new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 52/100, with Enter at 47/100, Hold at 59/100, and Exit at 22/100. The live verdict is HOLD, driven by ai_engine=hold, and the pool ranks #298 of 3343 meteora-dlmm pools. That places the pool in a hold posture rather than a clear entry signal: fee income is currently the entire stated yield source, but the low liquidity base and memecoin-specific price risk limit confidence in persistence. A material TVL drain, collapsing volume, reduced fee APR, or sustained META price dislocation would weaken the assessment; durable fee generation with improving liquidity would strengthen it.
Computed 2026-10-26 22:37 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$60.41K
Total value locked
$18.21K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up174.6%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 100.2%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a range you can monitor and rebalance when META/SOL leaves the selected active bins; exit if sustained volume and fee generation fall enough that continued META inventory exposure is no longer justified.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 174.6% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 101.2% | — | — |
| Volume | $18.21K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $169.36 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 3 META-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#533 of 4449 on meteora-dlmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #2624 of 150817
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the META-SOL liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing META and SOL into a shared trading pool and receiving part of the trading fees. You may end up holding more of whichever token performs worse, and the position can lose value relative to simply holding both tokens if META moves sharply.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The pool reports 174.6% total APR, decomposed into 101.2% fee-only APR and 73.5% reward-only APR. 58% of yield is attributed to trading fees, so the current return does not rely on a visible reward stream. A time-bound reward schedule is not available, which limits analysis of future emission decay.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-in-range readings are unavailable, so recent inventory divergence and range efficiency cannot be quantified from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, META-SOL is exposed to abrupt META demand changes, shallow-liquidity price gaps, and rapid fee compression when trading interest fades. Exit timing should therefore be based on declining volume, a falling fee rate, or META moving persistently outside the active bins rather than on the headline APR alone.
tollMETA Context
META is the memecoin side of this pair, so its price movement relative to SOL determines whether the LP accumulates more META or more SOL as the market moves. Liquidity depth for META outside this pool is not provided; abrupt META price action can create inventory imbalance and make execution or rebalancing more costly.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the reference asset and the deeper, more established side of the pair, but its liquidity depth relative to this specific pool is not provided. If SOL rallies or sells off against META, the LP position is reweighted toward the weaker-performing asset, while SOL volatility can also move META-SOL outside its active bins.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing META and SOL into a shared trading pool and receiving part of the trading fees. You may end up holding more of whichever token performs worse, and the position can lose value relative to simply holding both tokens if META moves sharply.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 2e3dimMUyj67E8GELwcD96HiJeXa4diKVkmn8A5wf4rt
- Protocol
- Meteora DLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- META (METAwkXc…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
6%
APR
4%
APR
5%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-dlmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only APR is 73.5%, while fee-only APR is 101.2% and total APR is 174.6%. Because the stated yield is entirely fee-funded, emission decay is not currently the main APR driver; future incentives, if added, would require separate monitoring.
The current reward-only APR is 73.5%, while fee-only APR is 101.2% and total APR is 174.6%. Because the stated yield is entirely fee-funded, emission decay is not currently the main APR driver; future incentives, if added, would require separate monitoring.
The current reward component is 73.5%, so there is no stated reward contribution to remove from the present APR. If incentives are introduced and later expire, the remaining return would depend on trading fees, currently represented by 101.2%, rather than emissions.
The current reward component is 73.5%, so there is no stated reward contribution to remove from the present APR. If incentives are introduced and later expire, the remaining return would depend on trading fees, currently represented by 101.2%, rather than emissions.
Risk is high relative to a less volatile pair because META can move sharply, liquidity can thin quickly, and the LP may accumulate META during a decline. The pool's fee-funded APR of 101.2% does not eliminate those inventory and price risks, and recent range and impermanent-loss readings are unavailable.
Risk is high relative to a less volatile pair because META can move sharply, liquidity can thin quickly, and the LP may accumulate META during a decline. The pool's fee-funded APR of 101.2% does not eliminate those inventory and price risks, and recent range and impermanent-loss readings are unavailable.
For META-SOL, consider exiting when volume and fee generation fall materially, META remains outside your active bins, or the position becomes dominated by META during a sustained decline. A headline total APR of 174.6% should not override worsening liquidity or price conditions.
For META-SOL, consider exiting when volume and fee generation fall materially, META remains outside your active bins, or the position becomes dominated by META during a sustained decline. A headline total APR of 174.6% should not override worsening liquidity or price conditions.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss data and range persistence are unavailable. Fees reported at 101.2% may offset divergence over time, but the actual outcome depends on META/SOL price movement, active-bin coverage, and future trading volume.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss data and range persistence are unavailable. Fees reported at 101.2% may offset divergence over time, but the actual outcome depends on META/SOL price movement, active-bin coverage, and future trading volume.
