Wealthville Score
Verdict HOLD · 56% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 63/100 produces Enter 57/100, Hold 70/100, and Exit 11/100, with the live verdict HOLD. The stated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold, and the pool ranks #253 of 997 meteora-dlmm pools, placing it above many listed pools but not among the highest-ranked group. In practical terms, the current case supports monitoring an existing position rather than treating the score as a strong entry signal: the return is fee-dependent, recent IL and range data are unavailable, and the memecoin exposure remains material. The assessment would weaken if TVL drains, trading volume falls, fee APR collapses, or CARDS volatility repeatedly pushes liquidity out of range; sustained fee generation with stable liquidity and better risk data would strengthen it.
Computed 2026-08-21 09:37 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$380.73K
Total value locked
$87.53K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up112.4%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 63.8%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a conservative range centered on the current CARDS-USDC price and review it whenever CARDS moves materially enough that the position approaches either boundary; exit or redeploy if the position leaves range, TVL begins draining, or fee volume no longer supports 75.4%.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 112.4% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 75.4% | — | — |
| Volume | $87.53K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $805.26 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#7 of 15 CARDS-USDC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#355 of 2723 on meteora-dlmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1492 of 93052
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the CARDS-USDC liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing CARDS and USDC into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but you may end up with a different mix of CARDS and USDC, and the value can fall if CARDS moves sharply or your chosen price range is left behind.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into a fee-only APR of 75.4% and a reward-only APR of 37.0%. Fee sustainability is 67%, so the stated return depends on trading activity rather than emissions. Reward dependency is not established, and no reward-duration estimate is available; fee APR can still fall as volume, spreads, or liquidity conditions change.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and the percentage of time the position stayed in range are not reported, so realized IL and range efficiency cannot be assessed from this sheet. As a MEMECOIN pool, CARDS-USDC carries substantial price-divergence risk if CARDS moves sharply against USDC, and concentrated liquidity can become inactive outside its selected range. The pool lifecycle is not established; emission decay is less immediate here because current stated yield is fee-based, but exit timing still matters if CARDS volatility rises, liquidity drains, or fee volume weakens.
tollCARDS Context
CARDS is the volatile asset in this pair, while USDC provides the accounting and settlement side of the position. Liquidity depth for CARDS outside this pool is not established by the supplied metrics, so a sharp CARDS move can create both inventory imbalance and execution risk. For the LP, CARDS appreciation or depreciation relative to USDC changes the position's token composition and can produce impermanent loss.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is the stablecoin side of CARDS-USDC and is intended to track the dollar, making it the less volatile asset in the pair. Its broader liquidity depth is not quantified here, so the pool's usable exit liquidity should not be inferred from USDC's general market presence. When CARDS moves materially, the LP may hold more USDC after selling into the move or more CARDS after a decline.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing CARDS and USDC into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but you may end up with a different mix of CARDS and USDC, and the value can fall if CARDS moves sharply or your chosen price range is left behind.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- DL3WhGJRCuKJPcE95YRJxHbRer5ofqc6QzxEC1rRajK3
- Protocol
- Meteora DLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- CARDS (CARDSccU…)
- Token B
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
2%
APR
0%
APR
8%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-dlmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current stated reward-only APR is 37.0%, while fee-only APR is 75.4% and fee sustainability is 67%. Emission decay therefore has no reported current contribution to the APR, but any future reward program would be temporary and could decline without affecting the fee component.
The current stated reward-only APR is 37.0%, while fee-only APR is 75.4% and fee sustainability is 67%. Emission decay therefore has no reported current contribution to the APR, but any future reward program would be temporary and could decline without affecting the fee component.
No reward APR is currently attributed to CARDS-USDC, so the stated Total APR of 112.4% is presently represented by fees rather than farm incentives. If incentives are introduced and later expire, the reward component would disappear and returns would rely on 75.4% and subsequent trading volume.
No reward APR is currently attributed to CARDS-USDC, so the stated Total APR of 112.4% is presently represented by fees rather than farm incentives. If incentives are introduced and later expire, the reward component would disappear and returns would rely on 75.4% and subsequent trading volume.
The main risks are CARDS price volatility, impermanent loss, concentrated liquidity leaving its selected range, and reduced exit liquidity during a selloff. The pool's stated Total APR is 112.4%, but that return is fee-based and does not remove the risk of CARDS falling against USDC.
The main risks are CARDS price volatility, impermanent loss, concentrated liquidity leaving its selected range, and reduced exit liquidity during a selloff. The pool's stated Total APR is 112.4%, but that return is fee-based and does not remove the risk of CARDS falling against USDC.
Consider exiting or redeploying when CARDS approaches or leaves your range, pool TVL falls materially from $381K, or fee generation no longer justifies the volatility exposure. A sharp CARDS move, persistent one-sided inventory, or deteriorating execution liquidity is also a practical exit signal.
Consider exiting or redeploying when CARDS approaches or leaves your range, pool TVL falls materially from $381K, or fee generation no longer justifies the volatility exposure. A sharp CARDS move, persistent one-sided inventory, or deteriorating execution liquidity is also a practical exit signal.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported and fee income varies with trading volume and range placement. The fee-based headline of 75.4% is an annualized indication, not a guaranteed recovery time for losses caused by CARDS price divergence.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported and fee income varies with trading volume and range placement. The fee-based headline of 75.4% is an annualized indication, not a guaranteed recovery time for losses caused by CARDS price divergence.
