new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The 62/100 Wealthville Score, with Enter at 60/100, Hold at 65/100, Exit at 17/100, produces a live HOLD verdict under the ai_engine=hold driver. Its rank of #57 of 1696 meteora-dlmm pools places it near the upper part of the tracked set, but the score does not remove memecoin, range, or volume-concentration risk. The assessment would weaken if $427K drains, $2.7M declines enough to reduce 76.9%, or the pool's fee generation becomes dependent on incentives; stronger and persistent fee volume with stable liquidity could improve it.
Computed 2026-08-23 06:58 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$426.66K
Total value locked
$2.74M
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up115.6%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 65.5%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter with a range that can tolerate the JLP volatility you are prepared to hold, and set an alert to rebalance or exit if 76.9% falls below your required fee hurdle for two consecutive days or if JLP leaves the active range.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 115.6% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 76.9% | — | — |
| Volume | $2.74M | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $800.62 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#3 of 28 JLP-USDC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#268 of 2800 on meteora-dlmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1190 of 95923
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the JLP-USDC liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing JLP and USDC into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the amounts of JLP and USDC you can withdraw change as JLP's price moves, and a sharp move can leave you with more of the asset that performed worse.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 76.9% from trading fees and 38.7% from rewards, with 67% of yield coming from trading fees. The current profile is therefore primarily fee-driven rather than emission-driven, although reward dependency is not established by the available pool data. Future fee APR depends on volume, liquidity, and the share of swaps routed through this pool.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading and tick-in-range history are unavailable, so recent loss behavior and range utilization cannot be quantified from these metrics. The MEMECOIN classification implies elevated risk of abrupt JLP price moves, adverse selection, and positions becoming inactive outside their chosen range. Emission decay is less central while rewards contribute no stated APR, but exit timing still matters: declining memecoin liquidity or a sharp JLP move can make withdrawal and rebalancing conditions materially worse.
tollJLP Context
JLP is the volatile side of this pool and represents exposure to the underlying memecoin asset rather than a stable settlement asset. The available metrics do not establish JLP's liquidity depth elsewhere; if JLP moves sharply, the LP position accumulates more of the weaker-performing side and may require a range adjustment or exit.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is the stable accounting side of the pair and normally provides the quote asset used to measure JLP's price. Its broader Solana liquidity is generally deeper than this pool's $427K, so USDC price action is less likely to drive the position; JLP's movement is the main source of inventory and impermanent-loss changes.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing JLP and USDC into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the amounts of JLP and USDC you can withdraw change as JLP's price moves, and a sharp move can leave you with more of the asset that performed worse.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 5SHjDACvwtox5nY8kpWNYyaceWjtTG8C6L821D9Gtpjf
- Protocol
- Meteora DLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- JLP (27G8MtK7…)
- Token B
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
500%
APR
2%
APR
0%
APR
133%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-dlmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current APR is split between 76.9% in fees and 38.7% in rewards, with 67% of yield from fees. Because the stated reward component is not contributing to current APR, emission decay has less direct impact than a decline in trading volume, although any future incentives could still decay.
The current APR is split between 76.9% in fees and 38.7% in rewards, with 67% of yield from fees. Because the stated reward component is not contributing to current APR, emission decay has less direct impact than a decline in trading volume, although any future incentives could still decay.
If incentives are present and later expire, the reward component would fall toward zero and total APR would rely on 76.9%. For this pool, the stated yield is already fee-funded, so the key question is whether $2.7M and fee capture remain sufficient after incentives end.
If incentives are present and later expire, the reward component would fall toward zero and total APR would rely on 76.9%. For this pool, the stated yield is already fee-funded, so the key question is whether $2.7M and fee capture remain sufficient after incentives end.
The pool is classified as MEMECOIN, so JLP can experience sharp price moves, thin exit liquidity, and rapid range displacement. The pool's $427K and $2.7M provide useful context for turnover, but they do not eliminate inventory risk or the possibility of large impermanent loss.
The pool is classified as MEMECOIN, so JLP can experience sharp price moves, thin exit liquidity, and rapid range displacement. The pool's $427K and $2.7M provide useful context for turnover, but they do not eliminate inventory risk or the possibility of large impermanent loss.
Consider exiting when JLP liquidity deteriorates, when the position remains outside its active range, or when 76.9% no longer compensates for the risk you are accepting. A sustained decline in $2.7M or $427K is a concrete deterioration signal for this pool.
Consider exiting when JLP liquidity deteriorates, when the position remains outside its active range, or when 76.9% no longer compensates for the risk you are accepting. A sustained decline in $2.7M or $427K is a concrete deterioration signal for this pool.
There is no fixed break-even period because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future JLP price paths are unknown. Break-even requires cumulative fee income from 76.9% to exceed the position's realized price-divergence loss, which depends on volatility, range placement, and how long the position remains active.
There is no fixed break-even period because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future JLP price paths are unknown. Break-even requires cumulative fee income from 76.9% to exceed the position's realized price-divergence loss, which depends on volatility, range placement, and how long the position remains active.
