WealthVille
XIN
X
BTC
B

XIN-BTCon Raydium CLMMCLMMHigh Yield

Chain
Solana
TVL
TVL $7.46
APR
500.0% APR
24h Volume
$76.54 24h vol
Fee tier
1.00% fee
Pool address
6aQx9LgBbrfH · observed 2026-08-25
17F · Poor

Wealthville Score

Verdict EXIT · 70% confidence

ai_engine=exitstrong EXIT signal: unopposed
How this score works →
Enter15

new capital

Hold20

keep position

Exit80

urgency to leave

A Wealthville Score of 17/100 with Enter 15/100, Hold 20/100, and Exit 80/100 supports the live EXIT verdict, driven by ai_engine=hold. The pool ranks #938 of 4410 raydium-clmm pools, placing it in a middle segment rather than among the strongest or weakest candidates. The assessment would worsen with a TVL drain, further volume deterioration, or fee-yield collapse, and could improve if sustained trading activity increased fee generation without comparable liquidity dilution.

Computed 2026-08-24 17:31 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.

Liquidityhelp

lock

$7.46

Total value locked

$76.54

24h volume

×10 turnover

Yieldhelp

trending_up

500.0%

advertised APR

Fee yield, annualized

55447.0%

adjusted · net of IL (est.)

1.00% fee

My Position

account_balance_wallet
Live DataUpdated 825m agoTVL 1.8%local_fire_departmentHigh Activity
block

AI Verdict

Avoid

WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.

check_circleFee-driven yield: 100% of APR from trading fees
check_circleHigh swap activity: vol/TVL ratio 10.26x
tips_and_updates

Use a deliberately bounded price range and rebalance when the market reaches either range boundary; if volume remains weak while TVL falls, exit rather than widening the range to preserve nominal fee exposure.

syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background

table_chart

Performance Breakdown

Metric24h / Day7d / Week30d / Month
Total APR500.0%
Fee APR500.0%
Volume$76.54
Fees Earned$0.77

Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.

analytics

Efficiency Metrics

Computed

Deterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.

Sustainable Gross APY
55447.6%(trailing 7d fees)
Impermanent-Loss Drag
−0.6%(realized, 30d annualized)
Adjusted Net APY (est.)
55447.0%(after IL + repositioning)
Volume / TVL Ratio (24h)
10.26x
Fee Yield per $1 TVL / Day
$0.1028
Fee APR Sustainability
100% from trading fees(sustainable)
leaderboard

Pool Rankings

compare_arrows

#1 of 1 XIN-BTC pools

by AI Farmer Score

hub

#1608 of 13158 on raydium-clmm

by AI Farmer Score

lightbulb

How This Pool Works

Beginner Friendly

This page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the XIN-BTC liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.

Providing liquidity here means depositing XIN and BTC into the pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the value and balance of your deposit can change as XIN moves against BTC, and withdrawing may be harder when activity is low.

description

Pool Analysis

trending_upYield Source Breakdown

Reported yield decomposes into 500.0% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards, with 100% of yield fee-derived. No reward APR is currently represented, so emission decay is not reducing the displayed reward component; however, future incentives and their duration are not established. Fee income remains dependent on trading volume and liquidity conditions.

shieldRisk Assessment

Seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable, and seven-day tick-in-range history is also unavailable, so recent price divergence and range efficiency cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, XIN-BTC carries rapid repricing, thin-exit-liquidity, and token-specific failure risks. Emission decay is not currently the main risk because rewards contribute no displayed APR, but any later incentive program should be evaluated for its expiry and exit effects.

tollXIN Context

XIN is the memecoin side of this pair, so an LP is exposed directly to its price moves rather than only earning fees on swaps. The available pool data does not establish XIN's liquidity depth elsewhere; sharp XIN moves can create impermanent loss, while weak external liquidity can make rebalancing or exiting more costly.

tollBTC Context

BTC provides the reference asset against which XIN's relative price is measured in this pool. BTC generally has deeper external liquidity than a memecoin such as XIN, but venue-specific BTC depth is not provided here; a large XIN-BTC price move can still shift the position away from its intended asset mix.

lightbulbSimple Explanation

Providing liquidity here means depositing XIN and BTC into the pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but the value and balance of your deposit can change as XIN moves against BTC, and withdrawing may be harder when activity is low.

token

Token Details

XIN
XINMixinSolana
Explorer

Mixin (XIN) — one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

BTC
BTCBitcoinSolana
Explorer

Bitcoin (BTC) — one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

info

Pool Details

Pool Address
6aQx9LgBJPuJNqekci3pZWwLtxy2mnJYDD7GUR4NbrfH
Protocol
Raydium CLMM
Chain
solana
Fee Tier
Pool Type
Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
Token A
XIN (4s4H5v4T…)
Token B
BTC (CvJmpFKM…)
Created
5/22/2026
lock

Non-Custodial

Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.

source

Verified Data Sources

Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield

psychology

AI-Powered Analysis

Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data

⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.

quiz

Frequently Asked Questions

The current displayed APR is composed of 500.0% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, so reward emission decay is not currently subtracting from the reported return. Future emissions could change, while fee income will still follow trading volume.

The current displayed APR is composed of 500.0% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, so reward emission decay is not currently subtracting from the reported return. Future emissions could change, while fee income will still follow trading volume.

Because the current reward component is 0.0%, incentive expiry would not remove a displayed reward stream at present. The remaining return would be trading-fee income of 500.0%, which can decline if volume weakens.

Because the current reward component is 0.0%, incentive expiry would not remove a displayed reward stream at present. The remaining return would be trading-fee income of 500.0%, which can decline if volume weakens.

Risk is elevated because XIN can reprice quickly, external liquidity depth is not established here, and recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable. The pool's current fee-only structure also leaves LPs dependent on trading activity rather than emissions.

Risk is elevated because XIN can reprice quickly, external liquidity depth is not established here, and recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable. The pool's current fee-only structure also leaves LPs dependent on trading activity rather than emissions.

Consider exiting when XIN's external liquidity deteriorates, the pool's TVL falls, or fee income no longer compensates for range management and price-divergence risk. A sustained decline in 10.26x is a direct warning that the position is generating less activity per unit of liquidity.

Consider exiting when XIN's external liquidity deteriorates, the pool's TVL falls, or fee income no longer compensates for range management and price-divergence risk. A sustained decline in 10.26x is a direct warning that the position is generating less activity per unit of liquidity.

A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable. In principle, fees of 500.0% must accumulate enough to offset the realized loss from XIN-BTC price divergence, and the time required depends on future volume and price behavior.

A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable. In principle, fees of 500.0% must accumulate enough to offset the realized loss from XIN-BTC price divergence, and the time required depends on future volume and price behavior.

Latest insights

Research, Recaps & Solana Alpha

Data-driven yield analysis and weekly market wraps — written for active LPs.

All insights