Wealthville Score
Verdict REDUCE · 58% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 42/100 places this pool near the middle of the assessed meteora-dlmm set, ranked #542 of 1696 pools, but its component scores are asymmetric: Enter is 37/100, Hold is 47/100, and Exit is 50/100. The live verdict is REDUCE because the ai engine indicates hold while recent TVL bleed caps the result at reduce. The assessment would improve if TVL stabilized and fee generation persisted; it would deteriorate if liquidity continued draining, trading volume weakened, or 25.8% collapsed.
Computed 2026-08-23 11:02 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$52.39K
Total value locked
$34.78K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up29.4%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 4.1%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Proceed with Caution
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter with a range centered on the current MET/USDC price, then exit or reposition if the pool shows sustained TVL contraction or if 25.8% falls below the minimum fee rate required for your risk and management costs. Do not leave the position unattended through a material MET price move because the seven-day range-utilization record is unavailable.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 29.4% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 25.8% | — | — |
| Volume | $34.78K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $32.88 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#10 of 32 MET-USDC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#480 of 2800 on meteora-dlmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 3% of all Solana pools
overall rank #2107 of 95923
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the MET-USDC liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing MET and USDC into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your holdings can shift toward MET or USDC as prices move, and a large MET move can leave you with less favorable results than simply holding both assets.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The quoted total APR of 29.4% decomposes into 25.8% from trading fees and 3.6% from rewards. Fee sustainability is 88%, so the current yield case depends on continued swap activity rather than emissions. As a MEMECOIN pool, emission decay and changing trader interest can reduce future realized APR even when the displayed fee rate is high; the available data does not establish a rewards-expiry schedule.
shieldRisk Assessment
A recent seven-day impermanent-loss reading is not available, and seven-day tick-in-range exposure is also not reported, so historical price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified here. MET-USDC carries the usual concentrated-liquidity risk of a memecoin pair: sharp MET moves can push the position out of range or leave the LP holding more of the underperforming asset. Emission decay and fast exit timing matter because a decline in incentives or trading activity can remove the fee and reward rationale before the position is rebalanced.
tollMET Context
MET is the volatile side of this pair and supplies the primary directional risk for the LP. Liquidity depth for MET outside this pool is not established by the supplied metrics, so a sharp MET move may coincide with wider execution costs and faster range displacement. If MET rises or falls materially against USDC, the LP's asset mix changes and can crystallize impermanent loss when withdrawn.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is the stable reference asset and the accounting side of the pair. Its role reduces one source of price volatility, but it does not protect the position from MET-specific drawdowns, range exit, or adverse rebalancing. USDC liquidity elsewhere is not quantified here; its practical value is mainly as the less volatile leg against which MET is priced.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing MET and USDC into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your holdings can shift toward MET or USDC as prices move, and a large MET move can leave you with less favorable results than simply holding both assets.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 9Jhn8FhQo1h4XHqrzzb7iJhU1K8xuM81TtppixJscUp1
- Protocol
- Meteora DLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- MET (METvsvVR…)
- Token B
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
500%
APR
2%
APR
0%
APR
133%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-dlmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Emission decay reduces the reward component over time, but the current MET-USDC breakdown is 25.8% in fees and 3.6% in rewards. Because 88% of yield is fee-funded, future APR still depends primarily on trading volume rather than emissions.
Emission decay reduces the reward component over time, but the current MET-USDC breakdown is 25.8% in fees and 3.6% in rewards. Because 88% of yield is fee-funded, future APR still depends primarily on trading volume rather than emissions.
If incentives expire, the reward component would fall away and the displayed APR would move toward the fee component, 25.8%, assuming trading activity is unchanged. For this pool, the current reward contribution is 3.6%, so the main remaining justification would be fee generation.
If incentives expire, the reward component would fall away and the displayed APR would move toward the fee component, 25.8%, assuming trading activity is unchanged. For this pool, the current reward contribution is 3.6%, so the main remaining justification would be fee generation.
Risk is high relative to a stable or large-cap pair because MET can move sharply and push a concentrated position out of range. The pool has $52K of liquidity and a 0.66x volume-to-liquidity ratio, but recent TVL pressure and the absence of a reported seven-day IL history make realized risk harder to estimate.
Risk is high relative to a stable or large-cap pair because MET can move sharply and push a concentrated position out of range. The pool has $52K of liquidity and a 0.66x volume-to-liquidity ratio, but recent TVL pressure and the absence of a reported seven-day IL history make realized risk harder to estimate.
For MET-USDC, use sustained TVL contraction, a material fall in 25.8%, or a large MET move that pushes the position outside its intended range as exit or repositioning signals. Exit timing matters because memecoin volume and emissions can decay faster than an LP can recover management costs or price divergence.
For MET-USDC, use sustained TVL contraction, a material fall in 25.8%, or a large MET move that pushes the position outside its intended range as exit or repositioning signals. Exit timing matters because memecoin volume and emissions can decay faster than an LP can recover management costs or price divergence.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because the pool does not provide a usable seven-day IL history or range-utilization reading. Fees accrue at the rate represented by 25.8%, but that annualized figure is not a guarantee and may not offset impermanent loss if MET moves sharply or volume declines.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because the pool does not provide a usable seven-day IL history or range-utilization reading. Fees accrue at the rate represented by 25.8%, but that annualized figure is not a guarantee and may not offset impermanent loss if MET moves sharply or volume declines.
