RENDER-USDCon Orca WhirlpoolWhirlpoolActive
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $32.61K
- APR
- 27.3% APR
- 24h Volume
- $8.92K 24h vol
- Pool address
- HAWNPF6U…M1MW · observed 2026-10-26
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
A 49/100 Wealthville Score with Enter 43/100, Hold 56/100, and Exit 24/100 supports the live HOLD assessment from ai_engine=hold, not a strong entry signal. The pool ranks #2450 of 4356 orca-whirlpool pools, placing it below the midpoint of the tracked set despite its fee-funded APR. The assessment would weaken if $33K drained, trading activity fell, or 27.3% collapsed; it would improve only if fee volume proved persistent and liquidity depth increased without relying on temporary incentives.
Computed 2026-10-26 18:32 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$32.61K
Total value locked
$8.92K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up27.3%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 23.4%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a monitored concentrated range and set a rebalance alert when the price reaches the outer tenth of that range. If the position moves out of range, or if $33K falls materially while volume no longer supports the current 0.27x, remove or resize liquidity rather than waiting for an emissions-based recovery.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 27.3% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 24.2% | — | — |
| Volume | $8.92K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $26.77 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#4 of 12 RENDER-USDC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1306 of 20205 on orca-whirlpool
by AI Farmer Score
Top 5% of all Solana pools
overall rank #6144 of 148664
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the RENDER-USDC liquidity pool on Orca Whirlpool. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing RENDER and USDC into the pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a share of swap fees, but a large RENDER price move can leave you with an unfavorable mix of RENDER and USDC, and withdrawing may be harder when the pool is thin.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield decomposes into 24.2% from swap fees and 3.2% from rewards. 88% means the displayed return is currently fee-funded, with no stated reward component to schedule or rely on; reward dependency remains unverified. The annualized figure can fall quickly if volume declines, even without a change in the pool's fee configuration.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and the share of time the position stayed in range are not available, so N/A and N/A cannot be used to estimate recent loss or range efficiency. RENDER's price volatility can move a concentrated position out of range and leave the LP holding more of one asset. As a MEMECOIN pool, emission schedules and exit timing matter: any future incentives may decay, while thin liquidity can make exiting during a selloff more difficult.
tollRENDER Context
RENDER is the volatile asset in this pair, while USDC is the quote asset used for pricing and settlement. The pool's $33K describes local RENDER-USDC depth, not RENDER's liquidity across other Solana venues; compare execution depth elsewhere before assuming this pool can absorb a large position. A RENDER price move changes the LP's inventory mix and can create impermanent loss relative to simply holding both assets.
tollUSDC Context
USDC provides the comparatively stable side of the RENDER-USDC pair and is the asset an LP may accumulate when RENDER falls. Its stability does not remove pool risk: RENDER volatility, concentrated-range exposure, and shallow local liquidity determine how the position behaves. USDC can also become the dominant inventory after a sustained RENDER decline, limiting participation in a later rebound.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing RENDER and USDC into the pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a share of swap fees, but a large RENDER price move can leave you with an unfavorable mix of RENDER and USDC, and withdrawing may be harder when the pool is thin.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- HAWNPF6UZ8YgWisd2gsECNSchdn3hQTEujsZtGxKM1MW
- Protocol
- Orca Whirlpool
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Whirlpool (CLMM)
- Token A
- RENDER (rndrizKT…)
- Token B
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
41%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll orca-whirlpool poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current return is 27.3%, split into 24.2% in fees and 3.2% in rewards, so the displayed APR is not currently dependent on a reward stream. If incentives are introduced later, emission decay would reduce the reward component while leaving fee income dependent on trading volume.
The current return is 27.3%, split into 24.2% in fees and 3.2% in rewards, so the displayed APR is not currently dependent on a reward stream. If incentives are introduced later, emission decay would reduce the reward component while leaving fee income dependent on trading volume.
There is no stated reward component in the current 3.2% figure, so an incentive expiry would not directly remove the reported fee yield. If future rewards are added, the position would then rely on 24.2% and ongoing swap activity after those rewards end.
There is no stated reward component in the current 3.2% figure, so an incentive expiry would not directly remove the reported fee yield. If future rewards are added, the position would then rely on 24.2% and ongoing swap activity after those rewards end.
Risk is elevated because RENDER can move sharply, the pool has $33K in local liquidity, and the position may leave its active range. The 27.3% return is fee-funded, but fees do not guarantee compensation for price divergence, thin exit liquidity, or a rapid fall in trading activity.
Risk is elevated because RENDER can move sharply, the pool has $33K in local liquidity, and the position may leave its active range. The 27.3% return is fee-funded, but fees do not guarantee compensation for price divergence, thin exit liquidity, or a rapid fall in trading activity.
Consider exiting when the position leaves its range, when $33K falls materially, or when volume no longer supports the current 0.27x. A sharp RENDER move or the end of any future incentive program is also a reason to reassess rather than assume the current 27.3% will persist.
Consider exiting when the position leaves its range, when $33K falls materially, or when volume no longer supports the current 0.27x. A sharp RENDER move or the end of any future incentive program is also a reason to reassess rather than assume the current 27.3% will persist.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss and range-history readings are unavailable. The reference point is ongoing fee income of 24.2%, but that annualized figure is variable and may not offset future RENDER price divergence within any fixed period.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss and range-history readings are unavailable. The reference point is ongoing fee income of 24.2%, but that annualized figure is variable and may not offset future RENDER price divergence within any fixed period.
