Wealthville Score
Verdict AVOID · 60% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 19/100 sits below the Enter and Hold reference levels of 10/100 and 30/100, while the Exit reference is 60/100; the live verdict is AVOID. That result reflects the combination of high risk at 84/100 and weak yield, despite 98% fee sustainability. The pool ranks #1544 of 24532 raydium-amm pools, placing it well below the stronger part of the pool set. The assessment would improve if sustained volume materially increased fee APR while risk declined; a TVL drain, weaker volume, or yield collapse would reinforce the current verdict.
Computed 2026-11-13 15:09 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$157.36K
Total value locked
$7.22K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up4.3%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -19.5%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Treat a sustained decline in 0.05x or a fall in 4.2% as an exit trigger, and reassess immediately if MUSHU liquidity thins or its price moves sharply against SOL; this pool does not provide emissions to offset weaker fee production.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 4.3% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 4.2% | — | — |
| Volume | $7.22K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $18.04 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SOL-MUSHU pools
by AI Farmer Score
#5310 of 99294 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 7% of all Solana pools
overall rank #9973 of 157883
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-MUSHU liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and MUSHU into a shared pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the value of your deposit can fall if the two tokens move differently, especially because MUSHU is a memecoin.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 4.2% fee APR and 0.1% reward APR. 98% of the stated yield comes from trading fees, so the return depends on organic volume rather than emissions. Reward duration is not established, and the absence of a reward contribution means emission decay is not currently the main APR variable.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent loss history is unavailable, as is the seven-day tick-in-range record, so recent range behavior cannot be assessed from these metrics. This is a MEMECOIN pool: MUSHU price shocks, attention decay, liquidity withdrawal, and adverse SOL-MUSHU divergence can dominate fee income. Any future emissions would be subject to decay, and exit timing matters because declining meme activity can reduce both fees and available liquidity before an LP can exit efficiently.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established asset in this pair and has substantially broader liquidity across Solana venues than this pool. SOL price movement changes the pool's relative inventory: a strong SOL move against MUSHU can increase divergence loss even when the pool continues generating fees. SOL's broader market liquidity may make the SOL leg easier to hedge or exit than the MUSHU leg.
tollMUSHU Context
MUSHU is the pool's memecoin exposure, so its value and liquidity are more dependent on token-specific attention than SOL's. A sharp MUSHU repricing can create impermanent loss and may leave the LP holding more of the weaker asset after arbitrage. Liquidity elsewhere should be checked separately rather than inferred from this pool's $157K.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and MUSHU into a shared pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the value of your deposit can fall if the two tokens move differently, especially because MUSHU is a memecoin.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- HXH2Wp1NQ2iCo2RV5hQzmcirh7tvjsGWYKchY8ZjbbR7
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- MUSHU (5Jr9hGmJ…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
21%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The reward component is 0.1%, so current APR is not being supported by emissions. Any future emissions would decay over time, leaving fee income of 4.2% as the main recurring source of return.
The reward component is 0.1%, so current APR is not being supported by emissions. Any future emissions would decay over time, leaving fee income of 4.2% as the main recurring source of return.
Because reward APR is already 0.1%, incentive expiry would not remove a current reward stream from the stated return. The pool would continue to depend on trading fees, with 98% of yield currently attributed to fees.
Because reward APR is already 0.1%, incentive expiry would not remove a current reward stream from the stated return. The pool would continue to depend on trading fees, with 98% of yield currently attributed to fees.
The reported risk score is 84/100, and MUSHU can experience larger price and liquidity changes than SOL. Impermanent loss history and recent tick exposure are not available, so the downside cannot be bounded from those measures.
The reported risk score is 84/100, and MUSHU can experience larger price and liquidity changes than SOL. Impermanent loss history and recent tick exposure are not available, so the downside cannot be bounded from those measures.
For SOL-MUSHU, review an exit when 0.05x remains weak, 4.2% no longer compensates for your risk threshold, or MUSHU liquidity and attention deteriorate. A sharp SOL-MUSHU price divergence is also a reason to reassess before liquidity conditions worsen.
For SOL-MUSHU, review an exit when 0.05x remains weak, 4.2% no longer compensates for your risk threshold, or MUSHU liquidity and attention deteriorate. A sharp SOL-MUSHU price divergence is also a reason to reassess before liquidity conditions worsen.
A precise period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent loss history is unavailable. Ignoring price changes and costs, a simple gross fee-only payback estimate is approximately 1 divided by 4.2% years; actual break-even requires cumulative fees to exceed impermanent loss and withdrawal costs.
A precise period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent loss history is unavailable. Ignoring price changes and costs, a simple gross fee-only payback estimate is approximately 1 divided by 4.2% years; actual break-even requires cumulative fees to exceed impermanent loss and withdrawal costs.
