gweil-ETHon Raydium CLMMCLMM
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $99.85K
- APR
- 0.0% APR
- 24h Volume
- $5.73 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 1.00% fee
- Pool address
- GUrRxvnW…meWR · observed 2026-10-21
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter 15/100, Hold 20/100, and Exit 80/100; the live verdict is EXIT. Its rank is #1720 of 8415 raydium-clmm pools, while the scanner is CRITICAL, the AI engine says hold, and the strong EXIT signal is unopposed. In practical terms, the score does not support adding liquidity under current conditions; the position would need sustained trading activity, healthier liquidity retention, and a less severe scanner assessment to change. A TVL drain, further volume decline, or any collapse in fee income would reinforce the current assessment, while a durable increase in volume relative to TVL could improve it.
Computed 2026-10-19 11:53 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$99.85K
Total value locked
$5.73
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -0.1%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a narrow, actively monitored range and set an exit trigger for a sustained loss of fee activity or a material TVL drain; with 0.00x volume-to-liquidity and a live EXIT signal, do not leave the position unattended after price moves outside the selected range.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $5.73 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.06 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 gweil-ETH pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1445 of 19264 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 13% of all Solana pools
overall rank #18303 of 147092
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the gweil-ETH liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing GWEIL and ETH into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You may receive a small share of trading fees, but the current pool has low activity, and large price changes can leave you holding more of the weaker asset.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 0.0% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards, with 100% of yield sourced from fees. Because the reward component is absent, this pool is primarily routed for swaps, not LP yield. Reward dependency and any emission schedule are not established, so there is no confirmed reward duration to use for planning; memecoin LPs should still account for possible emission changes and exit before fee activity deteriorates.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss history is not available, and recent tick-in-range occupancy is also unreported, so realized range efficiency cannot be verified. As a MEMECOIN pool, the main risks are sharp GWEIL price moves against ETH, rapid liquidity withdrawal, and limited exit depth. Emission decay is relevant even though the current reward component is zero: if incentives appear later, their eventual reduction should not be treated as durable yield, and exit timing matters because falling volume can reduce fee income quickly.
tollgweil Context
GWEIL is the memecoin side of this pair, so its price movement determines whether the position accumulates more GWEIL or more ETH as arbitrage rebalances the pool. GWEIL liquidity depth outside this pool is not established here; thin external liquidity would increase slippage and make exits more difficult. A sharp GWEIL move can therefore create inventory imbalance and impermanent loss relative to simply holding the two assets.
tollETH Context
ETH is the reference asset paired against GWEIL and generally provides the deeper market benchmark for valuing the position. ETH price changes also affect the pair's relative price even when GWEIL is unchanged in dollar terms. If ETH rises or falls materially against GWEIL, the AMM rebalances the LP's inventory toward the asset that has underperformed within the pair.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing GWEIL and ETH into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You may receive a small share of trading fees, but the current pool has low activity, and large price changes can leave you holding more of the weaker asset.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- GUrRxvnWVQSnbcz1eP9D5BqXwPZtRhmrqVfm5wY9meWR
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- gweil (CKvjP8Fr…)
- Token B
- ETH (7vfCXTUX…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 0.0%, while fee income is 0.0% and 100% of yield comes from fees. If emissions are introduced or reduced, the headline APR could change, but the current pool does not provide a confirmed reward schedule.
The current reward component is 0.0%, while fee income is 0.0% and 100% of yield comes from fees. If emissions are introduced or reduced, the headline APR could change, but the current pool does not provide a confirmed reward schedule.
There is currently no represented reward contribution beyond 0.0%, so an incentive expiry would not remove a current reward stream in the displayed APR. Fee income would remain 0.0%, subject to the pool's 0.00x trading activity relative to liquidity.
There is currently no represented reward contribution beyond 0.0%, so an incentive expiry would not remove a current reward stream in the displayed APR. Fee income would remain 0.0%, subject to the pool's 0.00x trading activity relative to liquidity.
Risk is elevated because GWEIL can move sharply against ETH, while this pool has $100K and only $6 in 24-hour volume. Seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-range history are unavailable, so recent loss and range efficiency cannot be assessed from the supplied data.
Risk is elevated because GWEIL can move sharply against ETH, while this pool has $100K and only $6 in 24-hour volume. Seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-range history are unavailable, so recent loss and range efficiency cannot be assessed from the supplied data.
For this pool, an exit is more defensible if trading activity weakens, TVL drains, price leaves the selected range, or the current EXIT signal persists. The low 0.00x ratio and scanner status make timely monitoring more important than waiting for a nominal APR improvement.
For this pool, an exit is more defensible if trading activity weakens, TVL drains, price leaves the selected range, or the current EXIT signal persists. The low 0.00x ratio and scanner status make timely monitoring more important than waiting for a nominal APR improvement.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee demand is limited. At 0.0%, recovery would depend on sustained fee generation and stable relative prices between GWEIL and ETH, not merely on the displayed APR.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee demand is limited. At 0.0%, recovery would depend on sustained fee generation and stable relative prices between GWEIL and ETH, not merely on the displayed APR.
