Wealthville Score
Verdict HOLD · 57% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 64/100 places RENDER-SOL in a middle zone: Enter at 60/100, Hold at 68/100, and Exit at 15/100, with the live verdict HOLD. The ai_engine=hold driver indicates that current fee activity and pool conditions support retaining exposure, but not an unqualified entry; the pool ranks #292 of 997 meteora-dlmm pools. The assessment would weaken if TVL drains, volume falls, or fee APR collapses, and would strengthen only if liquidity and fee generation persist without worsening relative-price risk.
Computed 2026-08-22 02:36 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$47.92K
Total value locked
$380.45K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up500.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 662.7%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a monitored range rather than a set-and-forget position, and rebalance or exit if the position spends a sustained period outside the active range or if pool TVL falls materially while 7.94x declines, since fee income may no longer offset memecoin price risk.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $380.45K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $875.24 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 RENDER-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#23 of 2800 on meteora-dlmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 1% of all Solana pools
overall rank #503 of 95923
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the RENDER-SOL liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing both RENDER and SOL into the pool so traders can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but large price differences between RENDER and SOL can leave you with a less valuable mix of assets than if you had simply held them.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated APR decomposes into 500.0% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 100% means the displayed yield is currently sourced from swaps rather than incentives. Reward dependency remains unverified, so the fee component is the relevant basis for assessing persistence; no time-bound reward schedule is established.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-in-range history are not reported, so realized loss and range utilization cannot be quantified from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, RENDER-SOL is exposed to sharp relative price moves between RENDER and SOL, which can increase inventory divergence and reduce fee recovery. Emission decay is less central while reward yield is absent, but an LP should still define an exit point because memecoin liquidity and trading activity can contract quickly.
tollRENDER Context
RENDER is the non-SOL asset in this pair, so its price moves determine how the pool's inventory shifts relative to SOL. The supplied metrics do not establish RENDER's liquidity depth elsewhere on Solana; a sharp RENDER move can create impermanent loss even when swap fees are high.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base asset paired against RENDER and provides the comparison price for the LP position. SOL strength or weakness against RENDER changes the pool's token composition, while broader SOL liquidity may make SOL easier to trade than RENDER outside this pool; the resulting relative move, not SOL direction alone, drives LP divergence.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing both RENDER and SOL into the pool so traders can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but large price differences between RENDER and SOL can leave you with a less valuable mix of assets than if you had simply held them.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- B5dL1cPzmzhz3F4ucoUzKnTNSnpybEoHrC4McTYMHkef
- Protocol
- Meteora DLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- RENDER (rndrizKT…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
3%
APR
0%
APR
4%
APR
5%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-dlmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, while fee APR is 500.0% and 100% of yield comes from fees. If emissions are introduced and later decay, the displayed APR would fall by the reward component unless trading volume and fee generation increase.
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, while fee APR is 500.0% and 100% of yield comes from fees. If emissions are introduced and later decay, the displayed APR would fall by the reward component unless trading volume and fee generation increase.
No reward contribution is currently reflected because reward-only APR is 0.0%. If a future incentive program expires, the remaining return would depend primarily on 500.0% from trading fees rather than farm payments.
No reward contribution is currently reflected because reward-only APR is 0.0%. If a future incentive program expires, the remaining return would depend primarily on 500.0% from trading fees rather than farm payments.
Risk is material because RENDER can move sharply against SOL and the pool is classified as MEMECOIN. Fee income is currently 500.0%, but unavailable recent loss and range data prevent a reliable estimate of how well those fees offset inventory divergence.
Risk is material because RENDER can move sharply against SOL and the pool is classified as MEMECOIN. Fee income is currently 500.0%, but unavailable recent loss and range data prevent a reliable estimate of how well those fees offset inventory divergence.
Consider exiting when liquidity or trading activity deteriorates enough that fee income no longer justifies RENDER-SOL price risk, or when the position remains outside its intended range. A sustained TVL decline, falling 7.94x, or collapse in 500.0% would be concrete warning signals.
Consider exiting when liquidity or trading activity deteriorates enough that fee income no longer justifies RENDER-SOL price risk, or when the position remains outside its intended range. A sustained TVL decline, falling 7.94x, or collapse in 500.0% would be concrete warning signals.
There is no defensible fixed break-even time because recent impermanent-loss and range-history data are not reported. Break-even depends on the actual price path and future fees; 500.0% is an annualized estimate, not a guaranteed recovery rate.
There is no defensible fixed break-even time because recent impermanent-loss and range-history data are not reported. Break-even depends on the actual price path and future fees; 500.0% is an annualized estimate, not a guaranteed recovery rate.
