WINGS-USDCon Raydium CLMMCLMM
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $61.05K
- APR
- 2.9% APR
- 24h Volume
- $1.13K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.25% fee
- Pool address
- 5FukodXj…RwCp · observed 2026-08-25
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 43/100 gives this pool a live HOLD verdict, with Enter 37/100, Hold 49/100, and Exit 31/100 scores. The ai_engine=hold driver is consistent with a fee-funded pool that has measurable activity but limited recent turnover and no reward cushion. Its rank of #1000 of 4410 raydium-clmm pools places it above many listed pools but does not establish sufficient depth or persistence for passive sizing. The assessment would worsen with a TVL drain, lower fee generation, reduced WINGS liquidity, or a collapse in trading volume; it would improve if fee production and liquidity increased without a corresponding rise in price volatility.
Computed 2026-08-25 03:47 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$61.05K
Total value locked
$1.13K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up2.9%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -16.9%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a conservative active range around the current WINGS-USDC price and rebalance when the position spends meaningfully outside that range; exit rather than repeatedly widening the range if volume falls materially below its current 0.02x turnover profile or the pool's TVL begins draining.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 2.9% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 2.8% | — | — |
| Volume | $1.13K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $2.83 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 2 WINGS-USDC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#875 of 13158 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 7% of all Solana pools
overall rank #6274 of 98856
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the WINGS-USDC liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing WINGS and USDC into a trading pool so other people can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but large WINGS price moves can leave you holding a different mix of the two assets and worth less than if you had held them separately.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 2.8% fee APR and 0.0% reward APR. 99% of the stated yield comes from trading fees, so the return depends on continued swap activity rather than a current token-emission subsidy. The displayed APR is annualized and can fall if volume or fee generation declines.
shieldRisk Assessment
A recent seven-day impermanent-loss figure is not available, and the seven-day share of time spent in range is also not available, so recent range efficiency cannot be verified. As a MEMECOIN pool, WINGS-USDC has material asymmetric price and liquidity risk: sharp WINGS moves can create impermanent loss, while leaving the active range can stop fee generation. Emission decay is a relevant family-level risk if incentives are introduced later, and exit timing matters because liquidity and demand can deteriorate quickly.
tollWINGS Context
WINGS is the volatile asset in this pair, while USDC is the accounting and settlement side. The supplied pool data do not establish WINGS liquidity depth elsewhere, so a WINGS price move may be harder to exit against than the pool's headline TVL suggests. For this LP, a sustained WINGS move changes the inventory mix and can produce impermanent loss relative to simply holding WINGS and USDC.
tollUSDC Context
USDC provides the relatively stable quote asset against which WINGS is priced. USDC generally has deeper liquidity across Solana venues, but that does not remove the risk that this specific pool becomes thin or that WINGS liquidity disappears. A falling WINGS price tends to leave the LP with more WINGS and less USDC; a rising price tends to do the reverse.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing WINGS and USDC into a trading pool so other people can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but large WINGS price moves can leave you holding a different mix of the two assets and worth less than if you had held them separately.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 5FukodXjJCuQCpam8j49HrqmdfaF7aB2XtdFgJX1RwCp
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- WINGS (WingsAYb…)
- Token B
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
1%
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 0.0%, so emission decay is not currently reducing an active reward stream. If incentives are added later, decay would reduce that component while the 2.8% fee component would continue to depend on trading volume.
The current reward component is 0.0%, so emission decay is not currently reducing an active reward stream. If incentives are added later, decay would reduce that component while the 2.8% fee component would continue to depend on trading volume.
The pool already shows 0.0% reward APR, so expiration would not remove a currently displayed reward contribution. The remaining stated return would be the 2.8% fee APR, which can change with swap activity.
The pool already shows 0.0% reward APR, so expiration would not remove a currently displayed reward contribution. The remaining stated return would be the 2.8% fee APR, which can change with swap activity.
Risk is high relative to a stablecoin pair because WINGS can move sharply, create impermanent loss, and become harder to sell when liquidity contracts. This pool has $61K TVL, $1K in 24h volume, and a 0.02x volume-to-liquidity ratio; no recent impermanent-loss figure is available to validate realized conditions.
Risk is high relative to a stablecoin pair because WINGS can move sharply, create impermanent loss, and become harder to sell when liquidity contracts. This pool has $61K TVL, $1K in 24h volume, and a 0.02x volume-to-liquidity ratio; no recent impermanent-loss figure is available to validate realized conditions.
For this pool, consider exiting when WINGS liquidity or pool TVL is draining, fee generation falls materially below 2.8%, or price leaves your chosen range and re-entry would require accepting substantially more WINGS exposure. Do not treat the HOLD verdict as a substitute for those position-level triggers.
For this pool, consider exiting when WINGS liquidity or pool TVL is draining, fee generation falls materially below 2.8%, or price leaves your chosen range and re-entry would require accepting substantially more WINGS exposure. Do not treat the HOLD verdict as a substitute for those position-level triggers.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and the fee rate depends on future volume. The only current reference is 2.8% fee APR, which is an annualized estimate rather than a guaranteed recovery rate.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and the fee rate depends on future volume. The only current reference is 2.8% fee APR, which is an annualized estimate rather than a guaranteed recovery rate.
