new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 assigns Enter 15/100, Hold 20/100, and Exit 80/100, with a live verdict of EXIT. That assessment is consistent with the stated AI-engine hold signal being overridden by high risk at 70/100 and weak yield, placing the pool at rank #602 of 2403 raydium-amm pools rather than among stronger alternatives. The assessment would improve only if sustained volume increased fee generation, liquidity deepened, and risk metrics improved; a TVL drain, further volume decline, or fee-yield collapse would reinforce the exit case.
Computed 2026-07-26 18:30 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$267.88K
Total value locked
$2.66K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up1.3%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -20.1%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a monitored, relatively narrow range only if you can act when the SOL-LYNK price leaves it; otherwise, avoid passive exposure and set an exit alert for sustained weakness in 0.01x or compression in 1.3%.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 1.3% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 1.3% | — | — |
| Volume | $2.66K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $7.98 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 SOL-LYNK pools
by AI Farmer Score
#14992 of 36746 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 27% of all Solana pools
overall rank #18506 of 68818
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-LYNK liquidity pool on raydium-amm. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and LYNK into a shared pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a portion of trading fees, but your holdings can become more concentrated in the asset that performs worse, and low activity limits the fees available.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield decomposes into 1.3% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards, with 99% of yield funded by trading fees. No current reward stream is contributing materially to APR, so emission decay is not the present source of yield deterioration; future incentives, if introduced, would need separate monitoring. Fee income remains dependent on volume, which is currently low relative to TVL.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss and in-range statistics are unavailable, so the historical price-path and range-management risk cannot be quantified from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-LYNK is exposed to sharp price divergence, thin liquidity, and rapid changes in trader interest. Emission decay can reduce incentives in memecoin pools, while exit timing matters because liquidity and volume can deteriorate before an LP can reposition efficiently.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established asset in this pair and generally has materially deeper liquidity across Solana markets than a single SOL-LYNK pool. SOL price moves relative to LYNK determine the pool's inventory shift and can create impermanent loss for an LP even when the SOL position itself remains liquid elsewhere. The pool's limited trading activity means fee compensation for that relative-price risk is constrained.
tollLYNK Context
LYNK is the memecoin-side asset, so its liquidity depth outside this pair should be verified before treating the position as readily exitable. A sharp LYNK move against SOL can shift the LP toward the weaker-performing asset and increase divergence loss. If LYNK volume or external liquidity contracts, the pool's $268K may not translate into reliable exit depth.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and LYNK into a shared pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a portion of trading fees, but your holdings can become more concentrated in the asset that performs worse, and low activity limits the fees available.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- hzZaxBF4J6sKNhGtDt2TK1sgEDY31YUzfnkthWA5LpB
- Protocol
- raydium-amm
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- LYNK (HZG1RVn4…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
open_in_newView all raydium-amm pools →By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 0.0%, so emission decay is not presently the main APR driver. If incentives are added later and then decline, total APR would fall unless trading volume raises 1.3%.
The current reward component is 0.0%, so emission decay is not presently the main APR driver. If incentives are added later and then decline, total APR would fall unless trading volume raises 1.3%.
The current reward contribution is 0.0%, while fee income is 1.3% and 99% of yield comes from fees. If future incentives expire, the pool would rely on trading fees, which are limited by the current 0.01x.
The current reward contribution is 0.0%, while fee income is 1.3% and 99% of yield comes from fees. If future incentives expire, the pool would rely on trading fees, which are limited by the current 0.01x.
SOL-LYNK carries memecoin-specific risks including sharp LYNK price moves, thin or declining exit liquidity, and uncertain range performance. Its risk score is 70/100, and its $268K of liquidity currently supports only a 0.01x volume-to-TVL ratio.
SOL-LYNK carries memecoin-specific risks including sharp LYNK price moves, thin or declining exit liquidity, and uncertain range performance. Its risk score is 70/100, and its $268K of liquidity currently supports only a 0.01x volume-to-TVL ratio.
For SOL-LYNK, consider exiting when volume remains weak, 1.3% declines, TVL drains, or the SOL-LYNK price leaves your managed range without a credible recovery in liquidity. The current live verdict is EXIT, so waiting for a reward stream is not an exit rationale.
For SOL-LYNK, consider exiting when volume remains weak, 1.3% declines, TVL drains, or the SOL-LYNK price leaves your managed range without a credible recovery in liquidity. The current live verdict is EXIT, so waiting for a reward stream is not an exit rationale.
There is no defensible break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future fees depend on trading activity. With total APR at 1.3% and volume-to-TVL at 0.01x, fee recovery should not be assumed without a sustained increase in volume and a stable SOL-LYNK price relationship.
There is no defensible break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future fees depend on trading activity. With total APR at 1.3% and volume-to-TVL at 0.01x, fee recovery should not be assumed without a sustained increase in volume and a stable SOL-LYNK price relationship.
