new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 58/100, with Enter at 57/100, Hold at 60/100, and Exit at 22/100; the live verdict is HOLD and the stated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold. Its rank of #88 of 1696 meteora-dlmm pools places it relatively high in the listed set, but that ranking does not remove dependence on fee volume or memecoin price behavior. The assessment would weaken if TVL drained, volume fell enough to compress fee income, or fee APR collapsed; it would improve only if liquidity and sustained trading activity strengthened without a corresponding increase in price-risk exposure.
Computed 2026-08-23 19:19 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$1.13M
Total value locked
$1.97M
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up218.2%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 111.5%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a defined range-management rule: monitor daily volume against TVL and rebalance or exit if volume remains below the pool's TVL across consecutive observations, or if MET liquidity becomes materially thinner. Do not leave a concentrated position unattended through a sharp MET move.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 218.2% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 115.9% | — | — |
| Volume | $1.97M | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $3.60K | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 29 MET-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#89 of 2800 on meteora-dlmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 1% of all Solana pools
overall rank #626 of 95923
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the MET-SOL liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing MET and SOL into a shared pool used by traders. You receive trading fees, but the amounts of MET and SOL you hold can change, and a large MET price move can leave you with more of the riskier asset.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 115.9% fee APR and 102.2% reward APR. 53% of the reported yield comes from trading fees, so the stated APR is exposed to changes in volume, fee capture, and liquidity. A reward schedule or remaining incentive duration is not established for this pool, and the current reward contribution is zero.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range history are not available, so recent loss behavior and range utilization cannot be assessed from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, MET-SOL carries token-specific price-collapse and liquidity risks; MET/SOL divergence can leave an LP holding more of the underperforming asset. Emission decay is not currently the main risk because reward yield is zero, but exit timing matters if trading volume, fee generation, or MET liquidity deteriorates.
tollMET Context
MET is the memecoin leg of this pair, so an LP is exposed to both MET price risk and inventory changes caused by the pool's pricing curve. MET liquidity outside this pool is not quantified here; a sharp MET move can therefore increase slippage and leave the LP holding a larger MET allocation after rebalancing.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the more established Solana-side asset in the pair and acts as the counter-asset against which MET performance is measured. SOL generally has deeper market liquidity elsewhere than a memecoin, but the relevant external depth is not quantified in these pool metrics; SOL/MET divergence can still produce impermanent loss and inventory imbalance.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing MET and SOL into a shared pool used by traders. You receive trading fees, but the amounts of MET and SOL you hold can change, and a large MET price move can leave you with more of the riskier asset.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- AsSyvUnbfaZJPRrNh3kUuvZTeHKoMVWEoHz86f4Q5D9x
- Protocol
- Meteora DLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- MET (METvsvVR…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
500%
APR
2%
APR
0%
APR
133%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-dlmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only APR is 102.2%, so emissions are not contributing to the reported yield at present. The pool's APR is instead 115.9% from trading fees, which can change as volume and liquidity change.
The current reward-only APR is 102.2%, so emissions are not contributing to the reported yield at present. The pool's APR is instead 115.9% from trading fees, which can change as volume and liquidity change.
The pool is already reporting 102.2% reward APR, with 53% of yield from fees. If incentives are added and later expire, the reward component would disappear, while fee income would remain dependent on trading activity rather than emissions.
The pool is already reporting 102.2% reward APR, with 53% of yield from fees. If incentives are added and later expire, the reward component would disappear, while fee income would remain dependent on trading activity rather than emissions.
Risk is high relative to a pool pairing two established assets because MET can fall sharply, become less liquid, or diverge substantially from SOL. Fee income is 115.9%, but seven-day impermanent-loss and range-utilization history is not available to quantify how that income has offset inventory risk.
Risk is high relative to a pool pairing two established assets because MET can fall sharply, become less liquid, or diverge substantially from SOL. Fee income is 115.9%, but seven-day impermanent-loss and range-utilization history is not available to quantify how that income has offset inventory risk.
Use a predefined exit rule tied to this pool: exit or reduce exposure if daily volume stays below TVL, fee generation falls materially from 115.9%, or MET liquidity and price support deteriorate. A sustained decline in trading activity matters because 53% of current yield comes from fees.
Use a predefined exit rule tied to this pool: exit or reduce exposure if daily volume stays below TVL, fee generation falls materially from 115.9%, or MET liquidity and price support deteriorate. A sustained decline in trading activity matters because 53% of current yield comes from fees.
There is no defensible fixed break-even period because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income is variable. A static estimate would compare the loss against 115.9%, but that APR is not guaranteed and can fall if pool volume declines.
There is no defensible fixed break-even period because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income is variable. A static estimate would compare the loss against 115.9%, but that APR is not guaranteed and can fall if pool volume declines.
