new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 43/100 places this pool in a middling position, while Enter at 39/100, Hold at 48/100, and Exit at 34/100 support the live HOLD assessment. The ai_engine=hold driver indicates that the current combination of fee-funded yield, trading activity, and pool conditions does not justify an immediate directional action. The pool ranks #253 of 997 meteora-dlmm pools, which is a relative ranking rather than a guarantee of risk-adjusted performance. The assessment would weaken if TVL drained, volume-to-TVL activity deteriorated, fee income collapsed, or JLP/SOL volatility caused persistent out-of-range exposure; it would improve if liquidity and fee volume remained durable without a corresponding increase in price risk.
Computed 2026-08-22 14:50 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$34.91K
Total value locked
$163.40K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up195.7%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 101.9%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter with a range centered on the current JLP/SOL price only if you can monitor it actively, and rebalance or withdraw when the price leaves that range rather than waiting for passive fee income to recover the position. Set a minimum acceptable pool-TVL and volume threshold in advance; exit if either falls below that threshold for your strategy.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 195.7% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 108.6% | — | — |
| Volume | $163.40K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $98.01 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 11 JLP-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#393 of 2800 on meteora-dlmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 3% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1940 of 95923
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the JLP-SOL liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing JLP and SOL into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the pool can leave you holding more of the weaker asset after prices move, and withdrawing may be harder if liquidity falls.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The quoted return decomposes into 108.6% from trading fees and 87.1% from rewards, with 55% of yield fee-funded. Reward dependency is not established in the supplied metrics, and there is no current reward component to underwrite; future APR therefore depends primarily on sustained trading volume and the fees generated by that volume.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history is not available, and the pool has no reported seven-day tick-in-range reading, so recent range efficiency cannot be quantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, JLP-SOL is exposed to sharp relative-price moves, rapid liquidity migration, and adverse inventory accumulation when one asset falls against the other. Emission decay is a family-level risk where incentives exist, but this pool's current return is fee-based; exit timing should account for deteriorating volume, thinner liquidity, and the possibility that rebalancing becomes costly.
tollJLP Context
JLP is the Jupiter Liquidity Provider token and represents exposure to the underlying Jupiter perpetuals liquidity pool, including its asset mix and trader PnL. The supplied metrics do not establish JLP's liquidity depth on other venues, so external execution depth should be checked separately. If JLP weakens against SOL, this LP position can accumulate more JLP as its relative value declines, increasing directional exposure.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base asset paired against JLP in this pool and generally has deeper Solana-wide liquidity than JLP, although venue-specific depth still needs separate verification. If SOL rallies relative to JLP, the position tends to hold more JLP and less SOL after pool rebalancing; if SOL falls, the opposite inventory shift can occur. SOL volatility therefore affects both the pool price and the opportunity cost of remaining in range.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing JLP and SOL into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the pool can leave you holding more of the weaker asset after prices move, and withdrawing may be harder if liquidity falls.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 53RSBX3tsax8KLnEhm8ahScK1khySNPhHFSTPoZpZq2J
- Protocol
- Meteora DLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- JLP (27G8MtK7…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
3%
APR
0%
APR
4%
APR
5%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-dlmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current return is composed of 108.6% in fees and 87.1% in rewards, so emission decay is not currently the main APR driver. If rewards are introduced or later decline, the affected component would fall, while fee income would still depend on $163K volume and pool liquidity of $35K.
The current return is composed of 108.6% in fees and 87.1% in rewards, so emission decay is not currently the main APR driver. If rewards are introduced or later decline, the affected component would fall, while fee income would still depend on $163K volume and pool liquidity of $35K.
The supplied metrics show no current reward component, so an incentive expiry would not remove the present fee-funded component of 195.7%. If future incentives are added, expiry would reduce the reward portion and leave trading fees, represented by 108.6%, as the remaining yield source.
The supplied metrics show no current reward component, so an incentive expiry would not remove the present fee-funded component of 195.7%. If future incentives are added, expiry would reduce the reward portion and leave trading fees, represented by 108.6%, as the remaining yield source.
The MEMECOIN classification implies elevated relative-price and liquidity risk, while recent impermanent-loss and tick-range readings are unavailable. The pool's 4.68x activity ratio and $35K liquidity provide context, but neither prevents losses when JLP and SOL move sharply or liquidity exits.
The MEMECOIN classification implies elevated relative-price and liquidity risk, while recent impermanent-loss and tick-range readings are unavailable. The pool's 4.68x activity ratio and $35K liquidity provide context, but neither prevents losses when JLP and SOL move sharply or liquidity exits.
For JLP-SOL, define exit conditions before entry, such as a sustained decline in pool volume, a material TVL drain, or price movement outside your chosen range. Also exit when the expected fee income, 108.6%, no longer compensates for the pool's relative-price and liquidity risks.
For JLP-SOL, define exit conditions before entry, such as a sustained decline in pool volume, a material TVL drain, or price movement outside your chosen range. Also exit when the expected fee income, 108.6%, no longer compensates for the pool's relative-price and liquidity risks.
A precise break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income changes with volume. At the current quoted structure, recovery depends on sustaining 108.6% in fees while JLP/SOL volatility remains low enough for fees to offset inventory divergence.
A precise break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income changes with volume. At the current quoted structure, recovery depends on sustaining 108.6% in fees while JLP/SOL volatility remains low enough for fees to offset inventory divergence.
