new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 51/100 assigns this pool a mixed profile: Enter is 48/100, Hold is 55/100, and Exit is 27/100, producing the live verdict HOLD from the ai_engine=hold driver. Its rank of #213 among 997 meteora-dlmm pools places it above many listed pools but does not establish that its risk-adjusted return is superior to alternatives. The assessment would change if TVL drained, volume fell, fee APR collapsed, MET volatility increased, or the pool began relying on short-lived emissions rather than trading fees.
Computed 2026-08-22 12:48 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$415.66K
Total value locked
$613.52K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up236.9%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 105.3%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter with a deliberately monitored range rather than a set-and-forget position, and rebalance or exit when MET trades outside the selected ticks or when pool volume and fee generation weaken enough that the fee stream no longer justifies memecoin inventory risk.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 236.9% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 121.7% | — | — |
| Volume | $613.52K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $1.36K | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#5 of 32 MET-USDC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#427 of 2800 on meteora-dlmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 3% of all Solana pools
overall rank #2122 of 95923
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the MET-USDC liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing MET and USDC into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive trading fees, but a large MET price move can leave you with more of the weaker asset than if you had simply held both tokens, and you must monitor the position because MET is a memecoin.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The pool decomposes into 121.7% fee-only APR and 115.3% reward-only APR, with 51% of yield from trading fees. Reward dependency is not established, and the current reward contribution does not provide a separate emissions-based return. For a MEMECOIN pool, LP economics therefore depend primarily on sustained MET-USDC volume and on whether fee income offsets price divergence and rebalancing costs.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history is not available, and seven-day tick-in-range exposure is also not reported, so recent range efficiency cannot be quantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, MET can experience sharp, discontinuous price moves against USDC, increasing out-of-range risk and inventory imbalance. Emission decay is not currently the main stated risk because rewards contribute no reported APR, but exit timing still matters if trading activity, liquidity, or fee generation deteriorates.
tollMET Context
MET is the volatile side of this pair and the primary source of directional and memecoin risk for an LP. This pool's data does not establish MET's liquidity depth across other venues; thinner external liquidity would make price moves and exits more costly. A sustained MET move against USDC can leave the LP holding mostly the underperforming asset, while a move toward USDC can reduce MET inventory and fee exposure.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is the quote and comparatively stable side of the pair, providing the dollar-denominated reference for MET's price. Its role reduces one side's volatility but does not remove MET-specific liquidity or depegging risks. If MET sells off sharply, the LP may accumulate MET; if MET rallies, the position may convert toward USDC and capture less of the upside.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing MET and USDC into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive trading fees, but a large MET price move can leave you with more of the weaker asset than if you had simply held both tokens, and you must monitor the position because MET is a memecoin.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 5hbf9JP8k5zdrZp9pokPypFQoBse5mGCmW6nqodurGcd
- Protocol
- Meteora DLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- MET (METvsvVR…)
- Token B
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
3%
APR
0%
APR
4%
APR
5%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-dlmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The pool currently reports 115.3% reward-only APR, so the stated 236.9% APR is driven by 121.7% fees rather than emissions. If incentives are introduced or reduced later, emission decay would lower the reward component, but it would not directly reduce fee APR unless trading activity also changed.
The pool currently reports 115.3% reward-only APR, so the stated 236.9% APR is driven by 121.7% fees rather than emissions. If incentives are introduced or reduced later, emission decay would lower the reward component, but it would not directly reduce fee APR unless trading activity also changed.
Because the current reward contribution is 115.3%, expiration of farm incentives would not remove a reported reward stream at present. The position would then rely on trading fees, currently represented by 121.7% and 51%, while MET price risk and exit liquidity would remain.
Because the current reward contribution is 115.3%, expiration of farm incentives would not remove a reported reward stream at present. The position would then rely on trading fees, currently represented by 121.7% and 51%, while MET price risk and exit liquidity would remain.
The risk is driven by MET's volatility, possible thin liquidity outside this pool, and the chance that a sharp move pushes the position out of its active range. The pool has 1.48x volume-to-TVL, but no seven-day impermanent-loss or tick-range history is available to quantify recent efficiency.
The risk is driven by MET's volatility, possible thin liquidity outside this pool, and the chance that a sharp move pushes the position out of its active range. The pool has 1.48x volume-to-TVL, but no seven-day impermanent-loss or tick-range history is available to quantify recent efficiency.
For MET-USDC, consider exiting when MET leaves the chosen range and cannot be actively rebalanced, or when TVL, volume, or fee generation deteriorates enough that the fee stream no longer compensates for inventory risk. A sustained reduction in 1.48x or a collapse in 121.7% would weaken the pool's current fee-based case.
For MET-USDC, consider exiting when MET leaves the chosen range and cannot be actively rebalanced, or when TVL, volume, or fee generation deteriorates enough that the fee stream no longer compensates for inventory risk. A sustained reduction in 1.48x or a collapse in 121.7% would weaken the pool's current fee-based case.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history and range persistence are unavailable. Theoretical recovery depends on future fee income, represented by 121.7%, continued volume, and whether MET returns toward the price relationship at which the position was opened.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history and range persistence are unavailable. Theoretical recovery depends on future fee income, represented by 121.7%, continued volume, and whether MET returns toward the price relationship at which the position was opened.
