SOL-NOSon Raydium CLMMCLMMActive
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $176.37K
- APR
- 46.8% APR
- 24h Volume
- $54.29K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.40% fee
- Pool address
- JS4VAUXF…vZsQ · observed 2026-09-04
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 50/100 places SOL-NOS in a mixed position: Enter is 44/100, Hold is 57/100, and Exit is 24/100, with the live verdict HOLD. The explicit verdict driver is ai_engine=hold, and the pool ranks #134 of 4410 raydium-clmm pools, so the assessment is stronger than a bottom-tier result but does not remove concentration, range, or memecoin risks. A material TVL drain, sustained volume decline, collapse in fee APR, or worsening price divergence would change the assessment toward exit; durable fee activity and stable liquidity would support the current hold view.
Computed 2026-09-04 16:20 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$176.37K
Total value locked
$54.29K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up46.8%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 19.3%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a relatively narrow range centered on the current SOL/NOS price, and rebalance when spot reaches either tick boundary rather than waiting for the position to remain inactive. Exit or materially reduce exposure if fee generation weakens while TVL drains, since this pool has no recorded reward APR to offset lower trading income.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 46.8% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 38.4% | — | — |
| Volume | $54.29K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $217.15 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 8 SOL-NOS pools
by AI Farmer Score
#444 of 14424 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 3% of all Solana pools
overall rank #2833 of 105013
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-NOS liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and NOS into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but price changes can leave you with more of the weaker-performing token and may reduce the value of your deposit compared with simply holding both assets.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The reported total APR of 46.8% decomposes into 38.4% from trading fees and 8.4% from rewards. 82% of yield is fee-funded, so the return depends on continued swap activity rather than emissions. Reward dependency is not established, and no reward-expiry horizon is available; any future emission schedule should therefore be treated as uncertain and subject to decay.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history is not available, and the share of time spent in range over that period is also unreported, so recent loss and range-efficiency conclusions cannot be quantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-NOS is exposed to abrupt NOS repricing, thin exit liquidity, and adverse selection when price moves outside the chosen ticks. Emission decay is a secondary risk because current yield is fee-funded, but exit timing becomes more important if trading activity or market attention declines.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the network's primary asset and generally has deeper liquidity across Solana venues than a single SOL-NOS pool; exact comparative depth is not supplied here. A sharp SOL move against NOS changes the inventory mix and can push a concentrated-liquidity position out of range, while SOL volatility can increase fees and impermanent-loss exposure at the same time.
tollNOS Context
NOS is the memecoin-side asset in this pair, and its liquidity depth outside this pool is not established by the supplied metrics. A rapid NOS repricing against SOL can generate fee volume but also leave the LP holding more of the depreciating asset or remove the position from its active range.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and NOS into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but price changes can leave you with more of the weaker-performing token and may reduce the value of your deposit compared with simply holding both assets.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- JS4VAUXFkMvtbxWxUVNG48SRK6QCkqThzED83QXvZsQ
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- NOS (nosXBVoa…)
- Created
- 4/20/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
0%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current return is reported as 46.8%, consisting of 38.4% in fees and 8.4% in rewards. Since the reported yield is fee-funded, emission decay is not the current APR driver, but any future rewards should not be treated as permanent.
The current return is reported as 46.8%, consisting of 38.4% in fees and 8.4% in rewards. Since the reported yield is fee-funded, emission decay is not the current APR driver, but any future rewards should not be treated as permanent.
There is no recorded reward APR to remove from the current yield, so the fee component of 38.4% would remain the relevant source of return. If trading volume falls after incentives or attention decline, the total APR of 46.8% would not be expected to persist.
There is no recorded reward APR to remove from the current yield, so the fee component of 38.4% would remain the relevant source of return. If trading volume falls after incentives or attention decline, the total APR of 46.8% would not be expected to persist.
The risk is driven by NOS price volatility, possible range exit, and limited pool depth relative to an abrupt move. With TVL of $176K and 24h volume of $54K, fee income exists, but it does not eliminate impermanent loss or the risk of holding more NOS after a selloff.
The risk is driven by NOS price volatility, possible range exit, and limited pool depth relative to an abrupt move. With TVL of $176K and 24h volume of $54K, fee income exists, but it does not eliminate impermanent loss or the risk of holding more NOS after a selloff.
For SOL-NOS, consider exiting when the position remains outside its active range, when fee income falls materially, or when TVL drains while NOS volatility rises. A weakening 0.31x or a collapse in 38.4% would be a clearer exit signal than the headline APR alone.
For SOL-NOS, consider exiting when the position remains outside its active range, when fee income falls materially, or when TVL drains while NOS volatility rises. A weakening 0.31x or a collapse in 38.4% would be a clearer exit signal than the headline APR alone.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range occupancy are not reported. Fees of 38.4% could offset a loss over time only if volume and the fee rate remain stable, which is uncertain for a MEMECOIN pool.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range occupancy are not reported. Fees of 38.4% could offset a loss over time only if volume and the fee rate remain stable, which is uncertain for a MEMECOIN pool.
