SOL-SOSon Raydium CLMMCLMM
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $170.50K
- APR
- 1.0% APR
- 24h Volume
- $1.88K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.25% fee
- Pool address
- UqYKdsVC…PyHu · observed 2026-11-03
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, and Exit at 80/100; the live verdict is EXIT and the stated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold. Its rank of #1547 of 9963 raydium-clmm pools places it above many listed pools but does not establish that its fee yield compensates for SOL-SOS concentration and memecoin exit risk. The hold assessment would weaken if TVL drained, volume fell enough to reduce fee APR, or the fee stream became less reliable; it would improve if sustained volume increased fees without requiring emissions and if liquidity remained stable through price volatility.
Computed 2026-11-03 02:29 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$170.50K
Total value locked
$1.88K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up1.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -98.7%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter with a range narrow enough to earn fees only if you can monitor it, and set a rebalance or exit alert when the pool price reaches the outer fifth of your selected range. Exit rather than repeatedly widening the range if fee generation weakens alongside falling volume, because widening increases passive exposure to the memecoin side without a stronger fee base.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 1.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 1.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $1.88K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $4.69 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 3 SOL-SOS pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1579 of 19999 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 13% of all Solana pools
overall rank #19038 of 153992
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-SOS liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and SOS into a shared trading pool and receiving a portion of swap fees. Your holdings can change toward whichever token performs worse, and the position may stop earning fees if its price moves outside the range you selected.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield decomposes into 1.0% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 100% of the reported yield comes from fees, while reward dependency is not established as a separate source of current return. With no reward component currently contributing, emission decay is not the immediate APR driver; future returns instead depend on whether volume supports fee generation.
shieldRisk Assessment
A recent impermanent-loss reading and tick-in-range history are unavailable, so the realized cost of holding inventory through SOL-SOS price divergence cannot be quantified from the supplied data. The range remains exposed to one-sided price movement: if SOL or SOS moves sharply relative to the other, a concentrated LP can leave its intended range and stop earning fees until rebalanced. As a MEMECOIN pool, emission decay and exit timing matter because speculative liquidity can leave quickly when attention or incentives weaken, even when current yield is fee-funded.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the network's primary asset and generally has deeper liquidity across Solana venues than SOS, which can make SOL the more liquid side of this pair. For this LP, SOL appreciating relative to SOS tends to leave the position with more SOS inventory, while SOL underperforming tends to leave more SOL inventory; the resulting inventory mix can diverge materially from simply holding both assets.
tollSOS Context
SOS is the memecoin side of the pair, so its liquidity and price discovery are likely more dependent on this pool and other smaller venues than SOL's. A sharp SOS move can push a concentrated position out of range or convert much of the LP into the weaker asset, while a liquidity withdrawal elsewhere can increase execution impact and make exit timing more important.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and SOS into a shared trading pool and receiving a portion of swap fees. Your holdings can change toward whichever token performs worse, and the position may stop earning fees if its price moves outside the range you selected.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- UqYKdsVCTjv7gRtkhtYAu7RYQXVxFKadFrhoQ5iPyHu
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- SOS (HDa3zJc1…)
- Created
- 4/20/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 0.0%, so emission decay is not presently the main source of APR. The reported total remains 1.0%, with 1.0% coming from trading fees and 100% of yield fee-funded.
The current reward component is 0.0%, so emission decay is not presently the main source of APR. The reported total remains 1.0%, with 1.0% coming from trading fees and 100% of yield fee-funded.
Because the current reward component is 0.0%, expiration would not remove a meaningful current reward stream. The remaining return would be the fee component, 1.0%, which depends on trading volume and the pool's liquidity.
Because the current reward component is 0.0%, expiration would not remove a meaningful current reward stream. The remaining return would be the fee component, 1.0%, which depends on trading volume and the pool's liquidity.
Risk is elevated by the memecoin structure, relative liquidity uncertainty, and possible rapid price divergence between SOL and SOS. The pool's current fee-led APR of 1.0% does not by itself measure inventory loss, range loss, or the difficulty of exiting during a liquidity withdrawal.
Risk is elevated by the memecoin structure, relative liquidity uncertainty, and possible rapid price divergence between SOL and SOS. The pool's current fee-led APR of 1.0% does not by itself measure inventory loss, range loss, or the difficulty of exiting during a liquidity withdrawal.
For SOL-SOS, an exit signal is a combination of weakening volume, declining fee APR, a price move toward or beyond your range boundary, or a visible TVL drain. Exit timing matters because memecoin liquidity can contract before price volatility has subsided.
For SOL-SOS, an exit signal is a combination of weakening volume, declining fee APR, a price move toward or beyond your range boundary, or a visible TVL drain. Exit timing matters because memecoin liquidity can contract before price volatility has subsided.
There is no defensible fixed break-even time because the recent impermanent-loss path and range utilization are unavailable, and future volume is uncertain. Fees accrue at the current rate represented by 1.0%, but they offset impermanent loss only if cumulative fees exceed the position's realized divergence from holding the two tokens.
There is no defensible fixed break-even time because the recent impermanent-loss path and range utilization are unavailable, and future volume is uncertain. Fees accrue at the current rate represented by 1.0%, but they offset impermanent loss only if cumulative fees exceed the position's realized divergence from holding the two tokens.
