new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 sits below its Enter threshold of 15/100 and Hold threshold of 20/100, while the Exit threshold is 80/100; the live verdict is EXIT. The pool is ranked #2192 of 18146 raydium-amm pools, and the scanner is CRITICAL despite the ai_engine reading hold, leaving the strong EXIT signal unopposed. The assessment would improve only if trading volume and fee generation rose materially, liquidity became more durable, and the scanner no longer identified critical conditions; a TVL drain, further yield collapse, or weaker COM demand would reinforce the exit assessment.
Computed 2026-09-28 11:18 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$26.89K
Total value locked
$149.17
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.4%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -1.2%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a defined exit trigger: remove liquidity if 24-hour volume continues to weaken or pool liquidity begins to drain, rather than holding for emissions that are not currently contributing to APR. If the AMM supports a custom range, use a conservative range and rebalance only when price leaves it materially, since available range-usage data cannot confirm that a narrow range is being utilized.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.4% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.4% | — | — |
| Volume | $149.17 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.37 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SOL-COM pools
by AI Farmer Score
#16599 of 75672 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-COM liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and COM into a shared trading pool and accepting fees in exchange for taking on price and liquidity risk. If SOL and COM move by different amounts, you may withdraw a different mix of tokens and have less value than simply holding them separately.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
SOL-COM decomposes into 0.4% fee APR and 0.0% reward APR, with 100% of yield sourced from trading fees. Rewards are not currently contributing to the stated APR, and the reward schedule is not established, so emission duration and any future decay cannot be quantified.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-in-range observations are not available, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be assessed from those metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-COM carries token-specific volatility, liquidity, and demand risk; emissions can decay quickly if incentives are introduced, so exit timing should be based on falling volume, shrinking liquidity, or deteriorating token demand rather than waiting for a fixed reward horizon.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established Solana asset in this pair and generally has deeper liquidity across other venues than COM. SOL price moves change the relative price of the pair, which can create impermanent loss for an LP when SOL trends sharply against COM and can alter the inventory mix held by the position.
tollCOM Context
COM is the memecoin side of the pair, with liquidity and price formation more dependent on concentrated trading activity than SOL. A sharp COM move, loss of buyer demand, or thinner liquidity elsewhere can increase inventory imbalance, widen execution costs, and make exiting the LP position more difficult.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and COM into a shared trading pool and accepting fees in exchange for taking on price and liquidity risk. If SOL and COM move by different amounts, you may withdraw a different mix of tokens and have less value than simply holding them separately.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- wMaijhY8CvYSYH2mpMabmXujs9Suga8Tb1DAEdrCfh8
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- COM (8K5CdkJT…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
42%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
7%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The stated APR is currently split between 0.4% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, so reward-emission decay is not presently reducing the reported reward component. If incentives are added later, the reward portion could decline as emissions taper, while fee APR would still depend on trading volume.
The stated APR is currently split between 0.4% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, so reward-emission decay is not presently reducing the reported reward component. If incentives are added later, the reward portion could decline as emissions taper, while fee APR would still depend on trading volume.
Because 0.0% is currently the reward component, expiry of any future incentives would remove that portion and leave fee income represented by 0.4%. With 100% of yield already coming from fees, the position would then depend entirely on trading activity, which is currently limited.
Because 0.0% is currently the reward component, expiry of any future incentives would remove that portion and leave fee income represented by 0.4%. With 100% of yield already coming from fees, the position would then depend entirely on trading activity, which is currently limited.
The risk is substantial because COM can experience abrupt price changes, reduced buyer demand, and thin exit liquidity relative to SOL. The pool's Wealthville Score is 17/100 with a live verdict of EXIT, and unavailable recent range and impermanent-loss data add uncertainty.
The risk is substantial because COM can experience abrupt price changes, reduced buyer demand, and thin exit liquidity relative to SOL. The pool's Wealthville Score is 17/100 with a live verdict of EXIT, and unavailable recent range and impermanent-loss data add uncertainty.
For SOL-COM, use weakening volume, falling TVL, a widening price divergence between SOL and COM, or a critical risk signal as exit conditions rather than waiting for emissions. The current live verdict is EXIT, so an LP should require measurable improvement in liquidity and fee generation before treating continued exposure as justified.
For SOL-COM, use weakening volume, falling TVL, a widening price divergence between SOL and COM, or a critical risk signal as exit conditions rather than waiting for emissions. The current live verdict is EXIT, so an LP should require measurable improvement in liquidity and fee generation before treating continued exposure as justified.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss data is unavailable and future fee generation is uncertain. In a simplified model, break-even time equals the loss incurred divided by realized fee income, with 0.4% representing the current annualized fee component; actual results will change with SOL-COM price divergence and volume.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss data is unavailable and future fee generation is uncertain. In a simplified model, break-even time equals the loss incurred divided by realized fee income, with 0.4% representing the current annualized fee component; actual results will change with SOL-COM price divergence and volume.
