new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 50/100, with Enter at 45/100, Hold at 56/100, Exit at 25/100, and a live verdict of HOLD. The ai_engine=hold driver implies the current data supports maintaining existing exposure more than opening a new position or exiting immediately. Its rank of #347 of 1696 meteora-dlmm pools places it above many listed pools, but not near the top of the set; that ranking does not remove memecoin and concentration risk. A material TVL drain, collapse in fee APR, weakening volume-to-TVL activity, or a clear deterioration in MET liquidity would change the assessment toward exit, while durable fee volume with stable liquidity could support continued holding.
Computed 2026-08-23 11:02 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$109.81K
Total value locked
$16.65K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up82.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 33.1%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter with a range centered on the current MET/USDC price, monitor whether price reaches either boundary, and rebalance or exit when a boundary is reached rather than leaving liquidity inactive; exit sooner if pool TVL drains or fee generation falls sharply.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 82.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 60.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $16.65K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $151.44 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#8 of 32 MET-USDC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#432 of 2800 on meteora-dlmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1874 of 95923
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the MET-USDC liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing MET and USDC into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. The amount of each token in your position changes as MET's price moves, so you can end up with a different mix, and possibly less value than simply holding both tokens.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated APR decomposes into 60.0% from trading fees and 22.1% from rewards. 73% means the current yield is attributed to swap activity rather than emissions. Reward dependency and the reward schedule are not established, so the fee APR should be treated as dependent on future volume, fee rates, and the amount of liquidity competing for those fees.
shieldRisk Assessment
A recent impermanent-loss reading and tick-in-range history are not provided, so the position's realized range efficiency cannot be quantified from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, MET-USDC carries sharp price-move, liquidity-withdrawal, and exit-slippage risk; emission decay can reduce any incentive component, while exiting after a large MET move can crystallize both inventory divergence and execution losses. An LP should also account for the possibility that concentrated liquidity becomes inactive when MET moves outside the selected range.
tollMET Context
MET is the volatile side of this pair, so its price changes determine how the LP's inventory shifts between MET and USDC as trades occur. No cross-venue liquidity-depth figure is supplied for MET; thin external liquidity or abrupt price action would increase slippage and make rebalancing or exit timing more consequential. A sustained MET decline can leave the LP with more MET, while a sharp rise can leave it with more USDC than a passive holder would have held.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is the quote and relatively stable reference asset in this pool, allowing MET's price to be measured directly against dollars. Its main additional risk is stablecoin depeg or venue-specific settlement risk, rather than memecoin price volatility. When MET moves strongly, the LP's USDC balance can rise while its MET exposure falls, or the reverse, depending on trade direction and range placement.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing MET and USDC into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. The amount of each token in your position changes as MET's price moves, so you can end up with a different mix, and possibly less value than simply holding both tokens.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 2FAaQdbzVN5NJWhqSQsBZhJFivYDMycRTDJBzxmKKAig
- Protocol
- Meteora DLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- MET (METvsvVR…)
- Token B
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
500%
APR
2%
APR
0%
APR
133%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-dlmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current breakdown is 60.0% fee APR and 22.1% reward APR, with 73% attributed to fees. If emissions decay, the reward component would fall, but the stated APR is already primarily or entirely dependent on trading fees rather than rewards.
The current breakdown is 60.0% fee APR and 22.1% reward APR, with 73% attributed to fees. If emissions decay, the reward component would fall, but the stated APR is already primarily or entirely dependent on trading fees rather than rewards.
The current reward component is 22.1%, so expiration would have limited direct effect if that component remains at its current level. The remaining fee APR, 60.0%, would still depend on MET-USDC trading volume, fee rates, and competing liquidity.
The current reward component is 22.1%, so expiration would have limited direct effect if that component remains at its current level. The remaining fee APR, 60.0%, would still depend on MET-USDC trading volume, fee rates, and competing liquidity.
Risk is high relative to a stablecoin or blue-chip pair because MET can move abruptly, concentrate liquidity can fall out of range, and exit liquidity can deteriorate. The pool's $110K TVL and 0.15x volume-to-TVL ratio provide context, but they do not cap MET price risk or impermanent loss.
Risk is high relative to a stablecoin or blue-chip pair because MET can move abruptly, concentrate liquidity can fall out of range, and exit liquidity can deteriorate. The pool's $110K TVL and 0.15x volume-to-TVL ratio provide context, but they do not cap MET price risk or impermanent loss.
For MET-USDC, consider exiting when price reaches the edge of your range, when TVL or fee generation deteriorates, or when MET liquidity becomes insufficient for a controlled withdrawal. Do not treat 82.1% as a reason to remain invested if the underlying volume or exit conditions have materially worsened.
For MET-USDC, consider exiting when price reaches the edge of your range, when TVL or fee generation deteriorates, or when MET liquidity becomes insufficient for a controlled withdrawal. Do not treat 82.1% as a reason to remain invested if the underlying volume or exit conditions have materially worsened.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss and range-history data are not available. 82.1% is an annualized rate based on observed conditions, not a guaranteed recovery schedule; actual break-even depends on MET's path, time in range, fees earned, and withdrawal execution.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss and range-history data are not available. 82.1% is an annualized rate based on observed conditions, not a guaranteed recovery schedule; actual break-even depends on MET's path, time in range, fees earned, and withdrawal execution.
