CARDS-USDCon Raydium CLMMCLMMHigh Yield
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $2.75M
- APR
- 500.0% APR
- 24h Volume
- $3.71M 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.40% fee
- Pool address
- HnhpJPJg…23tD · observed 2026-09-07
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 65/100 with Enter 64/100 / Hold 66/100 / Exit 16/100 produces a live HOLD verdict, driven by ai_engine=hold. Its #58 rank among 4410 raydium-clmm pools indicates a relatively strong position within that set, but not a low-risk position: the score reflects fee generation and current pool conditions rather than protection from memecoin price risk. A material TVL drain, collapse in fee yield, or loss of trading activity would weaken the assessment; persistent volume with stable liquidity would support it.
Computed 2026-09-07 17:02 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$2.75M
Total value locked
$3.71M
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up500.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 158.4%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a deliberately monitored range around the current CARDS-USDC price, rebalance when price exits that range, and reduce or close the position if 200.3% falls alongside a sustained decline in trading volume or pool liquidity.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 200.3% | — | — |
| Volume | $3.71M | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $14.84K | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 15 CARDS-USDC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#99 of 14926 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 1% of all Solana pools
overall rank #829 of 107256
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the CARDS-USDC liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing CARDS and USDC into a price range so traders can swap between them, with trading fees distributed to liquidity providers. The position can end up holding more CARDS after a price fall or more USDC after a price rise, so fees do not remove the risk of losses from CARDS price movements.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated yield decomposes into 200.3% fee-only APR and 299.7% reward-only APR. 40% of yield comes from trading fees, making emission decay less relevant to the current APR than changes in volume, liquidity, and fee capture. Reward-dependency status is not established, and no reliable reward-duration estimate is supplied.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and the share of liquidity currently inside the active tick range are not available, so recent IL and range efficiency cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN-family pool, CARDS-USDC carries pronounced price-dislocation and liquidity-contraction risk; emission decay can reduce any future incentive component, and exit timing should be tied to falling fee volume or a sustained CARDS repricing rather than to a fixed farming schedule.
tollCARDS Context
CARDS is the volatile asset in this pair, while USDC supplies the quote side for CARDS pricing and swaps. Cross-venue CARDS liquidity depth is not established by the supplied metrics; a sharp CARDS move can leave the LP holding more of the depreciating asset, while concentrated liquidity can amplify inventory changes as price crosses the selected range.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is the stable quote asset and normally provides the less volatile side of the position, although stablecoin and venue-specific risks remain. USDC's broader Solana liquidity can support routing, but this pool's LP outcome still depends on CARDS demand and on whether the position remains active around the prevailing CARDS-USDC price.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing CARDS and USDC into a price range so traders can swap between them, with trading fees distributed to liquidity providers. The position can end up holding more CARDS after a price fall or more USDC after a price rise, so fees do not remove the risk of losses from CARDS price movements.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- HnhpJPJgBG2KwniMTNW8cVBHvk1hFog3RC3kjnyc23tD
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- CARDS (CARDSccU…)
- Token B
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Created
- 4/20/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
0%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The pool currently shows 299.7% reward-only APR and 200.3% fee-only APR, with 40% of yield from fees. Emission decay would therefore matter mainly if rewards are introduced or become a larger component; the present stated APR is primarily tied to trading activity.
The pool currently shows 299.7% reward-only APR and 200.3% fee-only APR, with 40% of yield from fees. Emission decay would therefore matter mainly if rewards are introduced or become a larger component; the present stated APR is primarily tied to trading activity.
If incentives expire, the reward component would fall toward zero, but the fee component would remain dependent on CARDS-USDC trading volume. Since the pool currently shows 299.7% reward-only APR and 200.3% fee-only APR, the immediate effect depends on whether any unreported or future incentive program is active.
If incentives expire, the reward component would fall toward zero, but the fee component would remain dependent on CARDS-USDC trading volume. Since the pool currently shows 299.7% reward-only APR and 200.3% fee-only APR, the immediate effect depends on whether any unreported or future incentive program is active.
Risk is high relative to a stablecoin pair because CARDS can reprice sharply, causing inventory imbalance and impermanent loss while liquidity may contract. Recent IL and active-range coverage are not available, so the magnitude of recent loss and range utilization cannot be assessed from the supplied data.
Risk is high relative to a stablecoin pair because CARDS can reprice sharply, causing inventory imbalance and impermanent loss while liquidity may contract. Recent IL and active-range coverage are not available, so the magnitude of recent loss and range utilization cannot be assessed from the supplied data.
For CARDS-USDC, consider exiting when CARDS demand and trading volume weaken, when pool liquidity drains, or when 200.3% no longer compensates for the position's price exposure. Also exit or rebalance when price remains outside the selected concentrated-liquidity range.
For CARDS-USDC, consider exiting when CARDS demand and trading volume weaken, when pool liquidity drains, or when 200.3% no longer compensates for the position's price exposure. Also exit or rebalance when price remains outside the selected concentrated-liquidity range.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent IL, tick-range coverage, and the path of CARDS price are unavailable. Fees accrue at 200.3%, but recovery depends on sustained volume and whether CARDS later retraces toward the entry price.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent IL, tick-range coverage, and the path of CARDS price are unavailable. Fees accrue at 200.3%, but recovery depends on sustained volume and whether CARDS later retraces toward the entry price.
