WLFI-USDCon Raydium CLMMCLMM
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $27.04K
- APR
- 2.8% APR
- 24h Volume
- $1.04K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.20% fee
- Pool address
- zHGN3Kh1…siKJ · observed 2026-10-27
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 places this pool below its Enter threshold of 15/100 and Hold threshold of 20/100, while the Exit score is 80/100 and the live verdict is EXIT. That assessment is consistent with the scanner's CRITICAL status and the unopposed strong EXIT signal, even though the AI engine reads hold. At rank #1884 of 9963 raydium-clmm pools, it is not among the strongest-ranked alternatives. The assessment would improve only with sustained fee volume, deeper and more persistent TVL, a less severe scanner result, or evidence that LPs remain in range; a TVL drain or collapse in fee yield would reinforce the exit case.
Computed 2026-10-27 06:19 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$27.04K
Total value locked
$1.04K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up2.8%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 4.5%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
If entering despite the EXIT signal, use a deliberately narrow active range and set an exit or rebalance rule for a material TVL drain, a sustained loss of fee volume, or a scanner status that remains CRITICAL; do not leave the position unattended through a sharp WLFI move.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 2.8% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 2.8% | — | — |
| Volume | $1.04K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $2.08 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 13 WLFI-USDC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1197 of 19676 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 8% of all Solana pools
overall rank #10894 of 150817
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the WLFI-USDC liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing WLFI and USDC into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but a large WLFI price move can leave you with a less favorable mix of tokens than simply holding them, and the pool's small size can make exits harder.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated yield decomposes into 2.8% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards, with 99%. Reward dependency is not established, so the current APR should be evaluated primarily as compensation for facilitating swaps rather than as an emissions-supported return. If incentives are introduced or removed, the reward component would need to be reassessed separately.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history is not available, and the pool does not provide a recent tick-in-range reading, so realized price-path and range-management risk cannot be quantified from this sheet. As a MEMECOIN pool, WLFI-USDC is exposed to sharp WLFI repricing, thin liquidity, and adverse selection during one-sided flows. Emission decay is not currently the main risk because the reported reward component is zero, but any future incentives could create short-lived liquidity followed by an exit when emissions weaken.
tollWLFI Context
WLFI is the volatile asset in this pair, while USDC supplies the stable quoting side. The pool's $27K depth is small relative to established Solana venues, and the available data does not establish substantial WLFI liquidity elsewhere; abrupt WLFI price moves can therefore increase execution impact and impermanent loss for LPs. A WLFI rally or selloff changes the asset mix held by the position and can leave the LP underexposed to the outperforming side.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is the stable asset used to quote WLFI and provides the pool's accounting reference for dollar value. USDC has broader utility and liquidity across Solana, but that does not remove the pool-specific risk created by shallow WLFI-USDC depth. When WLFI falls, the position tends to accumulate WLFI; when WLFI rises, it tends to sell WLFI into the move.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing WLFI and USDC into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but a large WLFI price move can leave you with a less favorable mix of tokens than simply holding them, and the pool's small size can make exits harder.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- zHGN3Kh1miQSuehUWD1TPYTxkCkUrtT8foNxtASsiKJ
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- WLFI (WLFinEv6…)
- Token B
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Created
- 4/20/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 0.0%, so the reported 2.8% APR is currently fee-funded rather than dependent on emissions. If future rewards are added and then decay, total APR would fall unless trading fees increase enough to offset them.
The current reward component is 0.0%, so the reported 2.8% APR is currently fee-funded rather than dependent on emissions. If future rewards are added and then decay, total APR would fall unless trading fees increase enough to offset them.
The present reward component is 0.0%, so removing incentives would not reduce the stated APR through a currently reported reward stream. If incentives are later introduced, their expiry could reduce liquidity and leave fee income as the remaining source of yield, currently represented by 2.8%.
The present reward component is 0.0%, so removing incentives would not reduce the stated APR through a currently reported reward stream. If incentives are later introduced, their expiry could reduce liquidity and leave fee income as the remaining source of yield, currently represented by 2.8%.
Risk is elevated because WLFI can reprice sharply, the pool has $27K TVL, and its 0.04x turnover indicates limited recent trading relative to liquidity. Impermanent-loss history and time-in-range data are not available here, so the realized cost of WLFI volatility cannot be estimated from those measures.
Risk is elevated because WLFI can reprice sharply, the pool has $27K TVL, and its 0.04x turnover indicates limited recent trading relative to liquidity. Impermanent-loss history and time-in-range data are not available here, so the realized cost of WLFI volatility cannot be estimated from those measures.
For this pool, an exit is reasonable when the CRITICAL scanner status persists, TVL drains, fee volume weakens, or WLFI moves outside the range you can actively manage. Those conditions align with the current EXIT verdict and should take priority over the stated 2.8% APR.
For this pool, an exit is reasonable when the CRITICAL scanner status persists, TVL drains, fee volume weakens, or WLFI moves outside the range you can actively manage. Those conditions align with the current EXIT verdict and should take priority over the stated 2.8% APR.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss and range-history readings are unavailable. The theoretical fee accrual is 2.8%, but actual recovery depends on WLFI price path, time in range, volume persistence, and whether the position must be rebalanced.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss and range-history readings are unavailable. The theoretical fee accrual is 2.8%, but actual recovery depends on WLFI price path, time in range, volume persistence, and whether the position must be rebalanced.
