WealthVille
MET
M
SOL
S

MET-SOLon Meteora DLMMHigh Yield

Chain
Solana
TVL
TVL $1.47M
APR
500.0% APR
24h Volume
$5.12M 24h vol
Pool address
AsSyvUnb…5D9x · observed 2026-10-07
59C · Fair

Wealthville Score

Verdict HOLD · 62% confidence

ai_engine=hold
How this score works →
Enter58

new capital

Hold60

keep position

Exit22

urgency to leave

The Wealthville Score of 59/100 places this pool in a hold posture rather than a clear entry signal: Enter is 58/100, Hold is 60/100, and Exit is 22/100, with the live verdict HOLD. Its rank of #51 among 2612 meteora-dlmm pools indicates a relatively strong position within the tracked set, but the stated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold, not a guarantee of future fee income. The assessment would change if TVL drains, volume falls relative to liquidity, fee APR collapses, MET remains outside LP ranges, or new emissions materially alter the yield mix.

Computed 2026-10-07 17:58 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.

Liquidityhelp

lock

$1.47M

Total value locked

$5.12M

24h volume

×3.5 turnover

Yieldhelp

trending_up

500.0%

advertised APR

Fee yield, annualized

≈ 190.7%

adjusted · net of IL (est.)

My Position

account_balance_wallet
Live DataUpdated 12m agoTVL ↑7.2%
schedule

AI Verdict

Wait & Monitor

WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.

check_circleHigh swap activity: vol/TVL ratio 3.49x
warningElevated risk score: 63/100
tips_and_updates

Use a concentrated range centered on the current MET/SOL price, and rebalance or exit when spot reaches the outer edge of that range or when fee accrual no longer compensates for the position's changing MET exposure.

syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background

table_chart

Performance Breakdown

Metric24h / Day7d / Week30d / Month
Total APR500.0%——
Fee APR244.1%——
Volume$5.12M——
Fees Earned$9.59K——

Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.

analytics

Efficiency Metrics

Computed

Deterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.

Sustainable Gross APY
238.7%(trailing 24h fees)
Impermanent-Loss Drag
−48.0%(realized, 30d annualized)
Adjusted Net APY (est.)
190.7%(after IL + repositioning)
Volume / TVL Ratio (24h)
3.49x
Fee Yield per $1 TVL / Day
$0.0065
Fee APR Sustainability
49% from trading fees(reward-dependent)
leaderboard

Pool Rankings

compare_arrows

#3 of 29 MET-SOL pools

by AI Farmer Score

hub

#68 of 4043 on meteora-dlmm

by AI Farmer Score

leaderboard

Top 1% of all Solana pools

overall rank #1301 of 132693

lightbulb

How This Pool Works

Beginner Friendly

This page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the MET-SOL liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.

Providing liquidity here means depositing MET and SOL into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive part of the trading fees. Your holdings can become unbalanced when MET and SOL prices move, and the fee income may not cover that change.

description

Pool Analysis

trending_upYield Source Breakdown

Total APR decomposes into 244.1% from trading fees and 255.9% from rewards, so 49% of the stated yield is fee-derived. The current economics therefore depend on continued MET-SOL swap activity rather than an active reward stream. Reward duration is not established by the supplied data, so no reward-expiry date or remaining reward period should be assumed.

shieldRisk Assessment

The available seven-day impermanent-loss reading is represented by N/A, while the seven-day share of time spent in the active price range is represented by N/A; these should be checked before treating the fee APR as realized LP return. As a MEMECOIN pool, MET-SOL adds sharp price-move, liquidity-migration, and adverse-selection risk, particularly if MET moves outside the chosen range. Emission decay is still relevant to future incentives even though the current reward component is 255.9%, and exit timing matters if liquidity or trading activity deteriorates.

tollMET Context

MET is the volatile side of this pair and supplies the memecoin-specific risk in the LP position. This pool provides one liquidity venue for MET against SOL, but the supplied metrics do not establish MET's liquidity depth elsewhere; a sharp MET repricing can change the LP's token mix and make the fee stream insufficient to offset inventory loss.

tollSOL Context

SOL is the quote-side asset against which MET's value is measured in this pool. SOL's price movement changes the MET/SOL range and can push liquidity out of range, while the supplied metrics do not establish how much alternative SOL liquidity is available across other venues.

lightbulbSimple Explanation

Providing liquidity here means depositing MET and SOL into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive part of the trading fees. Your holdings can become unbalanced when MET and SOL prices move, and the fee income may not cover that change.

token

Token Details

MET
METMeteoraSolana
Explorer

Meteora (MET) — one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

SOL
SOLWrapped SOLSolana

Solana is a high-performance blockchain supporting builders around the world creating crypto apps that scale today.

info

Pool Details

Pool Address
AsSyvUnbfaZJPRrNh3kUuvZTeHKoMVWEoHz86f4Q5D9x
Protocol
Meteora DLMM
Chain
solana
Fee Tier
—
Pool Type
AMM
Token A
MET (METvsvVR…)
Token B
SOL (So111111…)
Created
5/22/2026
lock

Non-Custodial

Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.

source

Verified Data Sources

Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield

psychology

AI-Powered Analysis

Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data

⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.

quiz

Frequently Asked Questions

The current reward portion is 255.9%, while fee income is 244.1% and total APR is 500.0%. If future incentives are added and then decay, only the reward component would fall directly; the fee component still depends on trading volume.

The current reward portion is 255.9%, while fee income is 244.1% and total APR is 500.0%. If future incentives are added and then decay, only the reward component would fall directly; the fee component still depends on trading volume.

There is currently no stated reward contribution beyond 255.9%, so an incentive expiry would not remove the fee-derived 244.1%. The remaining yield would depend on trading activity, represented by $5.1M volume and $1.5M of liquidity.

There is currently no stated reward contribution beyond 255.9%, so an incentive expiry would not remove the fee-derived 244.1%. The remaining yield would depend on trading activity, represented by $5.1M volume and $1.5M of liquidity.

The risk is material because MET can move sharply against SOL, move liquidity outside its active range, or lose market activity. Review N/A and N/A when available, and do not treat 500.0% as a fixed return.

The risk is material because MET can move sharply against SOL, move liquidity outside its active range, or lose market activity. Review N/A and N/A when available, and do not treat 500.0% as a fixed return.

Consider exiting when MET reaches the edge of your range, when TVL or volume deteriorates enough to reduce fee income, or when the position's MET exposure no longer fits your risk limit. For this pool, compare those conditions with $5.1M, $1.5M, and 244.1%.

Consider exiting when MET reaches the edge of your range, when TVL or volume deteriorates enough to reduce fee income, or when the position's MET exposure no longer fits your risk limit. For this pool, compare those conditions with $5.1M, $1.5M, and 244.1%.

No defensible break-even period can be calculated without a usable impermanent-loss history and a forecast of future fees. Compare the reported N/A with realized fee accrual from 244.1%, remembering that 500.0% can change as trading activity changes.

No defensible break-even period can be calculated without a usable impermanent-loss history and a forecast of future fees. Compare the reported N/A with realized fee accrual from 244.1%, remembering that 500.0% can change as trading activity changes.

Latest insights

Research, Recaps & Solana Alpha

Data-driven yield analysis and weekly market wraps — written for active LPs.

All insights