new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 87/100 places this pool between the Enter score of 87/100 and the Hold score of 87/100, with an Exit score of 13/100; the live verdict is ENTER. The ai_engine=hold driver indicates that current fee production and pool conditions support retaining exposure, but not an unqualified entry signal. Its rank of #85-of-8541 raydium-amm pools is a relative position, not a guarantee of future returns. A sustained TVL drain, volume contraction, fee-yield collapse, or a material increase in USELESS volatility would weaken the assessment; persistent fee generation with stable liquidity would support it.
Computed 2026-09-07 18:40 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$4.63M
Total value locked
$9.82M
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up500.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 166.9%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Deploy Capital
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter with a range that can be monitored at least daily, and exit or rebalance when the pool's fee generation no longer compensates for USELESS price divergence or when volume falls materially below the current 2.12x baseline.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 197.9% | — | — |
| Volume | $9.82M | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $24.56K | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 14 SOL-USELESS pools
by AI Farmer Score
#464 of 61707 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 1% of all Solana pools
overall rank #616 of 107256
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-USELESS liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and USELESS into a shared pool so other users can trade between them. You receive trading fees, but you can end up with more of the token that performed worse, and the memecoin can lose value quickly.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into a fee-only APR of 197.9% and a reward-only APR of 302.1%. 40% of the stated yield comes from trading fees, so there is no current reward component to cushion a decline in volume. Reward duration is not established, and the pool's lifecycle is unknown; any future emission program would make the APR more dependent on incentive design and decay.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and seven-day tick occupancy are not reported, so realized range behavior cannot be inferred from the available record. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-USELESS is exposed to sharp relative price moves, thin or retreating liquidity, and rapid changes in trading demand; SOL and USELESS moving apart can create impermanent loss even while fees accrue. Emission decay is not currently the main risk because reward APR is absent, but exit timing matters if volume, liquidity, or market attention deteriorates before a position is closed.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established, more broadly traded asset in this pair and generally has deeper liquidity across Solana venues than USELESS. For this LP, SOL price action matters both directly and relative to USELESS: a large SOL move can shift the pool price and cause rebalancing into the weaker-performing asset.
tollUSELESS Context
USELESS is the memecoin-side asset, so its liquidity depth and price discovery are more dependent on this market and a smaller set of venues than SOL. A sharp USELESS rally or decline against SOL increases inventory divergence and can make the LP hold more of the underperforming token after arbitrage.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and USELESS into a shared pool so other users can trade between them. You receive trading fees, but you can end up with more of the token that performed worse, and the memecoin can lose value quickly.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- Q2sPHPdUWFMg7M7wwrQKLrn619cAucfRsmhVJffodSp
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- USELESS (Dz9mQ9Nz…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
369%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
18%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Current reward-only APR is 302.1%, so the stated 500.0% APR is not presently supported by emissions. If incentives are added later, emission decay could reduce the reward component while fee income remains tied to trading volume.
Current reward-only APR is 302.1%, so the stated 500.0% APR is not presently supported by emissions. If incentives are added later, emission decay could reduce the reward component while fee income remains tied to trading volume.
There is currently no reward contribution represented: 302.1% is the reward-only APR and 40% of yield comes from fees. If incentives are introduced and later expire, the pool would rely on its fee-only APR of 197.9%, making a decline in volume more consequential.
There is currently no reward contribution represented: 302.1% is the reward-only APR and 40% of yield comes from fees. If incentives are introduced and later expire, the pool would rely on its fee-only APR of 197.9%, making a decline in volume more consequential.
The main risks are USELESS price collapse, sharp SOL-USELESS divergence, and liquidity leaving the pool. With $4.6M TVL and $9.8M in 24-hour volume, fees may offset some losses, but they do not remove impermanent loss or token-price risk.
The main risks are USELESS price collapse, sharp SOL-USELESS divergence, and liquidity leaving the pool. With $4.6M TVL and $9.8M in 24-hour volume, fees may offset some losses, but they do not remove impermanent loss or token-price risk.
For SOL-USELESS, an exit is more defensible when volume or liquidity deteriorates, fee income falls below the risk of holding USELESS, or the market moves persistently outside the range you can manage. A material decline from the current 2.12x volume-to-liquidity ratio is a practical warning signal.
For SOL-USELESS, an exit is more defensible when volume or liquidity deteriorates, fee income falls below the risk of holding USELESS, or the market moves persistently outside the range you can manage. A material decline from the current 2.12x volume-to-liquidity ratio is a practical warning signal.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported and fee income changes with volume. The relevant offset is the fee-only APR of 197.9%, but actual recovery depends on future trading activity, SOL-USELESS price divergence, and how long the position remains active.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported and fee income changes with volume. The relevant offset is the fee-only APR of 197.9%, but actual recovery depends on future trading activity, SOL-USELESS price divergence, and how long the position remains active.
