new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 47/100, with Enter at 41/100, Hold at 55/100, and Exit at 25/100; the live verdict is HOLD, driven by ai_engine=hold. Its rank of #1029 of 18146 raydium-amm pools places it above many listed pools but does not offset the pool's low activity or memecoin-specific risks. The assessment would weaken if TVL drains, fee generation falls, or liquidity becomes harder to exit; it would improve if sustained volume increased fee income without relying on temporary emissions.
Computed 2026-10-23 00:12 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$573.52K
Total value locked
$10.15K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up2.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -94.7%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a volume-and-liquidity exit rule: reassess the position if 0.02x declines materially or if TVL begins draining, and avoid widening the range while WOULD is making a one-sided move. Since recent range coverage is unavailable, enter with a deliberately limited allocation and set the exit trigger before depositing.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 2.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 2.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $10.15K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $25.38 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 4 SOL-WOULD pools
by AI Farmer Score
#2899 of 90613 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 5% of all Solana pools
overall rank #6324 of 147092
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-WOULD liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and WOULD into a shared pool used by traders, then receiving a share of trading fees. Your holdings can end up weighted more toward whichever token falls or rises differently, and the pool's current return comes from trading rather than a separate reward payment.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield is decomposed into fee-only APR of 2.0% and reward-only APR of 0.0%. Fee sustainability is 99%, so current returns depend on swap activity rather than a reward program. Reward dependency is not established in the available data; because this is a MEMECOIN pool, any future emissions should be treated as temporary and assessed against an exit plan rather than assumed to persist.
shieldRisk Assessment
A reliable recent impermanent-loss reading and tick-in-range reading are unavailable, so recent loss behavior and price-range coverage cannot be quantified. The MEMECOIN classification adds token-specific volatility, liquidity contraction, and sharp exit-risk concerns; emission decay can reduce any future incentive contribution, while low trading activity may leave fee income insufficient to offset adverse price divergence. Reassess before remaining exposed through a large token move or a sustained decline in pool liquidity.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established settlement and liquidity asset in this pair, with substantially deeper liquidity across Solana markets than WOULD. For this LP, a SOL price move changes the required asset balance and can create impermanent loss when SOL and WOULD move differently; SOL's broader liquidity may make its leg easier to hedge than the memecoin leg.
tollWOULD Context
WOULD is the memecoin side of the pair, so its external liquidity, holder concentration, and price discovery should be checked separately from this pool. A sharp WOULD rally or drawdown can rebalance the position toward SOL or WOULD and increase impermanent-loss exposure, while thin outside liquidity can make exiting the WOULD inventory more difficult.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and WOULD into a shared pool used by traders, then receiving a share of trading fees. Your holdings can end up weighted more toward whichever token falls or rises differently, and the pool's current return comes from trading rather than a separate reward payment.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- Hga48QXtpCgLSTsfysDirPJzq8aoBPjvePUgmXhFGDro
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- WOULD (J1Wpmugr…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
13%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
3%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Current returns are shown as fee-only 2.0% plus reward-only 0.0%, with 99% of yield from trading fees. If future incentives are introduced or reduced, the reward component could change, but the available data does not establish a reward schedule.
Current returns are shown as fee-only 2.0% plus reward-only 0.0%, with 99% of yield from trading fees. If future incentives are introduced or reduced, the reward component could change, but the available data does not establish a reward schedule.
The reward-only component would fall away, leaving trading fees as the return source. For SOL-WOULD, that would make realized income depend on 0.02x and the volume represented by $10K, rather than on emissions.
The reward-only component would fall away, leaving trading fees as the return source. For SOL-WOULD, that would make realized income depend on 0.02x and the volume represented by $10K, rather than on emissions.
Risk is elevated because WOULD can experience abrupt price changes and thinner external liquidity than SOL. Recent impermanent-loss and range-coverage readings are unavailable, while low activity at 0.02x may limit fee compensation for price divergence.
Risk is elevated because WOULD can experience abrupt price changes and thinner external liquidity than SOL. Recent impermanent-loss and range-coverage readings are unavailable, while low activity at 0.02x may limit fee compensation for price divergence.
For SOL-WOULD, consider exiting when TVL is draining, volume weakens from its current level, or WOULD becomes difficult to sell outside the pool. An LP should also reassess before a known emission reduction or a sustained one-sided price move.
For SOL-WOULD, consider exiting when TVL is draining, volume weakens from its current level, or WOULD becomes difficult to sell outside the pool. An LP should also reassess before a known emission reduction or a sustained one-sided price move.
No credible break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss data is unavailable and fee income varies with trading activity. The nominal annual return is 2.1%, but that figure should not be treated as a guaranteed recovery period for price divergence.
No credible break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss data is unavailable and fee income varies with trading activity. The nominal annual return is 2.1%, but that figure should not be treated as a guaranteed recovery period for price divergence.
