reliable break-even period from the available data because recent IL history is not established and fee income varies with volume. Use 5.6% only as an annualized reference, then compare actual accumulated fees with the value gap versus holding SOL and BONK.
