new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 47/100 with Enter 41/100, Hold 55/100, and Exit 25/100 supports the live HOLD assessment: the model is not identifying a clear entry edge, but it is also not issuing an exit signal. The ai_engine=hold driver is consistent with a fee-funded pool whose current activity provides some support but whose memecoin and liquidity risks remain material. The pool ranks #530 of 8541 raydium-amm pools, placing it relatively high in that tracked set without making it low risk. A sustained TVL drain, a collapse in fee generation, worsening execution liquidity, or a material increase in LYNK volatility would weaken the hold assessment; stronger volume relative to TVL and durable fee growth would improve it.
Computed 2026-09-21 12:47 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$388.90K
Total value locked
$4.57K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up1.6%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 1.5%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a range that you can monitor frequently, and rebalance or exit when the spot price approaches the outer band or when pool TVL begins a sustained decline without a corresponding increase in trading activity.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 1.6% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 1.6% | — | — |
| Volume | $4.57K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $13.70 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 SOL-LYNK pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1657 of 69219 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 4% of all Solana pools
overall rank #4184 of 118991
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-LYNK liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and LYNK so other users can trade between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your holdings can become more concentrated in whichever token falls in relative value, and the current return comes from fees rather than rewards.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The APR decomposes into 1.6% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 99% of yield comes from trading fees, while reward dependency cannot be established from the available pool data. Because the current reward component is zero, emission decay is not currently reducing the stated APR, but any future incentive program should be treated as temporary until its funding and duration are documented.
shieldRisk Assessment
A usable seven-day impermanent-loss reading is unavailable, and the seven-day tick-in-range history is also unavailable, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-LYNK remains exposed to sharp LYNK repricing, thin exit liquidity, and adverse selection during volatile moves. Emission decay is not the present risk driver because rewards contribute no current APR; exit timing matters more when LYNK liquidity or trading activity weakens.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base asset in this pair and generally has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana than LYNK. SOL price movement changes the pool's inventory mix and can create impermanent loss when SOL and LYNK move differently, even if SOL itself remains liquid elsewhere.
tollLYNK Context
LYNK is the memecoin leg and is likely to have less dispersed liquidity than SOL outside this pool, so its price can move more abruptly during demand changes. A sharp LYNK move, especially against a relatively stable SOL price, can increase inventory imbalance and make withdrawal execution more sensitive to available liquidity.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and LYNK so other users can trade between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your holdings can become more concentrated in whichever token falls in relative value, and the current return comes from fees rather than rewards.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- hzZaxBF4J6sKNhGtDt2TK1sgEDY31YUzfnkthWA5LpB
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- LYNK (HZG1RVn4…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
114%
APR
1%
APR
0%
APR
7%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 0.0%, so emission decay is not contributing to a reduction in the stated APR at present. The displayed total remains 1.6%, consisting of 1.6% in trading fees and no current reward APR.
The current reward component is 0.0%, so emission decay is not contributing to a reduction in the stated APR at present. The displayed total remains 1.6%, consisting of 1.6% in trading fees and no current reward APR.
There is no indicated reward contribution to expire at present, so the current fee-based component is 1.6% and fee sustainability is 99%. If future incentives are added and later expire, the reward portion would disappear while trading-fee income would remain dependent on volume.
There is no indicated reward contribution to expire at present, so the current fee-based component is 1.6% and fee sustainability is 99%. If future incentives are added and later expire, the reward portion would disappear while trading-fee income would remain dependent on volume.
Risk is material because LYNK can move sharply against SOL, and recent seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-range readings are unavailable for measurement. The pool has $389K in liquidity, $5K in 24-hour volume, and a total APR of 1.6%, so fee income should not be treated as protection against a large token-price divergence.
Risk is material because LYNK can move sharply against SOL, and recent seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-range readings are unavailable for measurement. The pool has $389K in liquidity, $5K in 24-hour volume, and a total APR of 1.6%, so fee income should not be treated as protection against a large token-price divergence.
For SOL-LYNK, consider exiting or reducing exposure if TVL declines persistently, volume no longer supports fee generation, LYNK liquidity deteriorates, or the position remains outside its usable price range. The current HOLD assessment should not override those position-level exit signals.
For SOL-LYNK, consider exiting or reducing exposure if TVL declines persistently, volume no longer supports fee generation, LYNK liquidity deteriorates, or the position remains outside its usable price range. The current HOLD assessment should not override those position-level exit signals.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because the recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future SOL-LYNK price divergence is unknown. At the current fee-only rate of 1.6%, fees accrue gradually, but they may not offset a large divergence loss within any predictable period.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because the recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future SOL-LYNK price divergence is unknown. At the current fee-only rate of 1.6%, fees accrue gradually, but they may not offset a large divergence loss within any predictable period.
